The Negative Impact Of Technology In Education

Robots can effect employment in a negative way,as said by the author Kelly “It may be hard to believe… 70 percent of today’s occupation will likewise be replaced by automation...even you will have your job taken away by machines”(Kelly Page.300), this quote comes to show the negative aspect of robots taking over the world in the near

In today’s America, with robots on the rise, many people are feeling as if machines are threatening their jobs, and therefore their income, way of life, and basic stability. This is not an unreasonable fear. In 2013, Carl Frey and Michael Osborne with the University of Oxford predicted at as many as half the jobs in the United States could be automated within the next twenty years (Frey and Osborne). Even in the 1930s, economists such as John Maynard Keynes, the creator of Keynesian economics, predicted that technological developments could create economic climate that allows for a 15-hour work week with plenty of free time for the average American worker by the year 2030 (Thompson). The American workforce is shifting towards this prediction

In the essay “Better than Human” Kevin Kelly states his thesis hat robots will someday replace humans in the work place. Kelly starts by explaining how the Industrial Revolution has changed the way manual labor is performed as a result of automation; replacing humans with machines. Kelly says that the increasing demand for automation, artificial intelligence has given machines the ability to manage tasks from “manual labor to knowledge work.” (300) Kelly then says that robots will begin to replace blue and white collar jobs such as, assembly, heavy lifting, analytical, and medical applications. Kelly explains the innovative breakthrough named Baxter, a robot typically made for industrial applications

Unemployment has always taken America into its darkest ages; therefore, the United States needs to stay away from automation in order to prevent another employment downfall. By introducing intelligent machines into America, businesses will seek to acquire some of the technology. Since the machines don’t require a wage, businesses will increase in profit making them big barrels of money. Even if the machines are at high cost, it doesn’t mean businesses will forget about it, yet they know they will benefit on the long term by getting the machines. As a result, employees will start getting fired from their jobs, getting replaced by robots. This will ruin families and the peaceful society that has been present through the years.

The article “Automation Makes Us Dumb” from Nicolas Carr, published November 21st, 2014 talks about how the advancement of technology has resulted in the automation of many jobs and processes, which in return has caused the human proficiency and creativity aspect to dwindle. Carr does recognize the importance of automation in the different job fields and uses the examples like airplane pilots’ ability to conduct manual maneuvers that are required for pilots to always know. He has found that these types of skills have slowly slipped away as pilots have relied on autopilot automation functions more. Carr starts his example with workers in a factory shortly after World War II and continues his example to even the white-collar workers today.

In “Better Than Human,” Kevin Kelly, Senior Maverick of Wired Magazine, insists that automation will allow us to become more human. When society grants automation the permission to complete the most menial tasks, it will allow individuals trapped in dead-end careers such as fastening bolts onto cars, to search for their true passions which only humans can accomplish. More people will be able to pursue jobs that robots, for now, can not complete with ease. Kelly believes that as artificial intelligence and the creators of it advance, more jobs will be created to fulfill society's growing needs. The simple tasks of assembling new machinery can be completed by the already established automation; while the job of developing software that controls

We have already seen a decrease in jobs due to automation. Since 2000, the United States has lost 5 million factory jobs, while from 2006 to 2013, manufacturing grew by 17.6% (roughly 2.2% a year). 88% of those jobs were lost due to “productivity growth,” cites a study by Ball State University. The study also found that all sectors grew in terms of productivity by at least 32% from 1998 to 2012 when adjusted for inflation, with computer and electronic products rising 829%. In fact, the researchers found: “If 2000-levels of productivity are applied to 2010-levels of production, the U.S. would have required 20.9 million manufacturing workers instead of the 12.1 million actually employed.” In summary, due to companies’ expenditures in automation and software, the output per U.S. manufacturing worker has doubled over the past two decades. Indeed, “the real robotics revolution is ready to begin,” according to the Boston Consulting Group, who predict “the share of tasks that are performed by robots will rise from a global average of around 10% across all manufacturing industries

The introduction and advancement of automation and robots has reduced the amount of jobs available for the less educated.

