The Negative Stereotypes Of A Child 's Interaction With Barbie

When evaluating the sample of participants, the majority reported having previously owned or currently owning a Barbie. Of that majority, 59% stated they owned one Barbie and 57% reported having two or more. Of those that haven’t or do not currently own a Barbie, 41% reported to have never played with one and 24% stated that they play with a Barbie on a regular basis. (The participant’s parents were the one’s surveyed to avoid error.) The procedure began with participants being randomly assigned (by rolling of die) to one of three toys; Fashion Barbie, Doctor Barbie and Mrs. Potato head. Doctor Barbie was chosen to highlight the concept that playing with a sexualized doll, regardless of the career costume, affects young girls’ perception of gender roles and careers. Fashion Barbie was used to demonstrate the A-typical over sexualized doll. Mrs. Potato head was chosen as she is not sexualized at all, but is a well-known feminine character. Based on the assignment a participant received, they were escorted into a room containing 12 of the assigned toys. Participants were not aware there were other toy options, or that the toys were a part

One study took a group of 6th grade girls and had them play with Barbie’s, then later asked them what their views of Barbie were:

This becomes a big issue when you take into consideration the dolls attire. Many of them come featured in expensive fur coats and crop tops which is extremely inappropriate for a child’s toy. The young girls could be led to think that it is ok to dress in the sexually inappropriate ways that Bratz dress. This is why “The American Psychological Association believes that Bratz dolls are far worse than Barbie dolls considering the way they’re dressed in fishnet stockings and very short skirts” (gigkk). Young girls don’t usually realize what they are playing with, but in these cases they will definitely notice how they look drastically different from their supposedly “look alike” dolls. Their “adult-like bodies are too sexualized for young girls because they have not yet built their self esteem”. This can cause havoc on a young girl's brains according to the research of the American Psychological Association, “‘We have ample evidence to conclude that sexualization has negative effects in a variety of domains, including cognitive functioning, physical and mental health, and healthy sexual development’”(Eileen L. Zurbriggen, PhD, chair of the APA Task Force). These little girls should be able to dress their dolls in stuff that they are dressed

Young girls have been playing with Barbie dolls since the dolls inception at the American International Toy Fair in New York. Recently, researchers have been skeptical on whether the dolls have an effect on the self-image of girls who play with them. In order to determine if Barbies have an impact on young-girls self-concept, clinicians have carried out several studies where they monitor the interaction between the young girls and the famous figurine. From these experiments, scientists concluded that Barbies can have a bearing on a girls self-image, making the consumers who buy the doll more aware of the issue Barbie

As I was on the hunt for the perfect gift for an 8 year old’s birthday, I discovered the doll market is quite different than my coming of age. Undoubtedly, Barbie is still problematic, but now she has competitors, including Bratz, and Monster High dolls, who are noticeably thinner than barbie and dressed up to look like grown women getting ready for a night of clubbing than a game of tennis. As I pick up the first doll box, I find a doll chained up in a slither of clothing with a blank expression on her face, a prominent thigh gap, with the tagline “GREAT for girls ages 5 and up!” By all means, I never imagined in my life that I would miss Barbie. For that reason, I begin to sit myself down in the toy aisle to start googling everything I could about these dolls on my

Since the rise of mass media in America throughout the 20th century, the idea of feminine beauty has changed significantly, especially women’s body shape. American visual media has always been guilty of promoting the current “ideal” women’s body shape, despite these body shapes being virtually impossible for the average American woman to achieve. By analyzing the way that the “ideal” women’s body shape in America has changed, it becomes clear how the media has always kept a tight grasp on the American woman’s individuality. Between 1900 and 1910, popular culture made way for the “Gibson Girl,” who was created by the iconic artist Charles Dana Gibson.

Barbie has been a household name for decades and many kids around the world love and adore her greatly. Through the years Barbie has been at the top without any challengers to bring her down. Executives and shareholder love the way in which Barbie conquers all of the competition. Since its inception in 1945, Mattel has been collecting market intelligence in some form (Nash & Duvall, 2005). As a man, I even understood the importance of Barbie to little girls growing up. Around Christmas, Barbie had all the commercials appealing to the little girls and tweens.

