Essay about The Nullification Crisis

Correspondingly, there was the quarrel over state versus federal rights. States felt they didn’t have any say if they disliked a federal law. So when all these compromises came about concerning slavery in the West, people wanted to be able to nullify federal laws. To nullify is to cancel, and in this case to cancel a federal law. People like John C. Calhoun fought for this right along with many others. However, the federal government felt this was not necessary, therefore, some states threatened to secede.

The Nullification Crisis was significant. The Nullification Crisis started in 1828 when the Congress passed a very high tariff on manufactured goods from Europe. The Southerners started protesting against tariffs and called to secede from the United States. Since anger of tariffs continued to build in the South, the Congress passed a new, lower tariff in 1832, hoping that the protest in the South would die down. However, the South Carolina legislature passed the Nullification act, an act refusing to pay the “illegal” tariffs of 1828 and 1832. If the federal government interfered then the South will continue calling for secession and the union will split apart. The significance of the Nullification Crisis was that it caused President Jackson

To avoid military confrontation, Congress passed a different tariff that South Carolina was able to accept. The South took such measures because they felt that the North (Washington) was attacking them by passing laws that favored one section of the country’s economy over theirs. South Carolina later repealed their Nullification

During the late 1820s, John C. Calhoun believed that the tariff of 1816 was responsible for the decline of the South Carolina economy. Calhoun believed that if he developed the Theory of Nullification people in his home state would view him differently. The Theory of Nullification is the idea that states (unions) have the rights to void any law that is created by the government that is seen unconstitutional. States are the foundation of the Union, so they have the power to refuse any unconstitutional laws, and really states usually have the final say. What really caused the Nullification Crisis were many series of Protective Tariffs. Protective Tariffs are taxes placed on imported goods that are from foreign countries and their duty is to raise the price of foreign goods, making them less attractive to consumers protecting them from foreign competition such as; The Tariff of 1816 that placed a 20-25 percent tax on foreign goods, The Tariff of 1824 which placed a 35 percent duty tax on imported iron, wool, hemp, and cotton, finally the Tariff of 1828 which is also known as the Tariff of Abominations it was the third protective tariff and increased taxes to almost 50 percent.

The Nullification Crisis of 1832 is one of the crises that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Following the suffering of an economic downturn throughout the 1820s, the United States government passed several new tariffs. When the Tariff of 1828 was passed by the Congress of the United States on May 19, 1828, it sparked the debate over states’ rights and highlighted the growing sectional difference between the South and the North in America.

When Andrew Jackson took office in 1829, he was forced to respond to the growing conflict over tariffs. Vice President John C. Calhoun joined his fellow southerners in protest when Congress passed the Tariff of Abominations. In response to the tariff, Calhoun drafted the South Carolina Exposition and Protest. It urged states to nullify the Tariff of Abominations and used it to argue that since the states created the national government they decided when the national laws apply. Calhoun’s theory was controversial, and it drew some fierce challengers. Many of them were from the northern states that had benefited from increased tariffs. These opponents believed that the American people, not the individual states, made up the Union. Conflict between the supporters and the opponents of nullification deepened. The issue of nullification was intensely debated in the Senate, between Robert Y. Hayne and Daniel Webster. Hayne, senator from South Carolina, defended states’ rights. He argued that nullification gave states a way to lawfully

Nullification Crisis was a political crisis that happen back in 1812 to 1813 in the United States. Andrew Jackson’s vice president and a native of South Carolina, proposed the theory of nullification, which declared the tariff unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable The Nullification Crisis created tensions because they raised prices on manufactured goods, which benefited the domestic manufacturing industry in the North but was bad for Southern slaveholders, who had to pay higher prices for goods was a problem between South Carolina and the federal government. Sothern’s said that the Tariffs of 1832 were unconstitutional and therefore and they have to be annulated. The Nullification Crisis happen because the United States had a bad moment in the economy since it went down in the late 1820’s. They also feared that foreign countries would enact higher tariffs on raw materials produced in the South. Moreover, because the British reduced their exports to the United States in response to the tariff, they had less money to pay for US imports, especially cotton from the South. The tariff of 1828 raised taxes on imported manufactures to reduce foreign competition with American manufacturing. Southerners, argued that the tariff enhanced the interests of the Northern manufacturing industry at their expense. In 1828, during the presidency of John Quincy Adams, the first protective tariff was passed, the first legislation that included an even higher tariff,

