The Ongoing Debate Of Abortion

The issue of Abortions has been a controversy for years now. There are two main groups for this problem, Pro-Life, and Pro-Choice. Pro-Life supports the human rights of life should be embraced, by religion and ethics. Pro-choice is when someone wants to make this choice without no remorse of human life, but because someone wants no part of it raising one.

The conflict with anti-abortion laws were presented to the United States Supreme Court in 1973. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court reviewed a Texas law in which criminalized abortion. The Texas statute stated that any abortion procedure is illegal, unless it is “an abortion procured or attempted by medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother” (Roe v. Wade, 1973). The plaintiff in this case, Jane Roe argued that the law was unconstitutional. She wanted to terminate her pregnancy by means of abortion performed by a competent, licensed physician, and under safe and clinical conditions. Roe was unauthorized to have a legal abortion because her life was not endangered in having the child. However, she could not afford to travel to a jurisdiction that allowed a safe and legal abortion. Roe argued that the Texas statute violated her right to personal privacy which is protected by the First,

Every culture and society does not allow or consider abortion as a rightful act, and abortion is a name of destroying human life. Now a days our society faces several types of issues Abortion is one of the complicated issue for both ways health and society that’s why abortion become a very controversial issue that’s become debatable in politics. In addition, these researches will describe the different issues of abortion, such as, legal laws on abortion, restriction of abortions, rate of abortion and consequences of the abortion.

In 1973, a woman named Norma McCorvey used an alias, Jane Roe, to pursue an appeal to a state law in Texas declaring that she could not receive an abortion. At the time, the Texas law stated “only a life-saving procedure on behalf of the mother, without regard to pregnancy stage and without recognition of other interests involved.” The issue with this state statute, as claimed by the appellate Jane Roe, was that it violated her right to privacy, and the concept of personal liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. After being denied an abortion, Jane Roe carried the child to term and gave it up for adoption, then proceeded to take her claim to the Supreme Court. After much deliberation, interpretation of the Constitution, and scrutiny of the Texas statute, the justices ruled that abortions, done within the first trimester and with the judgment of a physician, are legal. This overrules the Texas statute, and sets a new precedent for the regulations of abortions.

In Roe v. Wade, Norma Mccorvey “Jane Roe” started federal action against the Dallas county, Texas district attorney, Henry Wade. Originally, Roe wanted a woman to be able to terminate any pregnancy at any time. The Supreme Court disagreed with Roe’s opinion, ending in a ruling where an abortion could happen before the end of the first trimester. This ruling also included ways to balance state interests with a woman’s right of privacy. In the final SCOTUS opinion, the majority states, “Statutes criminalizing abortion in most instances violated a woman’s constitutional right of privacy”(Roe v. Wade).The decision made by the Supreme Court explained that the many Texas statues making abortion criminal violated both the due process clause of the 14th amendment and a woman’s right of privacy. The lasting impact made by Roe v. Wade has increased the freedoms of women as well as set precedents for many cases regarding abortion and privacy.

On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Roe v. Wade, a challenge to a Texas statute that made it a crime to perform an abortion unless a woman’s life was at stake. The case had been filed by “Jane Roe,” an unmarried woman who wanted to safely and legally end her pregnancy. Siding with Roe, the court struck down the Texas law. The Court argued that the Constitution's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual's privacy rights against state laws and cited past cases ruling that marriage, contraception, and child rearing are activities covered in this "zone of privacy." The Court then argued that the "zone of privacy" was "broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate

In the 1973 Roe v. Wade case, a young, unmarried, pregnant woman, given the alias “Jane Roe,” was denied the right to an abortion under Texas law. She argued that this was unconstitutional and violated her right to privacy. Although the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Roe’s favor, there were stipulations put into place to protect human life.

In the twentieth century many states passed laws that outlawed abortions unless a mother’s life was in danger. Many people felt that banning birth control and abortion was an invasion of privacy. Jane Roe, which was not her real name, wanted to have an abortion. Since Texas law prohibits this, she filled a lawsuit against, Wade, the district attorney. Roe argued that the law violated the Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection Clause, “no state shall deprive a person of life liberty or property” and a woman’s rights to privacy in the First,

This case was about a pregnant mother, that wished to undergo an abortion in Texas because she could not afford to go somewhere else for the medical procedure. Jane Roe sued on behalf of ever women to prevent the enforcement of Texas statutes criminalizing all abortions except those performed to save the life of the mother. Jane Roe sought a declaratory judgment that the statutes were unconstitutional vague and abridged her right of personal privacy, protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The right to personal privacy includes the abortion decision, but the right is not unqualified and must be considered against important state interests in regulation.

