The Organizing Function of Management at Google

In this paper we will examine the management style of Google Inc. We will also evaluate two key changes in the selected company's management style from the company's inception to the current day. Indicate whether or not you believe the company is properly managed. As well as explain senior management's role in preparing the organization for its most recent change. Provide evidence of whether the transition was seamless or problematic from a management perspective. Also we will evaluate management's decision on its use of vendors and spokespersons. Indicate the organizational impact of these decisions. And we will look

Today, Google, Inc. is worth more than General Motors, McDonald's and Disney combined, and the company continues to model the way in the global technology industry in which it competes. In fact, the company's name has become a verb and it is common practice for consumers to "Google" what they want to find online. To determine how Google, Inc. reached this dazzling level of performance in a relatively short period of time, this paper provides an analysis of the three external environments in which Google competes, the general environment, the industry environment and the competitor environment. Next, a discussion of two specific strategic issues as well as opportunities and threats that are facing Google, Inc. is followed by a summary of the research and important findings in the conclusion.

Google, Inc. is a corporation that is known for innovation and amazing leadership practices. Google’s greatest innovation may actually be its managerial practice. Google is not led by a single CEO, but by a team that gives it immense strategic and management strength. (Nussbaum, n.d.) Engineers at Google are able to work on their ongoing projects 4 days out of the 5 day work week, and one day a week is designated for potential ideas of their own choice. (Sawyer, 2009) Google has innovation reviews, where each executive presents the most promising ideas from within his own division. The CEO is at these innovation reviews to listen to these innovative ideas. Another way to ensure that some of these ideas have the opportunity to be developed is to allow the engineers to work on these ideas for more than one day a week and in some cases full time. Allowing time to be creative and develop ideas is embracing the art of innovation and

They have been on Fortune Magazines, 100 Best Companies to Work for the past nine years and ranked number 1 for the sixth consecutive year in a row (Fortune, 2015). Google's organizational is not typical, partly because of the firm's organization structure. Their structure and culture interact to influence the capabilities of the organization. Google follows a functional structure with management positions specialized by value chain activity. Google has a board of directors followed by the executive management group. Google divides its business into five categories: Engineering, Products, Sales, Legal, and Finance (Morrow, n.d.). The five divisions are broken down further but follow most corporate structures based on the product they are

Google Company is one of the global leaders in technology and in enabling people access information from the internet through their efficient search engines. Google immediately gained the attention of the internet sector for being a better search engine than its competitors (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2015). This was after a tremendous effort in marketing their services and capturing a large market worldwide. However, there being so many risks and challenges in this line of business Google has had the urge to come up with new strategies so that they are able to overcome any challenge before them. The major problem that Google has

Google is a multinational corporation that serves thousands of consumers worldwide. Through Internet related products such as Internet searches, maps, emails, mobile apps, and other online contents for users Google became the company it is today. Every employee of Google is different in his or her own way; making it a well-diversified organization similar to the global audience they serve. Google’s mission statement is to organize information from all around the world and make it universally accessible at a quick and orderly fashion. This means creating a search engine smart

Google defines itself as a non-conventional company which intentionally avoids the traditional management models. “Google has been managed differently in an atmosphere of creativity and challenge.” That said by Eric Schmidt, CEO, who also affirms that the business is driven according what Peter Drucker understood as a way to manage the “knowledge workers” in 1959. The idea was first described in his book 'The Landmarks of Tomorrow'.

The purpose of this project is to review Google and analyze it as a potential employer. Throughout the report, we will cover their financial status, the culture of the company, and the future outlook. Additionally, we will explore the benefits and incentives offered, and employment opportunities. Our main goal is to come to a general consensus of what the company stands for and if it would be considered a suitable employer.

