The Obligation For Educate And Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

This paper will begin by first providing you with key terms and background knowledge of the current situation. Next, important positions will be outlined along with data that supports those positions. To thoroughly explain the important positions, opposing views will be discussed along with rebuttals to those views. The paper concludes with a summary of the argument and a call to action with possible future research.

This question requires you to integrate a variety of sources into a coherent, well-written essay. Refer to the sources to support your position; avoid mere paraphrase or summary. Your argument should be central; the sources should support this argument.

Provide an appropriate, explicitly stated thesis that directly addresses all parts of the question and does NOT simply restate the question.

| Demonstrates some understanding of descriptive and value assumptions and value conflicts, identifies some and provides satisfactory explanation of their effect on the argument. May have some confusion over definitions, but generally demonstrates understanding of the concepts.

| The argument is presented in a logical order that shows clear expression of ideas. All supporting facts and statistics are

The purpose of this assignment is to make us capable to argue our claims with evidences. Moreover, it also learnt to be aware of the other side of the argument by writing the counter argument.

While researching this paper I came across a very interesting article. In the November 2000 issue of Reason magazine, Michael McMenamin leads with the following paragraph:

This case was prepared by Associate Professor Marc L. Lipson. It was written as a basis for class discussion rather

This article critically examines the ways in which individuals could help reduce the impacts of global warming. The author challenges that every individual could significantly minimise the effects of global warming by adopting to a more responsible lifestyle.

All the claims made by the author, while demonstrating good intentions, have valid counter arguments against them that he failed to address or acknowledge.

respectively of which both will be discussed in depth during this essay to provide an

In this written report, I will be including both sides of the argument which enable me to form my opinion as well as conclusion.

In this paper I will summarize the article and give analysis on key points that drive the main arguments in

Sources for this paper include articles, books, and websites. Terms will be defined as the arguments are presented.

This paper tends to summaries the main arguments and approaches of Mankiw, Rome and Weil (1992, MRW hereafter) and Manuelli and Seshadri (2005, MS hereafter), also compares and contrast their main findings. Finally, the paper will give some brief comments and criticisms on these two papers.