Summary
The omnipotent view of management says that managers are directly responsible for the success or failure of an organization. This is a dominate view in management theory and society in general. The symbolic view of management takes the view much of an organization’s success or failure is due to external forces outside the manager’ control. The view of managers as omnipotent is consistent with the stereotypical picture of the take-charge executive who can overcome any obstacle in carrying out the organization’s objectives.
The symbolic view organizational results as being influenced by factors outside the control of managers: economy, customers, governmental policies, competitors’ actions, the state of the particular industry,
…show more content…
Discuss the impact of a strong culture on organizations and managers. Explain the source of an organization 's culture. Describe how culture is transmitted to employees. Describe how culture affects managers.
The seven dimensions (see Exhibit 3-2) are as follows: (1) attention to detail (degree to which employees are expected to exhibit precision, analysis, and attention to detail); (2) outcome orientation (degree to which managers focus on results or outcomes rather than on how those outcomes are achieved); (3) people orientation (degree to which management decisions take into account the effects on people in the organization); (4) team orientation (degree to which work is organized around teams rather than individuals); (5) aggressiveness (degree to which employees are aggressive and competitive rather than cooperative); (6) stability (degree to which organizational decisions and actions emphasize maintaining the status quo); and (7) innovation and risk taking (degree to which employees are encouraged to be innovative and to take risks).
Research results are suggesting that in organizations with strong cultures: employees tend to be more committed to their organizations; recruitment efforts and socialization practices are used to build employee commitment; and there is higher organizational performance. The impact of a strong culture on managers is that as the culture becomes stronger, it has an
• The Symbolic Framework draws on social and cultural anthropology. The organization is thought to be akin to tribes or theater; they are cultures that operate based on ceremonies, rituals, rules, myths, policies, stories, heroes and managerial authority (Bolman and Deal 1991, p. 16). Everyone in the organization is an actor who is basically playing a prescribed role (Bolman and Deal 1991, p. 16).
* People Shape the Culture. Personalities and experiences of employees create the culture of an organization. For example, if most of the people in an organization are very outgoing, the culture is likely to be open and sociable. If many artifacts depicting the company’s history and values are in evidence throughout the company, people value their history and culture. If doors are open, and few closed door meetings are held, the culture is unguarded. If negativity about supervision and the company is widespread and complained about by employees, a culture of negativity, that is difficult to overcome, will take hold.
There is no “one size fits all” when it comes to structure and culture within an organization since industries and situations can vary. Furthermore, if an organization wants to improve its effectiveness and performance, their organizational culture needs to be strong and provide a strategic competitive advantage when it comes to its beliefs, and values. Organizations can differentiate itself from one another by those that do not have structure and culture. It is important to know that employees in all organizations want to work in an environment of trust and respect where they
A good culture encompassing strong values, vision, morale’s and beliefs and behaviours expressed by employers and employees of an organisation can be the driver of the overall performance of a company. A good culture can help support the implementation of changes and new initiatives and are likely to be supported by those involved.
A company’s culture can have a huge impact on employment relations. If the organisation encourages staff to be engaged and involved in how business is delivered, they are more likely to be motivated and productive and retention will be higher. Creating a good reputation outside the business can also help with future recruitment.
Not only is a strong corporate culture good for business by increasing customer satisfaction, it also can help to decrease turnover and save on human resources expenditures. Internal integration should start the minute a new employee enters a company. Training of new employees should include some way of helping them to understand the company's culture. The new hire training program currently in use at Wal-Mart stores includes videos and other information about the founding of the company as well as other general and specific information about the company's culture as well as expectations related to this culture. This is important because a company's culture is not always easily apparent to newcomers and this is what keeps Wal-mart's culture strong (Berg, 2001).
Organizational culture can be values, beliefs and norms which define how members think, feel and behave. More specifically, organizational culture is defined as shared philosophies, ideologies, beliefs, feelings, assumptions, expectations, attitudes, norms, and values (Schein, 2011). It is important to understand organizational culture has tremendous influence on its members, their views of the workplace, their efforts and their productivity. Culture is created by leaders, members and the environment in which the organization finds itself in. However, I believe it is primary the leadership’s responsibility to uphold the standards of a positive culture. As leaders, we must understand the culture we’ve created and how to maintain it or improve it. The Debra Woog McGinty and Nicole C. Moss corporate survey exhibited I’m in an Established/Stable culture.
The sustained superior financial performance of a firm’s excellent management can be communicated through the managerial view of organisational culture, where strong culture can evidently been seen as the endeavour to an organisation’s success. (Barney 1986) emphasises the need for strong culture not only to enhance the firm’s performance, but it is also vital in improving employee morale or quality of work life. Due to the relationship between conflicts in the workplace originated from poor management, culture’s diverse values, assumptions, beliefs and symbols interweave the affiliation between employees and management. Culture therefore, aids in the behaviour which allows the increasing progress of economic value and sustained superior financial performance to the firm thus, benefiting their interest in profit maximisation (Ulrich & Brockman 2005). The progress of this management has been assisted by the careful selection and recruitment of employees through valid and reliable methods (Carmeli & Tishler 2004), with training and development in order to maintain this performance in the work organisation. Likewise, Westco, of the top five food retailing organisations in the UK is
The single most critical problem that the managers are facing today is managing the people.This is the most challenging issues that every kind of organizations is dealing with now aday. Organizational behaviour is the study of individual, group and organization as a whole that examines the effect of organizational structure and culture on organizational performance. Therefore, it mostly tries to define the performance and efficiency factors of anorganization.Organizational structure and organizational culture are highly correlated performance factors.It basically defines the appropriate structure of an organization in order to get more thanaverage performance. Organizational culture is a primary factor for employee turnover and job satisfaction (Bolden, 2004). If an organization possesses a strong culture of self-respect and employee affiliation, it is no wonder that the employee retention rate would be very high(Tracy, 2013).In this report, the relationship between organizational culture and organizational structure will be pointed out. While doing so we
An organization’s culture governs day to day behavior. This type of power may be seen as a control mechanism, which businesses use to manipulate internal and external perception. Every organization has a set of assumed understandings that must be adopted and implemented by new employees in order for them to be accepted. Conformity to the culture becomes the primary basis for reward by the organization. “The role of culture in influencing employee behavior appears to be increasingly important in today’s workplace, as organizations have widened spans of control, flattened structures, introduced teams, reduced
Strong culture is said to exist where staff respond to stimulus because of their alignment to organizational values. Conversely, there is Weak Culture where there is little alignment with organizational values and control must be exercised through extensive procedures and
The culture of an organization has a great impact in the productivity of the employees and influence the individual behavior of the
A strong positive organizational culture develops from employee awareness of the distinct differences between their company and other companies along with company mindfulness and embracing cultural diversity of its employees. As long as the organizational uniqueness of companies is positive, company pride among employees expands and improves the employees’ willingness to learn. Conversely, disinterested employees lack commitment to their company and lack desire to learn, making training more difficult.
Whatever the outcome at the end of the day, it is the manager who is responsible. This means that rather than forces or facts, it is people that manage; and the perception, commitment and accountability of managers are the determining factors of success of failure when it comes to management. Therefore, it can be deduced that managers act or execute plans but it is management that determines if goals are going to be achieved or not by bringing people and tasks together (Drucker, 2012). Management is what holds an institution together and makes it work (Drucker, 2012).