The New Right Essay

The most noteworthy component of Ronald Reagan’s two terms as leader of the free world are the laws, regulations, and policies passed under his two terms as President of the United States. These regulations soon became known as “Reaganomics”, a term that is still used today to describe these policies. Hidden underneath the manufactured depiction of Reaganomics policies by mass media lies a controversial observation: these policies may have created a permanent shift in American society which, as a result, disenfranchised minorities since they went into effect over thirty years ago. This particular idea or theory is exceptionally contradictory and has been distorted by not only various media outlets but by subsequent pro-Reaganomics

In the mid to late 1900s, the development and rise of the New Right sparked a new era in American life. The New Right was a political conservative group that criticized the liberalism of the Great Society as well as the conservative activists that had any association with the sexual revolution and with feminism.The success of the New Right depended on considering both the interests of both moral and economic conservatives. The alliance, of the New Right, shifted from supporting Barry Goldwater to Ronald Reagan, because of this not only were right-wing Americans able to develop a conservative movement in the United states, but also allowed for Reagan be elected president in the 1980s. Ronald Reagan became a New Right hero. Reagan publicly supported fewer government regulations, free-market economics and lower taxes. Ronald Reagan 's tax cuts would in the end result in a tax increase.Although supported by the New Right, Reagan more often found himself rejecting the Christian Right. Regan regularly dismayed them by not pursuing their interests, on topics such as religious prayer and participation in public schools and the subject of abortion, enough as the Christian Right had wished.

People’s views on a wide range of issues are influenced or determined by the kind of foundational belief systems they hold. Therefore, the difference in the nature of opinions among individuals or groups of people alludes to the existence of distinct belief systems. In the course of history, the distinction between Liberalism and Conservatism has become more vivid particularly in the political arena where various players have expressed opposing points of view regarding the nation’s future. It is indeed undisputable that the foundational beliefs of Liberalism are diametrically opposed to those of Conservatism. This essay will give a definition of each term and describe how the two oppose each other.

Liberalism, in general, was an ideological movement that emerged out of the ideas of the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution in the early 19th century. It embraced the ideas of individualism which were established in the Renaissance and Reformation era. The Renaissance period sparked a belief in the importance of the individual in society. It helped promote the beliefs of classical liberalism which gradually formed into the liberal ideology of the 19th century. Individuals that were waiting to get their individual rights and freedoms were allowed to finally gain liberty and power through this period of time. Classical liberalism developed

America has been plagued with the “American Dream” since its citizens first started spreading out westward in search of wealth and fame. Along with this American ideal came the concept of being un-American and not standing for what was considered “true” American. With the emergence of Populists, Progressives and Radicals came a vast difference between what was thought as American. All groups claimed to be trying to make the US a better place however each differed vastly in their ideas of going about it. During the age of uncertainty between 1890 and the 1920’s a new movement called the Progressives emerged in parts of the Unites States. They emerged as part of a long tradition of reform aimed at correcting the issues of the country.

What came to be referred to as the New Left, were a generation of young people with new ideas and visions for social change. They rebelled against what they saw as the apathy of the status quo of the “elitist”, middle-class affluence into which they were born. As they attended colleges and universities, they did not view history as being the forward progression of the pursuit of truly better lives for all men.

The 1950s in America are often described as a time of complacency. By contrast, the 1960s and 1970s were a time of great change. But the economy of the 70s was not stable because of the Oil crisis and presidents did not seem to find a solution to get the economy work again. For the right, the federal government had been spending too much money on the social programs. Conservatism believes that the best way to run a society is to maintain social and political framework and that the government should be as limited as possible,

A population’s views on political issues may change as different circumstances occur each day. The environment around us has a powerful influence on the decisions that we produce and the views that we as American citizens choose to hold. After a semester in political science class my views and my political ideology have altered. Today I will explain how political science class has influenced my political ideology.

Looking at the United States in 1965, it would seem that the future of the liberal consensus was well entrenched. The anti-war movement was in full swing, civil rights were moving forward, and Johnson's Great Society was working to alleviate the plight of the poor in America. Yet, by 1968 the liberal consensus had fallen apart, which led to the triumph of conservatism with the election of President Reagan in 1980. The question must be posed, how in the course of 15 years did liberal consensus fall apart and conservatism rise to the forefront? What were the decisive factors that caused the fracturing of what seemed to be such a powerful political force? In looking at the period from 1968 to the

Republican dominance of American politics in the 1980s was led by President Reagan and the New Right. The New Right consisted of cultural conservatives who were not particularly in favor of federal family planning agendas. Reagan had selected many people from the New Right to be part of his cabinet. Since President Reagan had elected people from the New Right all of them Republicans to be part of his cabinet this caused serious division between them and the Democrats within Congress. (Smith, Lecture Notes week, 7). In addition, during the 1980s and 1990s many Republican candidates tried to influence white middle-class voters to believe that Democrats were only concerned with minorities, not the average middle-class white person. President Reagan

Some people have characterized the New Left as an era of youth revolts and radical movements. However, the New Left was a combination of everything that took place through the 1950’s to the mid 1970’s. It was an age that consisted of women and gays questioning their roles and rights in society to African Americans fighting to gain equal rights and ban segregation. Many people in the world today and back then would argue that there is no such thing as the New Left, but how could you not recognize something that changed history and the way the world viewed citizenship, equality, and human rights? I definitely believe that the New Left Movement existed and that all the people and

Conservatives united and became an energetic political force during the sixties. Attacking the alleged blurred view of right and wrong within the Vital Center the New Right attempted to clearly articulate the importance of recognising the existence of a clear political right and wrong. Founded by William F Buckley, the National Review magazine became a leading voice in promoting New Conservative values and ideas. Generally the New Right advocated a growing concern about the expansion of federal power while favoring an aggressive foreign policy, dramatic increases in military spending, and and the end to most social welfare programs. Comprised of a developed base of support from Suburban communities, especially in the south and west, of middle-class whites. Combined with a concern about the decline of morality and the growth of federal power many suburban residents developed a hatred of Washington. Other common shared beliefs

As the modern world enters an era of new ideas and more freedoms, conservative notions are being left behind rapidly.

In the mist of a disgruntled working class, one Austrian born man rose to power, playing on their fears of immigrants, unemployment and globalization. By mixing social populism, xenophobia, German nationalism with personal charisma, he was able to make his political party one of the strongest in his nation. Many would believe that this would be a description of the infamous dictator Adolph Hitler. Rather, it is a description of Jorg Haider, recent governor of the Austrian state of Carinthia and former leader of the Austrian Freedom Party.

An analysis, for instance, of how the conservative regimes of Margaret Thatcher in England and Ronald Reagan in the United States in the late 1970s and early 1980s won power would dissect how conservative groups gained dominance through control of the state, and the use of media, new technologies, and cultural institutions such as think tanks and fund-raising and political action groups (Kellner, 2005, p.6).