Although Kelly makes persuasive points, critics can find flaws in his argument. One criticism of Kelly’s argument could be that much of his argument is based on hypothetical premises. For instance, he states “70% of today’s occupations will likewise be replaced by automation” (Kelly 300). While there is no concrete evidence to back up this claim that exactly 70% of jobs will be overtaken, the point remains the same that occupations are continuing to be replaced by automation. Whether it is ten, twenty, or one hundred percent, is irrelevant. His main point that people will need to learn to collaborate with robots in order to be successful still stands true. Additionally, people may say that if robots take over all of our manual labor jobs, people who have lower education or intellect will have

As technology advances and robots become more vital to our everyday life, machines will ruin the human race. Although, the invention of robots has created major controversy around it, according to Kevin Kelly, writer of “Better than Human: Why Robots Will—and Must—Take Our Jobs”, it is believed that increasing automation in the workplace must occur because it will benefit our society and increase productivity. He suggest that instead of essentially competing against robots we should welcome them and work alongside them. Kelly uses convincing arguments and an authoritative matter of fact tone to successfully persuade the reader, but fails to use counter arguments to further prove his argument.

Introduction: Humanity has always struggled with the concepts of automation because of its lasting effects on people. While most would argue against automation in this classroom, I suggest instead that we accept it and allow it to become part of our lives. I have family members whose jobs have been replaced by automation, and I honestly think they are living a better life because of it. It will affect humans well in both the long and short term by allowing us to continue to push towards an optimistic future. I understand that this is a long way off, and I understand it will be a hard road but it is worth it.

Technological growth is exponential. Inventions and innovations build on each other to create products that could only be dreamt of ten years before, such as 3D printing and virtual reality. For many people, these advancements in technology bring to mind a new phone or having do less chores around the house. For others, such as laborers, it represents losing their jobs. The World Economic Forum recently predicted that automation will replace five million jobs currently held by humans by the year 2020 (Kamenetz). But when considering robots taking jobs in a field such as teaching, where communication is a crucial component, the question is not “Is it possible?”, but “Should it be done?” Advocates for artificial intelligence (AI) teachers

Over time our lives seem to have become more and more integrated with our technology. Some may say that this is a very bad thing because this change may result in the loss of jobs for millions of people. Jobs such as, cashiers, bankers, legal assistants, and maybe even taxi drivers. The future may appear bleak at first, but the truth of the matter is that robots taking over our simple and automatable jobs just mean that our jobs can evolve with the technology. A very similar thing happened during the industrial revolution when technologies were developed that massively increased the efficiency and yield of farming. This in turn led to a vast increase of food in the country which led to a lesser need for everyone to be a farmer. With a massive amount of food, former farm workers, and advanced technology, a business of mass production and manufacturing began. The loss of jobs due to technology led to a

“Brain. “Dave, my mind is going,” HAL says, forlornly. “I can feel it. I can feel it.” from 2001: A Space Odyssey. In the article by Nicholas Carr “Is Google Making Us Stupid” published in:The Norton Reader talks about the negative impact of the internet has on his life and others around him. He talks about how the internet has given birth to many good things like social media and accessing information easily. But it is also bad for us because we start to lose our attention span due the short articles and stuff that we see on the internet. This is why the internet/technology is negative for education because it distract us/lose focus in the classrooms, and as a result makes our grades lower and production in classroom negative.

Humans as mostly progressive beings continue to evolve, constantly feeling the urge to rise to the apex versions of themselves. However, will humans rise only to fall? Well, there are both sides to everything and the possibility of technology bringing society to its knees has sparked a lot of controversies. Though the use of technology comes with some negative effect like students being distracted, I wholeheartedly agree that humans should embrace and advocate for the use and advancement of technology in schools. Technologies not only create a better environment for students in terms of their academics, but it also helps control the risk of plagiarism in school. At the end of the day, the positive effect of technology in education outweighs the negative effect. The day to day lives of students is made easier by technologies.