To begin with, there has always been a huge issue with the topic of abortion, why? Well, it’s a tough subject and can get extremely emotional and very defensive. Honestly, people just need to open up their eye’s and understand that it's murder and not just a choice. It is murder because two can create a blessing and the choice of aborting it, is more like a sacrifice for the reason a mother can’t carry a baby for nine months. Whether a person is a teen, young adult, or an adult and is in a horrible situation that believes they cannot proceed with the pregnancy, they should know there are other options. Teens aborting an unborn baby is not a choice and should be banned because it is wrong without parental consent, the rights of a child, and

The issue of abortion is has been widely debated for many years and still continues to lead headlines today. It sparks debates in classrooms, courtrooms, and family rooms across the country as the issue is so complex, there are a variety of views and responses to its morality and legality. To understand the current debate over the issues concerning abortion we must not look at this issue from a black and white perspective of what is right and what is wrong , but rather we must take a comprehensive approach which analyzes the complex questions and factors tied to the morality of abortion. By looking at the responses to the question of abortion, as discussed by Mary Anne Warren, Judith Jarvis Thomson, and Don Marquis, we might better understand on how to respond to this issue in terms of what we think and why others assert the view that they do. A comprehensive understanding of the many issues tied to abortion allows one to most successfully defend their beliefs on this complex issue.

Even though the controversial conversation of abortion somewhat prohibits the open talk of there being other reasons that would make abortion essential and sometimes critical to the health of the mother. There are several reasons women are seeking and have sought abortions and were denied or otherwise restricted to laws and/or regulations. Rebecca Traister, senior editor of New Republic magazine, wrote in an editorial about her pregnancy and in her twenty fourth week (which in New York is the point of no return if you weren’t considering keeping the baby) she had thoughts of concern that if there were medical, fiscal or some other event that would cause more damage to not abort. This was a worry of hers, not only for herself but for other women who never had a chance, or choice, at all.

American suffragist Elizabeth Cady Stanton once said, “When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit” (Jenson). The pro-life vs. pro-choice abortion debate has always been a controversial topic in politics as well as the field of women’s health care. Many on the pro-choice side of the issue cite a woman’s right to make decisions for her own body as justification to continue the practice of abortion. The pro-life argument is that a woman and her child are separate entities and should be treated as such. Although legally and socially accepted in the United States, abortion asserts that a mother’s right to terminate

Abortion is a controversial issue in many countries all the time and there are always two sides of abortion. Pro-life supporters believe that abortion is immoral, so they argue that it should be illegal because an unborn baby is life. However, they do not figure out that woman who is on the inevitable situation such as infection, rape, or extreme poverty would still have the abortion even though the abortion is illegal. Many women die due to unsafe abortion, which is illegal and performed by uneducated people. Therefore, the abortion should be legal to protect the life of ‘alive women’ because women’s life is equal to human’s right. I would like to provide more affirmative bases to support abortion in this paper.

You hear of all these controversial issues floating around conversation. One that always catches my ear is the debate on abortion. Growing up in a republican household, and catholic for that matter, it was obvious that “pro-life” would be imprinted into my head. My whole family, not just my parents, are against abortion. Also going to church every Sunday and learning what my religion thought was right and wrong influenced me to believe that abortion was killing a life. Since I grew up with this influence I subconsciously thought that is what is right side of the argument to believe. I was always a strong believer in that an abortion was the killing of a human life and was morally wrong. All the way up until junior year in high school I actually considered myself an advocate of the term “pro-life.” As a growing teenager at the time I was looking for freedom. I couldn’t find it too much, but after taking numerous political classes I found myself in the middle of the political spectrum. Not republican, similar to my family, but stuck between both parties. I found that with certain issues I was republican such as not wanting gun control and others I was democratic such as pro-choice. When it comes to the issue of pro-life or pro-choice I now find myself leaning the opposite direction of my previous beliefs. The reason I went from pro-life to pro-choice is because as I grew older I became more interested in politics and stared to look into highly debated issues. I know that I