The Negative Leadership Experience
Workplace characteristics distinguish one leader from another. Some leaders possess positive and motivating behaviors whereas other leaders possess behaviors that are more negative. Negative behaviors can affect creativity deficiencies and alter employee morale. A positive behavior, however, will encourage bringing out the best in others. By doing so, the leader endorses a positive culture that permeates confidence and motivation. The behavior, positive or negative, is the catalyst that drives employee morale and professional growth.
The Micromanagement Experience
In the beginning, the leader provided extensive oversight to the newly transferred subordinate. Although the subordinate appreciated the leader’s initial guidance, the immersing oversight became daunting. The subordinate recognizes that the leader is a micromanager. Further observation concluded that the leader’s control tactics are the result of the leader’s fear of making mistakes and unwillingness to accept change as evident in the leader’s dictation of each step in the assignment. The leader rarely utilized the subordinate’s ideas, opinions, or solutions. Eventually, the subordinate approaches new assignments with an altered mindset of how should it be done rather than a collaborative approach that offers diverse ideas and opinions. Consequently, the subordinate began to lose energy, motivation, and disempowerment in making decisions or using creativity for
Positive or Negative Leadership example (briefly describe and give relevant page numbers): On Page 102 SSgt. Bellavia is preparing for the ramp to drop and begin to move on foot towards Fallujah and notices Ruiz is beginning to act nervous. He begins to ask what he should be doing however he is still extremely nervous so SSgt. Bellavia begin to attempt to calm him down buy joking with him about switching jobs.
Excellence of an organizational leadership determines how well an organization is doing. Effective leadership is influencing the behavior of individuals and groups in positive way to work towards a predefined organizational goal (Baack, 2012). An effective leader creates vision for the organization and effectively communicates with employees to set the organizational direction for growth, align the structure of the organization to meet the goals, and define organizational culture where employees can perform and grow along with the organization. Effective leaders create organizational strategies to inspire and motivate employees to achieve organizational goals and vision. There are many leadership theories evolved in organizational behavior over time. Some of the examples for leadership theories include great man theories, trait theory, behavioral theories, situational leadership, contingency theories, transactional leadership, transformational leadership and charismatic leadership.
A leader 's characteristics can identified as how the leader can direct, motivate, guide and manage groups of people. Leaders can inspire for change and transformation. This may motivate others to achieve, establish and initiate. How each person leads, there are vast differences. Fortunately there are multiple of frameworks that better identify and understand these distinctive leadership styles.
The workforce within any organization is the engine that keeps the business moving forward. Positive leadership, as well as effective and competent following, could be the difference between success and failure for a business. Effective leadership and followers should have a symbiotic relationship, which is the most effective way a business will meet its goals. It can be seen within Jake’s Pet Land case study that there truly is a difference between leadership styles amongst different leaders. While Philip and Jan took a different approach to being a leader, Adam’s role of the follower stayed the same. Adam continued to exemplify the best characteristics possible as a follower in order to make the business as
Leaders who participate in dishonest practices regularly make an environment of recompense inside of the association that is helpful for deviant worker conduct that parallels that of the pioneer (Trevino and Brown, 2005). Employees will watch the moral judgment of their CEO or overseeing chief and are frequently liable to mirror, regardless of the possibility that such impersonation constitutes acting unscrupulously. Generally, regardless of whether a pioneer is compensated for his or her conduct will likewise help focus the probability of representative impersonation. A few powers make despicable comments, verbally ill-use, exclude, and put down their subordinates. Exploration and media reports recommend that turning into a casualty of leaders ' coldhearted treatment is a negative ordeal for workers, impeding to their prosperity and the proficiency of the association. Abuse by leaders has been alluded to in a few ways, including interpersonal shamefulness, oppressive supervision social undermining, oppression, and tormenting (Hoel & Cooper, 2001). Albeit every conceptualization has unpretentious contrasts, they all include workers ' observations that some of their principal mental needs are hindered by a power figure. Abused workers react contrarily to pioneer abuse and are more prone to take part in freak conduct, damaging standards of thoughtful behavior and of productive creation (Bennett & Robinson, 2000). These standard
Effective leaders clarify the path to help their followers achieve their goals and make the journey easier by reducing roadblocks and pitfalls. Research demonstrates that employee performance and satisfaction are positively influenced when the leader compensates for the shortcomings in either the employee or the work setting.
For my example of a negative leadership behavior I have encountered, I am going to use an example from my current position, and will therefore mask certain details to protect all involved. However, I assure you the pertinent facts are here and are not embellished.
I certify that I am the author of this paper and that any assistance I receive in its preparation is fully acknowledged and disclosed in this paper. I have also cited any sources from which I used data, ideas, or works, either quoted directly or paraphrased. I also certify that this paper was prepared by me specifically for this course.
Leaders have a “the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals” (Robbins & Judge, 2007, p. 402). In the past leaders have been described by certain traits or characteristics. These traits can help an organization identify potential candidates who may be strong leaders. Later behavior approaches of leaders were identified that could be taught. In short, leaders could be made. Situations have an impact on which leader behaviors will be most effect at any given time. Several contingency theories have been formulated over the years to identify how situations influence leadership behavior. Each style has strengths and
Leader behavior, follower characteristics and task characteristics all impact a follower's motivation and to determine how effective, or ineffective, a leader may be (Northouse, 2010).
The purpose of this personal assessment is to devalue an incident in which I believe I performed my very best, within my leadership capability, according to organizational policies, and lawful regulatory compliance while protecting cultural competence and our organization from any legal repercussions. Business environment will continue evolve and it is pivotal to the success of the organization that all potential leaders acquire the fundamentals of understanding human behaviors within a multicultural atmosphere. Different situations will arise in which leadership will need to focus on the many aspects of one’s personal beliefs, culture as a whole, and productivity at the least. What is evident is the diversity within
For centuries leaders have been analyzed in order to determine what the traits and characteristics of a successful leader are. Leadership, as defined by Koontz and Weihrich (2008) is “the art or a process of influencing people so that they will strive willingly and enthusiastically toward the achievement of group goals” (p. 311). Leadership plays an important role in employee’s participation, creativity, recruitment to an organization, their commitment to the organization, and productivity levels. Over the years, there have been a number of theories surrounding leadership such as the “Great Man” theory, which, according to Riaz and Haider (2010), “assumes that leaders are born and have innate qualities, therefore, leaders
Research on management and leadership in organizations over the past century shows there are still no clear definitions or answers about what counts as effective and successful leadership; the field remains varied and argued. Actual studies of leadership began in the early twentieth century. The research and studies on leadership have resulted in defining what characters, traits and attitudes are considered to be significant for leaders to possess. The early studies of leadership theories focused on the person and their behaviors, currently known as leadership trait theories and behavioral theories. It is important for organizational leaders and managers to understand what characteristics, traits and actions of an individual mark a great leader when forming a strong diverse workforce.
There are many examples of poor leadership behavior in today’s workplace. Inadequate leadership can be detrimental not only to a team within an organization, but also to the entire organization itself. I believe it is vital for upper management to ensure that their leaders are properly trained and aware of how to handle certain situations and employees. When a leader’s weaknesses are overlooked, large problems occur.
Bova (2008) states that the following four characteristics are found in good leaders: they believe in open communication, they do not stick with the status quo, they are selective in what they measure, and they have passion for values and culture. Each characteristic is essential to a healthy organizational culture. When an employee feels he or she has open communication with a leader, they are more inclined to share if problems arise whether or not work related. Non-work related issues may eventually take a toll on an employee’s performance at work. However, with open communication, an employee feels comfortable in apprising the leader of a situation so that future problems are avoided.