The New York : Legal Resources Organization Points Out

When looking for prospective employees, employers do not enjoy rifling through Facebook pictures of obscene pictures and statuses with crude language. Bad behavior of employees, even off the clock, made public by social media

According to a survey report done by the Kelly services with 170,000 people from 30 different countries, 55% of all the participants believe that the use of social media for both the personal and professional posts can cause problems in the workplace (Bennett, 2012). According to a study done by the proof point, many US companies that have hired the employees more than 1000 in number face a real problem with their employees to use social media (Ostrow 2009). Almost 17% of these companies had faced serious disrepute due to the offensive comments on the social media websites (Ostrow 2009). Almost 13% of the US companies have investigated the use of personal text messages that have been found to infringe the company’s law (Ostrow 2009).

The NLRB has made findings regarding the use of employee posts on Social Media sites to discipline or terminate those employees. Typically these cases occur when an employee posts “negative” information about their current employer or boss. Sometimes these are “public” and other times the employer uses “spies” or “fake friending” to see the Facebook page of the employee.

The purpose of this literary review is to enlighten my viewers of the importance of the ethical idea of companies crossing the lines of business with your personal life, when involving social media accounts. Most of my research has operated from the ATU library using the find it tool. Furthermost, the researched information use was from peer-reviewed research journal. I will discuss includes social media cons in the work environment, if it is ethical to get fired over a post, and laws that protect both parties. Social media includes an assortment of electronic communications—most commonly networking sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Myspace, Pinterest, Instagram, and the likes thereof. Social media also covers all forms of blogs, including Twitter (a micro-blog), wikis, online journals, diaries, personal newsletters, and World of Warfare and YouTube also are included under the umbrella term of social media (Lieber 2011).

An employer turns down a job application after seeing on the candidate’s Facebook profile that they are a heavy drinker. A company rejects an application after seeing on Twitter that the candidate is a Muslim with a veil around her head. Another employer rejects an application after seeing on their Facebook profile that they use derogatory terms when commenting on pictures and posts. These examples illustrate how technology has changed the way companies screen prospective employees and how these may eventually lead to legal implications based on protected grounds. In this rapidly-growing world where technology is accessible almost everywhere, employers and recruiters are utilizing technological methods to screen and evaluate

Hackings, gossip, any number of things can destroy the fragile glass we put up around ourselves to conceal our innermost secrets. Really, it's quite sad how vulnerable we make ourselves to attack through how much information we display, thinking it will remain 'private'. Privacy is a lovely theory, but not always an easy one to uphold. Our information, the conversations we have in confidence with other people, the very basic right we think we have to not have our personal lives exposed to the world, it’s all at very high risk, all the time. So much can go wrong so fast, leaving us like turtles without shells; exposed and

Privacy in America is developing into a vague set of rules. Each person has a right to privacy, but the question remains: “How much information should be granted to the public”? The answer to this question varies from person to person. The industries, social networking, protection agency, and everyday situations create their own ideology of what must remain private.

Privacy is a major problem in today’s society. With the technology we have now, it’s almost impossible to keep anything private. There are people out there can hack into your phone, computer, anything, and they can get all your private information. Like bank accounts, social security number, credit card account, and social media accounts. Nothing is really “private” in today’s world.

These new tools are “dedicated to community-based input, interaction, content-sharing and collaboration,” (Social Media, 2015). Everyone is on social media these days, including your employees, your competition, clients, and future clients. Being able to communicate with everyone is vital to the growth of the NSC. The problem with social media is that NSC can be held liable for legal issues arising from our employees’ social media use and accounts. Examples of issues include incidents such as discriminatory social media messages, different forms of harassing on Facebook, or even radical up scene tweets. Companies can also witness the issue of employees leaking of crucial company or customer information. These risks exist regardless of whether the employee commits the offense at the office using company-owned computer resources or at home using their personal social media accounts, since they are often identified as an employee of the company in their social media profile. Setting guidelines, training, and purpose behind social media can help the company grow expediential, while minimizing the negative ramifications affiliated with social

Today’s biggest ethical issue in the United States is employers and coworkers posting on social network websites costing themselves and others to lose their job. Due to the misuse of social networking by employees, employers across the country are setting policies regarding employee’s use of social network. Employers are setting policy as to what employees can and cannot say on social websites when they are on or off duty. An example is a news article I came across while browsing the web, article name: Waitress fired after complaining about bad tips on Facebook.

Privacy is a concept idea that could be understood on a certain level. However, according to “The Evolution (Or Devolution) of Privacy by Debbie V.S Kasper, the definition of the word itself changes dramatically base on variety of social institution and the situation that that the term is referring to. There are countless ways to interpret the meaning of privacy, but unfortunately, due to the broad nature of the conceptual structure of the idea, none of the statement has proven to be adequate to use as an official definition. Because of this reason, I strongly believe that privacy in today’s society does not exist anymore. Many studies have suggested that technological advancement is the main factor that leads to the dissolution of privacy,

In Zupek’s article, “How social media can hurt your career” she shows how business and corporations are becoming more apparent on social media. With the uprising of more companies being on social media, there is also an increase in monitoring on employees Facebook and twitter pages. Zupek gives direct tweets exchanged between employer and employee and tells the story of Kimberly Swanson. Swanson was an employee at Ivell Marketing and Logistic and worked in Clacton, U.K. and posted a status on Facebook expressing how boring she thought her job was. Days after this post was made, Swanson was called into her manager's office and fired for what she said on Facebook. Zupek concludes the article by giving tips on what not to do on social media and also claims that posts showing negative feelings towards one job should not be posted to be seen by the

Skype, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, LinkedIn and Facebook are a few popular social media sites that are used today. As a society, people no longer have to meet up face to face for a social gathering. This era of social interaction online. Not every one person shares the same common sense. However, employers should not control the lives of employees on the internet because this epoch of online communication and not everyone believes in same moral judgment.

Nowadays, while most people are enjoying the amazing changes that the technology has brought to us, there are some other folks in somewhere secretly observing us and collecting our information without letting us aware. “Transparency is for those who carry out public duties and exercise public power. Privacy is for everyone else” (Greenwald 201). Many people claim that they have nothing to worry because they don’t have anything to hide, they even say if people are concerned or scared about this is, it’s because they are doing something unpresentable and they could be guilty .

Social networking sites such as Twitter or Facebook have created a new ethical dilemma for many businesses. Corporations, small businesses, and even universities are struggling create policies to manage their employees social networking behaviors. Social networking access, particularly for recruiters, can provide personal information about potential employees, which would otherwise not be available. A business must follow statutes and guidelines when disclosing information to the public. Individuals on social networking sites have no such constraints. Employees can and do make comments about their employers online. Employers can and do watch what employees post online. Any individual can send or post potentially damaging information