The Negative Impacts Of High School Sports

In the article, The Case Against High-School Sports suggests that American schools are putting too much focus on sports than on education. After analyzing the gathered information, I have concluded that sports are being pushed over education in the United States. In this article, I found myself agreeing with many of the points the author was making. The United States is far behind many countries in our educational system; we don’t seem to take education as seriously as we do sports. We also spend an unbelievable amount of our average school funding on athletes, while sometimes spending less than half on each student. Lastly, we have plenty of evidence of schools improving with school sports cuts, but we haven’t been successful in creating a real balance.

America has high school sports for many reasons. One sports allows young individuals to practice life lessons, sportsmanship,and allows kids to work on there social skills as well. Sports allow students to practice time management, character building and for many the high school athlete is also one of your higher academic students as well. Now this is not always the case , but for the most part kids who are involved in sports have to be responsible for academics in order to particpate . In the Article " The Case Against High School Sports" I can see why the principle shut down sports in the school. I think having good teachers and being able to fund good teachers has to be a priority. I am not sure what the principle did would work everywhere

For many years, people have debated about the importance of keeping sports in academic environments, or getting rid of them. Athletic activities have always been in U.S schools, but getting rid of them could allow kids to focus on their studies and increase their academic skill. Therefore, sports should be discarded in academic institutions to save money, allow more time for kids to study, and have additional activities available to students.

Academic excellence doesn’t assure a healthy mind. Although academic excellence fulfills us with a feeling of achievement it might lead students to further mental health problems, whereas sports builds up discipline and a healthier lifestyle. I believe taking sports as early during high school is crucial for the health and further development of students.

Public high schools in the United States are responsible for predominantly educating children in the classroom. However, an education should be well rounded and teach students about multiple different aspects of life. Fitness education, physical education, and high school athletics are competitive. Public high schools hold the responsibility to offer as many sports as possible and to support as many students to succeed. Terminating high school sports would be a drastic decision. “One 2010 study by Betsey Stevenson, then at the University of Pennsylvania, found that, in a given state, increases in the number of girls playing high-school sports have historically generated higher college-attendance and employment rates among women. Another study, conducted by Columbia’s Margo Gardner, found that teenagers who participated in extracurriculars had higher college-graduation and voting rates, even after controlling for ethnicity, parental education, and other factors” (Ripley, “The Case Against High School Sports”). However we cannot ignore the fact that high school sports require a large amount of tax dollars, attribute to lower academic rankings, and pressure youth to conform for organization regulations.

In countries around the world, people are debating whether they should keep athletics in public schools, or ban them. Studies have shown that schools would be better off without sports. Therefore, schools should not have sports to save money, make students’ education a priority, and adapt to their new environment.

Over the years there has been a continuing debate about the effects of athletic participation on academic achievement. It has become an even bigger issue now that there are budget constraints in our nation’s schools. Decision makers often find it easy to cut athletic programs because they believe sports are not overly important in the academic arena. In the late 1980’s, Holland and Andre (1987) argued that many secondary schools eliminated some of the extracurricular programs based solely on financial grounds without considering the empirically based knowledge of the positive effects of these programs on adolescent development. It is obvious that decision makers need to be well informed

In Amanda Ripley article she states that “sports and schools mixed with academics is that the message it sends is dishonest and shapes kids’ priorities”. I don’t agree with this stat meant because students in sports are more likely to have better grades then people who aren’t in school. I agree with Kevin Kniffin’s article witch states “ that sports offer formative and life-long lessons that stick with people who play sports”. I feel this way because I play sports at school and they have taught me life-long lessons that I will be able to use. Research shows that people who have played sports get better jobs, with better pay. Also get benefits that last a lifetime. Sports need to stay in school they help people in life and become a better student and person.

For a long time, American schools have debated if they should keep after school sports, or cancel them. According to the article “Should You Get Rid Of Sports” many schools claimed that if a student performs in school athletics you're not going to have as much time to focus on learning which is very crucial to pass school ( Ripley 10). Although sports are good for exercise and giving you joy, school academics are much more crucial to life rather than sports are(11). This is serious because it shows how school sports can easily interfere with school learning and how 80% of students that don’t take school sports pass and 50% that participate in sports pass. Although sports are good for your health, school education is way more useful in life, so for those kids

In order to improve academics, schools should consider disposing sports. According to Amanda Ripley, students in other nations are “recognized more for their academic achievements, not because they won a game”. More specifically, America lags behind 20 nations in high school graduation rates because there is too much of an emphasis on sports. After school sports have been around for decades and administrations are discussing whether or not to keep or exclude them. Academies have been thinking about exterminating school sports because of the low graduation rates compared

First off, student athletes have better overall GPA’s than those who don’t play sports. During a 1986 study involving the grades of 24,000 students, out of which the records of 1,500 student athletes and 4,553 students who did not play sports were examined, it was found that the average GPA of student athletes was higher than the average GPAs of non-athletes. While students who did not play sports had an average GPA of 2.12, student athletes GPA average was 2.67(Cooper). This is important because many people believe that sports cause kids to slack off in school, but in reality, the athletics actually sharpen the athletes focus. Student athletes have to keep their grades up to minimum standard so that they are allowed to play, and this serves as motivation for academic success. In addition to having better overall GPA’s, student athletes also have less failing grades. The same study from above also looked at the percentage of failing grades student athletes obtained. During the off-season, 35 percent of all possible F’s were given, but while the season was going on, student athletes only received 23 percent of potential F’s. As you can see, student athletes were doing better academically while participating in their sport than when they were not(Cooper). This also matters because the main focus of school is to learn, and to succeed, and if sports are helping students achieve that, then school sports should be a no brainer. As stated above, at most schools, students can’t be failing any classes if they want to participate in

For many years schools have debated on whether they should or should not have after school sports programs. According to people in the US, school sports are a distraction for students. Therefore, schools should eliminate sports to cut costs, gain more time for the students to rest, and allow them to advance in their academic work.

Stepping into a high school, one might find a poster advertising the school play, or a signup sheet advocating for more students in an after school club. But one thing you’re almost guaranteed to find is a trophy case commemorating the football team, or a banner promoting school spirit for that night’s game. In short? You’ll always find sports at a high school. As one of the most common extracurricular activities, sports offer something for everyone, and despite all of the stereotypes, stigmas, and unfounded claims surrounding sports, playing sports will positively affect your high school life and experience. Playing sports will positively affect high school life because sports improve your social interaction and mental mindset, it is academically beneficial, and it helps better and maintain

Although they may seem beneficial, in reality, after-school sports pull students’ minds away from their education. According to Amanda Ripley, the author of an article in the Scholastic Scope Magazine, when it comes to school and grades, “distraction . . . may be the greatest cost of all” (11). Ripley also states that during the football season, attention is directed to athletics rather than learning (11). It is obvious that even students that are not athletes can easily get caught up in the excitement and suspense of games, however; this causes immense damage to the academic aspect of school, which should be the top priority. Essentially, if this colossal distraction

Do sports have a role in the lives of students? In an article posted by the Atlantic authored by Amanda Ripley on October of 2013 titled "The Case Against High-school Sports", Ripley questions the added value of sports to high schools and its students, outlining that the focus on sports has resulted in poor international test results. The article further used schools in various cities and countries, such as Shanghai, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Finland as exemplary examples, stating that at some institutions in these cities and countries have shifted or eliminated sports in the school system and are heavily focused on being purely academic institutions, which as stated in the article yielded higher rankings in international standardized test.