The Other Boleyn Girl
The two adaptations after the controversial novel “The Other Boleyn Girl” by Philippa Gregory present a historical fictional story of the Boleyn sisters, Anne and Mary. This is a ravishing, emotionally intense story of love, loyalty and betrayal in the chase for power and social position, portraying the human desires and flaws in a beautifully described historical background at the English court. The private life of the historical figures from the XVIth century and the intrigues hidden behind the official documents is quite an ambiguous, curiously challenging segment of time, from the historical point of view. The book, and the two film adaptations after – “The Other Boleyn Girl” explore the uncertain times in the
…show more content…
This brought controversies to the reception of the movie and some viewers rejected it because of this, especially if comparing the adaptation to the classical, colourful style of the book.
The second screening, from 2008 brings a complete different view comparing to the BBC version, addressing to a different audience, by presenting the plot in a more romantic, classical manner. This is the Hollywood version, staring famous actors like Natalie Portman (Anne Boleyn), Scarlett Johansson (Mary Boleyn), Eric Bana (Henry Tudor). The film is trying to recreate the atmosphere at the English royal court in the time of Henry the VIIIth by using bright, outrageous costumes, dramatic lighting and strong, emotionally involving scenes. The film is slightly approaching the political circumstances, but only in order to support the main plot. For example, when Anne and her family is waiting for the king’s decision whether to divorce Katherine of Aragorn or not, the scene is created from Anne’s point of view, showing her impatience, so that it builds up suspense. “this is a film for people who prefer their costume dramas to gallop along at marry old pace rather then get bogged down in historical detail” (Sukhdev Sandhu) The film also presents more perspectives –the Boleyn family, using their children to achieve favours from the king and financial
When novels are adapted for the cinema, directors and writers frequently make changes in the plot, setting, characterization and themes of the novel. Sometimes the changes are made in adaptations due to the distinctive interpretations of the novel, which involve personal views of the book and choices of elements to retain, reproduce, change or leave out. On the contrary, a film is not just an illustrated version of the novel; it is a totally different medium. When adapting the novel, the director has to leave out a number of things for the simple reason of time difference. Furthermore, other structures and techniques must be added to the film to enhance the beauty and impressions of it. Like a
As with every book and movie adaptation, there are differences. One of the most significant changes that affected the overall story was the loss of the first-person point of view aspects of the book. While reading the
with the stylistic and aesthetics of the dialogue in the movie. Most of the dialogue
One of the hardest things for a director to do is to turn a book into a movie. There is a fine line between keeping the movie just like the book, and by barely crossing that line you can end up making a completely different vision than the book has set out for you. There are also many viewers out there that will completely hate the movie if it is nothing like the book that they read originally. The director has to realize that although there are many different types of audiences to please, that it still has to be a great movie that people cannot stop talking about.
The British Isles, was a tense and troubled time in the late 1500 's/early 1600 's where the book is set. Anxiety arose between the Catholics and the Protestants, which would eventually lead to the English Civil War. Family feuds, politics, poverty, religion and views of witchcraft inflamed this
They may think that Horowitz would not enjoy the movie. Some people might point to the fact that many important details from his book were changed, as a negative. The movie didn’t have the quad part where Alex fought two killers on quads that tried to run him down. Alex would have died if it weren’t for luck and an electrical fence. Horowitz wouldn’t like this because it was an important part of the book that was taken out for the movie. But they are wrong because there were so many details that were the same, and also if they would have added a lot of other parts from the book such as the quad scene, the movie would have never
One major insult to the book from the movie comes with the fact that the motion picture ultimately changes the title of the entire work and thus changes the
When filmmakers of the 21st century write movie about a book almost every time they are different than the original book. Sometimes they change the book to make it more interesting, modern, or to save money and time. For example they sexualized grendels mothers to make it more interesting and modern. Filmmakers changed the original story when they wrote Beowulf the movie to modernize it, make it interesting to catch the watchers, and to save time and money.
For this presentation I will be analyzing Emma by Jane Austen, which was written in the 1700’s, and Clueless, which came out in 1995, and how the representation of women changed in the novel and its film adaption. Because the novel and its adaptions were made in such drastically different times, the views on women and their roles are very different.
Northanger Abbey is a typical romance novel that has the ending that all readers anticipate – the girl falls in love with the boy and they live happily ever after. However, Catherine grows as an individual and surpasses the stereotypical characteristics of a female during the time period. The novel brings to light the gender roles that were instilled during the 18th century by using male characters that strongly enforce what is believe during that time period.
The director stayed true to the book as much as possible because people that have read the book would be disappointed and gives it bad reputation and its an well known story.
The pacing of the film, first the movie felt totally rushed and was simplified so much that in result caused major plot changes. The movie was simplified in things like: the colors of the armies in battle school instead of three colors is just one also, the location of battle school to just outside of
II. Credibility Statement: A growing interest in the development of the Tudor family led me to research some information on my own, and when I came across Anne Boleyn’s story I knew that I had to share what I had uncovered.
It is a rare occurrence when an author can make a book stating real historical events and facts both readable and captivating. Although when it does occur, it gives the book a vibe that is usually evident in novels and fictions. In England’s Mistress: The Infamous Life of Emma Hamilton the author, Kate Williams, is able to fully achieve this. The purpose of this book is to make evident to the reader just how famous Emma Hamilton was around the world and how she was able to rise to such a great magnitude of fame. Williams exemplifies the fact that Emma Hamilton was able to become the most famous female of her time through
Comparison between the novel Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë, and the homologous film from 1996