The Nuclear Ship Issue Of New Zealand Essay

Nuclear power plants should be legal in Australian as they pose many advantages. Such as high money income and cleaner power source than coal power. This essay will argue that nuclear power plants in Australia should be legalised.

Andrew Bolt’s article ‘French connection is one we cannot trust’ (Northern Territory News, May 2 2016, p. 13) criticises the $50 billion dollar agreement between Australia and France to construct twelve French-designed submarines for the Royal Australian Navy in Adelaide. Bolt claims that this agreement with France poses a risk to Australia’s defence interests. His line of reasoning is that France has proven itself in the past to be an unreliable ally. The evidence lies in France’s past actions of withholding its armaments and spare parts to nations engaged in conflicts opposed to its national interests. Therefore, Bolt argues that the agreement should have been made between Australia and its more reliable allies such as Japan and the

A treaty was initially established in San Francisco in 1951 however it came into force on the 29 April 1952 between Australia, New Zealand and the United States of America, which is referred to as the ANZUS Treaty. This was created to reinforce Australia and New Zealand’s National Security and increase Australia’s ability to protect itself and its interests. Since the Treaty the defence interactions have always remained solid with Australia however interactions with New Zealand had change in 1985 when New Zealand refused access to the USA to use its ports with nuclear weapons and the USA suspending its Treaty

The concept of a submersible boat has existed since the late 1500s, with the first working submarine constructed in 1623 by Cornelius Drebbel (Harris 2015). Since then the complexity of submarine technology has greatly evolved, largely due to funding by various militaries across the world. The first two Australian Submarines were commissioned in 1914 and deployed during World War 1, with both submarines lost during the conflict (Australian Submarine Corporation n.d.). As of 2015 the Royal Australian Navy’s submarine fleet consists of 6 Collins class submarines, but arrangements are being made by the Government for a new state of the art submarine fleet to be constructed (McPhedran 2014). Although one of the specifications that the government has stated about their planned submarines is that they cannot be nuclear powered, this investigation will look into whether this guideline is necessary or suitable for the next generation of Australian submarines. The focus question for this investigation is “Would it be beneficial for Australia to acquire and use Nuclear Powered Submarines?”

The development of nuclear weapons through-out the cold war period, had led the world to believe that a nuclear war was soon on its way. The evolution of nuclear testing and the Cuban missile crisis indicated how far each state was ready to go to ensure their ideological interests were pursued and at the same time their global superpower status was retained. Such techniques depicted "peace" as simply an expression with no significance. However, measures were established to guarantee the acceleration of nuclear weapons was controlled and didn 't get out of hand. The marking of different arms treaties and limit arrangements demonstrated co-operation between the two superpowers, bringing about no immediate clash, guaranteeing peace was kept and war was prevented. ‘’War would now be disastrous for either side and therefore peace was necessary and possible’’ (Kennedy-pipe, 2007, p.122).

According to the Arms Control Association, as of 2013 there was roughly 15,494 deployed and non deployed nuclear warheads between the five nuclear weapon states. The argument of whether or not nuclear weapons should be reduced in the United States is starting to arise. Nuclear weapons have the power to kill millions of people and lots of land. This is an issue that can’t be ignored. Nuclear weapons should be reduced in the United States because it’s a danger to the world and could ruin this Earth and eventually its people.

Recently in the news there have been numerous articles that are expressing the concern over North Korea's and Iran's nuclear weapon plans and programs. Nuclear weapons should not be used against terrorists or any other nation. The reason I chose the topic nuclear weapons is because Nuclear weapons will shape people's futures everywhere and they will be shaped by the decisions. I will be looking at two articles that talk about Nuclear weapons, one from http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/ and another from www.tsarbomba.org. Both articles are trying to inform the audience and I will evaluate how well they achieve this goal.

The United Kingdom has found itself at a pinnacle point in its impending security needs with regards to its nuclear deterrent. There have been various debates held by the government, to date, no decision has been made by the Prime Minister and Parliament with regards to nuclear deterrent, in respect to the Trident nuclear weapon system and its replacement (the Successor programme) that is needed to maintain the United Kingdom’s nuclear security. It is a responsibility of the Government to provide for the continuous security of the United Kingdom and its citizens, not only in the present day but in the future; but does a nuclear deterrent have a place in the Governments future security plans.

Nuclear power is by no means a new technology, in fact research began in 1895 when Wilhelm Rontgen discovered ionising radiation (World Nuclear Association, 2014). Research progressed through different phases, firstly focussed on the development of the atomic bomb and then onto controlled use of nuclear power for ship propulsion and the production of energy by way of nuclear power plants (World Nuclear Association, 2014). There was a period of stagnation in technological development regarding nuclear power until recently, with scientists now again looking into molten salt reactors (MSR’s) as an innovative way to increase safety while also making nuclear reactors more economically viable and greener (Freed, 2014). This essay will provide a brief history of nuclear energy, as well as looking at the role nuclear power could play in future energy production, whilst also looking at societal implications of this controversial technology. It will also look at potential progress traps and progress experiments if this technology was to be pursued.

Three Mile Island is a nuclear generation facility located about three miles in the Susquehanna River, South of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania in the Londonderry Township in the United State of America. The facility has two separate units, three miles Island One (TMI1) and the Three mile Island two (TMI2).

The world as we know today is dependent on energy. The options we have currently enable us to produce energy economically but at a cost to the environment. As fossil fuel source will be diminishing over time, other alternatives will be needed. An alternative that is presently utilized is nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is currently the most efficacious energy source. Every time the word ‘nuclear’ is mentioned, the first thought that people have is the devastating effects of nuclear energy. Granting it does come with its drawbacks; this form of energy emits far less pollution than conventional power plants. Even though certain disadvantages of nuclear energy are devastating, the advantages contain even greater rewards.

The UK civil nuclear power industry initially started in 1946 followed by the establishment of one of the world’s first nuclear power plant in 1956 [23-24]. This commercial scale reactor was built in southwest Scotland and given a name “MAGNOX” due to the fuel cladding (magnesium non-oxidising alloy) used to contain the fuels. The MAGNOX reactor uses natural uranium metal fuel to generate thermal energy while using graphite bricks to moderate the fast moving neutrons within the core. Two types of graphite bricks are used in MAGNOX design; these are Pile Grade A (PGA) and Pile Grade B (PGB). The former is used as a neutron moderator due to its high density and lower neutron absorption, whereas the latter is mostly used as a reflector [23].

usually would only happen in a time of crises, this is why shields are so highly

an article on the fortune in selling HEU. On October 9, 1992 he was apprehended