In a world where there will always be constant opposition, humanity must learn to use it as a weapon rather than a weakness. The stronger an individual or in this case a nation is, the more challenges and trials one must face. As the federal government’s power increased, the more rebellion and revolution surfaced. Many will say that the more power equaled less problems. However, that is simply untrue, because someone will always have to make a choice, like how as long as there is strength in this world, there will be a vulnerability to overcome. For example, the Whiskey Rebellion and the Nullification Crisis were determining factors of how opposition will come as long as there is power in the midst. Therefore, these two specific historical markers help show the true colors of a nation through the motives and effectiveness of federal power and constant opposition. In every abyss of darkness, there will be a light to shine through and break that barrier. History is what makes the world’s character as well the inhabitants that remain within. The Whiskey Rebellion was a way for people who appear as commoners to finally take a stand against the government, especially Alexander Hamilton’s taxes that were being put into place. Which brings the other tipping point, which is known as the Nullification Crisis, it gave the federal government a wake-up call, for it showed no matter how much power increased, there will always be a voice out there ready to be heard. And the Nullification

The Tariff of 1828 raised taxes and the Southerners did not like this at all. South Carolina threatened to leave the union if the taxes were not lowered. Calhoun wanted to nullify the taxes in South Carolina, but Jackson threatened to bring military forces to South Carolina to solve the problem.

Tariffs plagued the president also many times, but the most remembered were the “Tariff of Abominations” in 1828, and the tariff of 1832. South Carolina passed an Ordinance of Nullification, and upset Jackson tremendously. They stated that those tariffs were null and void to South Carolina, and it would be unlawful to collect for duties. They also had the nerve to warn the

In fact, Clay is named "The Great Compromiser" due to his work in the Missouri Compromise, the compromise of the Nullification Crisis, and the Compromise of 1850. It is likely that after being in the role of a peacemaker for such a great deal of time, Henry Clay may have been tired of facilitating these compromises. For the Nullification Crisis, Clay first pressured Congress in 1832 for a new tariff bill that would lower the rates of the Tariff of 1828, however the South still thought that it was too high. Upon Jackson gaining the ability from Congress to use military force to enforce the tariff, Henry Clay once again acted as a peacemaker. Clay revised the tariff bill with a compromise bill, allowing the South to keep their pride while still forcing them to back down to Congress and Jackson’s power as President. Thus, Henry Clay was able to keep the two parties together by maintaining a neutral perspective. There are a variety of elements which enhance the portrayal of this situation as a meme. While Clay was more a political figure than a farmer, the exaggeration of Clay's portrayal as a farmer symbolizes who Clay represented and spoke for: the

He promised the south a reduction in the taxes and duties they were enduring to the levels first established in1828. These set levels were acceptable to the southerners as opposed to the higher rates enforced since then. In 1832 Jackson reduced these rates by a small margin, not nearly as much as his original promise. Regardless of South Carolina upset, in 1833 Jackson passed the Force Bill. This coerced them into paying the tariff no matter what.4

The Nullification Crisis was a major political crisis that began with the Tariff of Abominations of 1828, which occurred during the presidency of Andrew Jackson involving a conflict with the United States Federal Government and South Carolina. South Carolina felt the Tariff was unconstitutional and

Many politicians also made attempts to either increase states rights or to increase those of the federal government. The debate over states rights led to a further division in political ideologies and consequently strengthened the two-party system. One such debate was over the Maysville Road Bill. When Jackson vetoed the bill to appropriate federal funds to repair an interstate road, it marked an enormous setback for nationalism and also the American System. His states' rights partiality angered Henry Clay and other believers in the American system because the veto attacked one of the major components of the system, a strong infrastructure including roads. Another issue dealing with the rights of the state governments that divided the nation political was South Carolina's Ordinance of Nullification. In reaction to the burden that the Tariff of Abominations placed upon the farmers of South Carolina, the state utilized its right to nullify the federal law. In nullifying the tariff, South Carolina took a bold step to declare its governmental rights. Jackson's hostile reaction to the South Carolinians created a growing political division, strengthening the imminent separation

In 1787, the creation of the U.S. Constitution would grant the national government dominance over the states. However, the southerners still felt that they should be able determine whether or not they accepted certain acts, and the idea of nullification was proposed. John C. Calhoun was first to present the states right to nullify, or ignore federal laws in which they disagreed, in his doctrine.[6] Things seemed to have remained calm until the commencement of Lincoln’s presidency when nullification was no longer allowed.