The New Zealand Dairy And Beef Industry Essay

The beef industry is an important asset to United States agriculture as a whole. Over a million agricultural entities benefited from the sales of cattle and calves in the year 2000. Gross totals from sales of cattle and calves in 2000 totaled $40.76 billion accounting of 21% of all agricultural receipts making the beef sector the largest single agricultural enterprise. Direct and indirect employment in or related to the production and processing of beef supports over 1.4 million full-time-equivalent jobs in the US as well. Cattle are produced in all 50 states and their economic impact contributes to nearly every county in the nation and they are a significant economic driver (Lawerance and Otto, 2000).

The Australian Dairy Industry in general, remains to be one of the most important rural industries in Australia. In fact, the Australian Dairy Industry is a well-established industry in the nation (Dairy Australia n.d.). Murray Goulbur-Devondale holds a strong position within the Australian Dairy Industry due to the company’s ability to commit to promoting sustainable practices towards their environment, society and resources. Murray Goulburn-Devondale is committed to providing high quality dairy products to customers and to become the leader in dairy foods through “excellence and innovation” (Devondale Murray Goulburn 2014). The company’s branding position in the market has been improving and expanding to grow towards creating a strong global presence. To justify, Devondale Murray Goulburn (2014) acclaimed that the company has been ensuring to take necessary actions to improve environmental performance in order to reduce environmental impact and wastes to the area at which it operates. Furthermore, Murray Goulburn-Devondale has been working closely with their customers through research and development for the purpose of ensuring that the company is meeting the needs of the public. All these operations and research emphasize that Devondale makes to itself a stable and an effective position in the Australian dairy industry (Devondale Murray Goulburn 2014).

Why did cattle ranching develop on the Great Plains? Cattle ranching developed on the Great Plains because vast fortunes were made. The cattle industry was based on some very important factors which were wild cattle, wild horses, and grass. These factors made cattle ranching very profitable, but however, for the cattle barons the bonanza didn’t last forever. In the North the market for beef was growing huge, and that meant ranching was a good way to live.

Introduction (Attention Step): What do you think is the greatest cause of emission pollution? What do you believe is harming our planet? Well if you guessed that fossil fuel emissions are the biggest emission polluters, then you are completely wrong (attention getter). Animal Agriculture is actually the number one Greenhouse Gas emitter in the planet. Yes, cow farts are destroying the environment. It sounds crazy, but ever since the mid 60’s, agriculture associations have been spreading across the Americas and dominated the industry. The most destructive of all Ag corps are Livestock Corporation. These associations include IBP, Conagra, Perdue, Farmland National Beef, Cargill, etc … Animal Agriculture is effecting every single person in this room because we all breathe in the same air, drink the same water, and eat the same (credibility). The buildup of Animal Agriculture is a great destruction to our planet and our species because it is creating

It’s often argued that cows are the main source of our Methane emission, giving a strong argument to reduce, or even stop, our consumption of meat. In all actuality, only about six percent to seven percent of all greenhouse

In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith argues that people only agree to exchanges that are mutually beneficial. Free exchanges are necessary for a society to promote liberty. However, many industries force exchanges upon consumers. Forced exchanges will remain to be a problem in our ever-growing society as personal greed continues to grow. At what point, does one feel guilty for there ever lasting harm on our planet. There are multiple ways to make a living without having to harm the environment and force exchanges. More specifically I will discuss slaughterhouse workers, restaurant workers and the beef industry. The food industry exploits workers and continues to get away with it. The agriculture industry is the biggest single polluter in the world and people have no idea. It is safe to say, one of the worst culprit of forced exchanges is the American food industry.

It won’t come as a surprise to anyone that Americans like their meat. In fact, America produced 93 billion pounds of meat and poultry in 2012, which included some 32 million cattle. As many of us already know, agriculture has a significant impact on our environment in a variety of ways. In order to successfully rear livestock, slaughterhouses require large quantities of water, and emit plenty of greenhouse gases – methane and CO2 specially – during production.