Google’s organizational structure, like Zappos, is flat with low levels of management. Google encourages employees to take initiative without needing approval from multiple levels of managers. To inspire the spirit of innovation in its employees, Google came up with the 70-20-10 rule. Frenz (2013) states, “They have the freedom to spend 70 percent of their time on current assignments, 20 percent on related projects of their choosing, and 10 percent on new projects in any area they desire.” Employees have the freedom to set their own goals and change

I think that the most important aspect that you can take away from this article, and I can say from personal experience, is something that is very important in your job, is the managers and co-workers that you are involved with on an everyday basis. If you have good managers, you are going to like the job a lot more and want to stay there for a long time. If you are not fond of the mangers, or don’t like the work environment that they are operating under, it can make it very hard for you to come to work every day. The overall point of this article was in response to the program that Google created, called Project Oxygen, that’s main initiative is to consistently survey the employees on how their managers are performing, give feedback to those managers, and provide training so that Google is employing the best managers around. Google offers a very good overall package when it comes to how they run their company. Google operated under a “consensus drive” decision making model, which goes along with their original philosophy, to get everyone’s input on a certain situation, have everyone come up with possible solutions, and come to a compromised decision, and not just have one person calling all the shots. To make sure that Google was hiring the best people, they had a rigorous hiring process to make sure they had the top talent in

Garvin’s article How Google Sold Its Engineers on Management describes Google’s unique approach to management. Google prides itself with having the best, most highly satisfied employees in the industry. A majority of its employees are engineers that prefer spending time creating and building, which makes it difficult for management to exist. Many of Google’s employees are also highly independent and do not like being micromanaged. Garvin (2013) described a 2002 experiment where Google made their organization flat, eliminating engineering managers, the company realized that managers do more than just manage projects. Managers contributed to the company, “by communicating strategy, helping employees prioritize projects, facilitating

(Goodman, 2009) The company primarily focuses on search; advertising; consumer content and platforms; and enterprise products. Some of the core business practices of google include getting to know their employees, creating new ways to reward and promote their high-performing employees, letting their employees own the problems they want to solve, allowing employees to function outside the company’s hierarchy, and have their employees’ performance reviewed by someone they respect for their objectivity and impartiality. (Manimala, M.J. 2013) The employees can operate and experience a free and transparent exchange of ideas in order to best meet the needs of the people in which they serve. Google technology includes the Google Chrome browser, YouTube, Google Maps, Android smartphones and smart contact lenses. The company is also developing a self-driving car.  Overall, their managers trust them to carry out these responsibilities without micromanaging them and their core value is to create technology to make life easier and better for everyone.

This paper deliberates the internal and external factors about the Google industry, and the ways it affects the four functions of management. The internal factors include the company’s strength and weakness that displays their success or downfall. The internal factors reveal the company’s strength on how well it can meet their goals. The internal factors of an industry are factors of good or poor planning because it exposes their ethics, diversity, globalization, and so forth. On the other hand, the external factors may involve with their outside competition, social legal, technology changes, political, and economic environment. The external factors show their duties to

Google’s recruitment team is known for implementing an idiosyncratically intense hiring process. Every year Google receives over 3 million applications. But Google hires about only 7,000 or about 0.2%, said at LinkedIn’s recent Talent Conference by company’s HR boss Laszlo Bock, according to Quartz [1]. It is noticed that the hiring rate is lower than the acceptance rate of the top universities like Harvard, Stanford and MIT.

Google’s human relations and human resource management styles have changed the way that companies will be managed in the years to come. Google’s model of motivation and leadership tears down the traditional scientific management theory which focuses on results rather than the employees who deliver those results. The Vice President of People Development at Google stated that the company’s strives “to create the happiest, most productive workplace in the world. It’s less about the aspiration to be No.1 in the world, and more that we want our employees and future employees to love it here, because that’s what’s going to make us successful” (Smith,2014). Google shows employees they are valued and constantly motivates them in the workplace by creating a culture that fulfills their needs in all aspects. The office design, the management style, policies, and perks/benefits all put the employee first.