Barbie has become a pillar of the children’s toy market since her inception. Forbes reports, “Ninety percent of American girls ages three to ten own at least one Barbie, according to the doll’s maker, Mattel톖.” The doll has an impactful reach on kids today through both the dolls and other products that have been inspired by or created to accompany Barbie. This exposure, which has been proven to damage the self-esteem of women (American Psychological Association 1), impacts the development of kid’s views of themselves and other people. Comparing real women to these images causes these girls to have negative views of themselves as they grow older and judge other women harshly. It also causes boys to hold girls to an unreasonable standard of their appearances, which further damages the girl’s self worth when they don’t meet these standards (ScienceDaily 1). Consequently, the

There have been several articles calling attention to the images children are exposed in cartoons, or Disney productions, but what about the toys they play with? In the death grip of my two year old sister, like many other young girls, lies a fairy princess Barbie doll. Barbie has been the toy of choice for girls everywhere since her debut fifty years ago, representing the ideal girl with a perfect life to match that can not be achieved. Barbie and other dolls alike negatively affect young girls causing body image issues and low self-esteem.

In the article, “ Influence of Barbie on Gender Identity” Barbie is considered to have a negative impact on households in America because of the way Barbie looks, discriminated as from other minorities, and the roles she has as a woman which are stereotypes. Many feel as though Barbie gives young girls insecurities at a young age and that when young girls interact with a Barbie they are supposed to act and think in a mature way. One person wrote in this article that Barbie has never influenced her gender identity when she was growing up. She never thought about Barbie as a bad influence. As she stated, “ All I was worried about was whether or not Barbie had all her accessories and looked pretty once I clothed her” (qtd.

We have an eleven year old girl, and we do let her to play with Barbie dolls. However, we do not let her play with Bratz dolls. My fiancée thinks that the Bratz line of dolls are too sexualized, and I must admit, when I first saw them I joked that the Bratz line should be called “Street Walker Barbie.” I do think that negative body image is real problem, but the impact of dolls on body image is comparatively insignificant. Barbie dolls, which have been around for nearly sixty years, are not the cause of the current body image crises that is infecting the girls and woman of our country. We are contently bombarded by advertising, fashion magazines, video games, TV shows, and music videos, that dictate what beauty is supposed to be, setting unrealistic

The results suggest that Barbie dolls are pervasive with girls’ experiences, and that young adolescents believe the dolls influence girls’ developing self-concept.” In fact, according to my experience over Spring break, visiting the toy section in “toys “R” Us” I observed toys such as Barbie’s. I took a closer look at their bodies and how they were dressed. The message I perceived through this observation was: as young girls get older, this is what they’re supposed to look like. They should maintain tight fitted clothing, a slim body with long shiny legs, and always wear makeup to create the illusion of having a flawless face, with “perfect” features. Dressing up the Barbie’s and brushing their hair can be very encouraging to playing with them. They also influence the player to become addicted and take on these stereotypical roles into their daily lives. Therefore, several toy companies not only stereotype body images, but also a woman’s lifestyle. Sharing my experience and visions of what children play with is: although Barbie is known for being the developmental toy, it is very vague and has nothing to do with

Since her creation in 1959, Barbie has been a mainstream toy for young people in the U.S. In 1998, generally, young ladies in the U.s. claimed eight of these dolls and give or take two were bought consistently some place on the planet (Turkel, 1998). With every last bit of her notoriety and the determined part she plays in numerous young ladies ' lives, little research has yet been be carried out on whether she may have a hurtful impact on the advancement of the young ladies who cherish her.

Karmiol (2012) conducted a study called, "Who Likes Bratz? The Impact of Girls ' Age and Gender Role Orientation on Preferences for Barbie Versus Bratz." The main purpose of this research was to study girl 's preferences of Barbie 's in comparison to Bratz in relation to gender roles and the dolls orientation (Karmiol et.al., 2012). Karmiol hypothesized that the girl 's choice in doll would impact their gender orientation, on a scale of whether the doll is seen a feminine, masculine or androgynous (Karmiol et.al.,

proportions. With extremely long legs, a tiny clinched waist, and supposedly large breasts, she gives young women “an unrealistic idea about the way we should look or what we should weigh” (Mirror-Mirror). However, in a study released in 2010, 117 6-10 year old Dutch girls were given one of three toys: an Emme doll, a Barbie doll, or Legos. The girls played for 10 minutes, before the researchers asked the girls questions about their body image. They determined that toy did not affect their body image.