The Ontological Argument Analysis

opinions of what God is truly like and if He exists as the greatest being in reality. Many different views of this argument are included in John Feinberg and Russ Shafer- Landau’s Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy which helps to gain a broad perspective on the claims that notable philosophers have made. Specifically, there is The Ontological Argument, from Proslogion by Anselm of Canterbury in which he defends the existence of God using faith and reason. God exists

Many different philosophers have argued the existence of God in the form of ontological arguments. The first philosopher to make such argument is Saint Anselm of Canterbury. St. Anselm argued that God is “something than which nothing greater can be imagined” (Barnes). He believed that there was nothing in this world whose existence and understanding could be imagined to be greater than the existence of God and that even a fool would agree that there is something in this universe in which nothing

philosophers standpoint this argument can be fought at so many perspectives. Whether it comes from Darwinism, to Cosmological, or Ontological arguments the existence of God can only be decided by free will. As technology improves more questions are raised for the existence of God, but when broken down into simpler of terms the existents of God is evident. My first argument to be stated for the existence of God is that of the Ontological Argument. The Ontological argument is that of which states the

In the Proslogion written by Anselm of Canterbury, Anselm gives his ontological argument of how God exists. This essay explains that Anselm’s argument of God’s existence works. In particular, I will show that Anselm’s ontological argument makes sense by showing that the statements that logically contribute to the existence of God. In Anselm’s ontological argument, he states that God means something than which greater can be thought. In other words, “God is whatever it is better to be than not

September 2011 Analysis to Anselm’s Ontological Argument and the Argument from Evil The debate of the existence of God had been active since before the first philosopher has pondered the question. Anselm’s Ontological Argument was introduced during the 11th century and had stood deductively valid until the 18th century. Then there are the arguments to aim disprove God, such as the Argument from Evil. The Ontological argument is an a priori deductive argument. That is, an argument relating

Title: Critical analysis of Ontological argument and the argument against it. Name: Ankit Mittal Roll no.: 13110012 Word Count: Existence of God, is one of the most complicated and debatable philosophical topic. Many of us believe in its existence and many do not. To start with, using the word ‘fact’ to prove or disprove the God’s existence is inappropriate because till now neither theists had come up with a solid proof of god’s existence nor atheists had been able to prove their argument. There are

actually exis yvice o t eft result, they contain within them the potency to make possible even the represent one's mind, thereby giving shape to a green, triangle-shaped object in the itnaginatii,n. l; same way, the causality implied in the ontological argument means that our v .,‘ ideahu , most basic grounding in reality. That which representative reality parallels is referred to Descartes as a "higher form." This "higher form" may give us further insight into the character of God. (Fifth Meditation)

Kalyn Crocetti kalyn Professor Payne Philosophy 101 April 27, 2015 The Ontological Argument: Mackie vs. Plantinga Omnibenevolent means to be all loving or infinitely good. It is usually used when talking about God (Omnibenevolent Dictionary Definition). If God is omnibenevolent, then why is there still evil in our world? Two very influential people that have attempted to answer this question are Alvin Plantinga and John Leslie Mackie. Alvin Plantinga is an American philosopher who is known for

Heidegger, Kant, and the Ontological Argument In the introduction to The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Martin Heidegger explains that throughout the history of philosophy, there has been many discoveries of the “domains of being” viz., “nature, space, and soul”. However, none of these discoveries could be appreciated in a way that clarifies “their specific being.” As an example, Heidegger interprets this problem, as the reason Plato understood why the soul, along with its logos, was a different

Number - SYBSAM001 Course code - PHI1024F Course Lecturer – Dean Chapman Tutor – Kajal Carr Does the Ontological Argument successfully show that God exists? God – “a being of which nothing greater can be conceived.” (Blackburn, S, 1999. Think. New York United States of America, Oxford University Press Inc. 5:154) The ontological argument put forward by St Anselm, is based on this definition. The argument, Anselm’s premises, the concept of god being understood, god existing in the understanding and god