As counterintuitive as it sounds, Londoners rather buy lamb from New Zealand as from the United Kingdom because raising lamb in the United Kingdom emits a large amount of carbon, and it’s more environmentally friendly to purchase the lamb from an area that is further away, but contains less carbon emission (Source C). When comparing the transportation energy to other factors of the farmers’ market, it is obvious that the amount of energy used for transportation is insignificant compared to the damage the farmers market casts on the environment. Many farmers will use fertilizers to give nutrients to the plants so that it will maximize its growth, but do not consider the long-term effects it has on the

The section covers background information, core products/services, mission and strategic objective, SWOT (Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Weaknesses) analysis and targeting strategy of the company.

The cattle industry produces vast amounts of strain in the environment. It is energy inefficient, pollutes water, occupies many acres of land, and deteriorates the health of the people who abuse its consumption. The government subsidizes this industry. Therefore, the price paid for meat doesn’t reflect the environmental hazards involved in the process. In order to protect our health and the health of the environment we should pay close attention to our food choices and make sure we don’t support industries that degrade it.

Most of the registered NAMAs are related either to energy efficiency solutions or to renewable energy ones. Less has be done for what concerns agriculture and even less if we just look at the livestock sector . Among all the NAMAs submitted before 2013, only six countries have explicitly included livestock as part of their mitigation strategy (Brazil, Chad, Jordan, Madagascar, Mongolia and Swaziland). Of these, only Brazil has submitted a quantitative target . Though, this sector has a large potential to reduce its emissions. The demand for livestock is expected to grow 70 percent by 2050 and this sector can contribute substantially in the international effort of reducing GHG emissions. The livestock sector emits around 7.1 gigatons of carbon

farmers in Australia play a vital role in dairy industry which is one of the leading industries in Australia. Dairy industry is well established across all the states of Australia. However there are eight main dairying regions in Australia such as western Victoria, New South Wales, Tasmania, Gippsland, Murray dairy, South Australia, Western Australia and Subtropical.

After the visit to "Wayne Bradley's" farm, Peter Singer and Jim Mason share some very important information on the experience with farming. Singer and Mason together examine negative impacts that individual Americans food choices have upon farmers, they believe should be the basis of dietary basics. The negative effects of much agriculture on animals, human health, and our environment as they have little faith that the American government will actually take the initiative to force the food industry to change without a lot of pressure, with this being said consumers, such as Mr. Bradley, force for reformed market behavior through demand for the food product, animals. Singer and Mason spend considerable time at Mr. Bradley farm to expose the

The impacts of livestock on global climate change are important to the health of the ecosystem because it causes the average global temperature to increase. Livestock contributes to the majority of methane emitted into the atmosphere because of the feces it produces. The growing population increase is not helpful to this matter because as a result, a demand of food arises. This demand for food also includes the demand for livestock because it is appropriate for the human diet. “Meat production is to double from 229 million tonnes in [2000] to 465 million tonnes in 2050” (McMichael et al. 1259). The methane emission rate is bound to increase because it is “dependent upon the population size of the [livestock], their productivity, and [handling system]” (Jose et al. 3).

When considering the challenges and opportunities posed by EU non market policies, we must look at both the food producer and the manufacturer as both can have positive and negative reactions. Going forward, global warming is now high on the agenda of policy makers. With agriculture a high contributor, it is unsurprising that measures are being introduced that have effect on the producers’ and manufacturers’. The buzz word now associated with the future of the environment and the food industry is “sustainability”. This refers to sustainable growth as the producers (farmers) try to maximise output. Moreover, with world populations set to dramatically increase up to 2050, the EU and the world must find ways to promote food production. Therefore, policies are now becoming more difficult and multifunctional. This is symbolised through the increasing awareness of the environment and it becoming more and more apparent in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). “The industry realises the need to protect and, where possible, improve biodiversity. Given that the industry’s raw materials are grown in the natural environment, and the industry purchases and processes 70% of EU agricultural production, it is essential that agricultural practices are sustainable.” FoodDrink Europe. (2011). It is here in the CAP that I have found non-market policies to have impacted both positively and, at times, negatively on the food producers and manufacturers operating in the EU. The