The Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum

Phylogeography is a field of study that implements biogeography and genetics to understand the geographic distribution of a species. It is concerned with historical principles and processes that influence evolution and speciation. The tiger is an evolutionary wonder; it is a prime example of the responsiveness that some species have to changing climatic conditions. The tiger once had the largest geographic distribution of all cat species; subspecies adaptations allowed them to live in a large range of habitats throughout the Asian continent making it a perfect candidate for the study of phylogeography. This review will examine the evolutionary history of the tiger and will explain how the species was affected by climatic fluctuations and biogeographic processes during the Plestocene epoch.

Introduction This first lecture is designed to introduce the primate order in terms of its classification and to familiarise you with the animals so that the rest of the course makes some sort of sense. I will cover a working definition of what makes a primate, give you a general classification scheme, describe the major features that identify the groups within the classification and discuss some of the controversial areas of the classification. I shall treat the taxonomy as a synonym for classification which seems to be its commonest current usage, although you should be aware that some people consider taxonomy to be more about the principles behind the classification than the classification itself.

There is a circumstance that has beset the understanding of evolution over time that there is no general theory involving primate evolution. Most of the theories are just mere speculation. Over the years, primates like gorillas, chimpanzees, and baboons all happened to have their turn in evolution. It was previously presumed that the taxon of interest happened to have the exact similar physiology and ecology as the analog taxon (Rafferty, 2010).The majority of the first primate species theories have been utilized because they solely share one fundamental characteristic with the hominines with the chimpanzees as the phylogenetic cousins. This paper addresses the different ecological conditions that handled the evolution of primates. It

Primates first evolved from the trees of tropical forests, later to the ground. Through the times of prosimians to human, many characteristics has been represented due to the adaptations to new environments and resulted in evolutionary changes. The Earth has encountered several geological and climatic changes over time. For the primates existed at that time had to adjust itself especially in body configurations and locomotion in order to better survive. It is important to be aware of this information since we are the part of occurring changes as well. Throughout the evolution owing to the transforming environments interacting with natural selection, primates developed their own ways to move better (meaning changes in locomotion) with different types of bodies (meaning changes in body configuration).

From the trees to the grasses to the microbes to the animals, all life on earth is interconnected. Just as the trees are connected to the microbes in the dirt, the climate is connected to every living thing on this planet. The success of animals has always depended on the success of plants, known as the producers in the food supply chain. The changing climate has had a powerful effect upon evolution, including the evolution of primates. This essay explores the proliferation and the demise of primate species from the Paleocene Epoch to the Miocene Epoch by comparing and contrasting the physical and behavior differences between the primates of each period and how the ecological conditions of the period allowed for their selection.

Afropithecus is a fairly large extinct ape- 50kg, characterized by a lack of a prehensile tail, long snout with procumbent incisors, generalized limb proportions and thick molar enamel. The braincase of Afropithecus is fairly small in size compared to other Miocene apes and Old World Monkeys from the same area. The primitive characteristics of Afropithecus suggest a relation to early catarrhines- such as Aegyptopithecus. And the post-cranial fossil record suggest that it was both arboreal and quadrupedal, similar to the proconsul that Afropithecus is categorized

When sometimes around twelve thousand years ago climate started to become warmer and ice started to melt, it created a great allowance for ancient hunters to reach North America. Native Americans started to hunt in the wider areas and supply their community with a lot of meat. When people started to have more food, especially meat that caused a fast growth of population. For some unknown reasons, at the same time big mammals and mastodons started to disappear from the Earth. It is a possibility that the climate warming and lack of water sources played a role of the disappearance these big animals. Lack of water put animals in the situation when survival is not possible. The climate change also made a big adjustment in human’s ration and style of life. When people started to spread to North America, they discovered a lot of new food sources like small animals, fish, different kind of nuts and berries.

Historically, the set of common characteristics among primates have been documented as a consequence of adapting to arboreal living (living in trees). Even though others placental mammals (a very diverse group of close to 4,000 species ranging everything from rodents/bats to humans) were able to adapt to various environments; such as living on land (ground-dwelling) to living in oceans (marine environments), while the primates found their adaptive niche in the trees (the place in which they survival dependent upon such as in terms of proving refugee, their source of food, its habitat, etc.). In addition, the primates were not the only ones who were able to adapt to living in the trees, other mammals were capable of adapting to this way of living, however, the majority of them continued to dependent on the land for their primary source of food. On

NOVA scienceNOW : 41 - First Primates is a video that mainly talks about Primates who are ancient ancestors of human beings. Primates came out on the Earth 55million years ago when dinosaurs extinct due to collision between an immense comet and the Earth. Plesiadapiform, which is a possibly the first ancestor of primates and human beings, firstly evolved with a mouse-size organism during 10 million years. It existed during the 10 million year with diverse evidences that can show its validity of first ancester of primates. Nails of plesiadapiforms is a critical evidence that they are early ancestors of primates. Secondary proof is a tube-like structure which is found in the middle ear. It happens to be a tube for a huge vessel that goes to the

One thing that is very obvious from looking at the maps is that the ecological niche for Neanderthals is reduced, but it is also apparent that Neanderthal niches and AMH overlap each other. The map shows an AMH expansion while the Neanderthals show a contraction. The findings state that there should be no reason for the Neanderthal niches to have been reduced as the temperature was warm and favorable at the end of the H4 event. The final map shows an AMH rapid expansion after H4 caused and a reduction in Neanderthal ecological niches across Europe. The scientists suspect that the AMH expansion and the Neanderthal contraction are related. It goes further on to say that both species had contact with each other which allowed for genetic exchanges. The new findings contradict the theory that Neanderthals went extinct due to climate changes, but rather it was the AMH expansion that led to a completion between the two species that resulted in the extinction of the

Hypothesis supporting climate change as a factor in Neanderthal extinction has taken on two forms - Neanderthals inability to adapt to harsh environments and prey extinction. Traditionally, Neanderthal extinction has been contributed to sudden climate change in which the species was unable to adapt (Houldcroft & Underdown 2015). Despite the fact that Neanderthal fossil exhibit ecomorphological characteristics that suggest they were adapted to colder ‘ice age’ environments; there is considerable evidence that supports the hypothesis that climatic changes are responsible for their sudden disappearance (Rae et al 2011; Stewart 2005). Neanderthal species were unlike any

Why haven’t primates evolved like humans? This question that some may be asking. Humans and primates walked along each other for thousands of years, but then humans began using tools while the others were still picking fruit and eating it. Why did humans and not primates evolve? This paper will answer this question.

The Miocene and Pliocene epochs were two widely important time periods, both responsible for small variations in early primates that resulted in huge changes in all future generations. The Miocene epoch lasted from about 23.03 to 5.3 million years ago, and was responsible for multiple drastic features in the world that helped adapt archaic primate members into what they are today. The global temperature during the Miocene was warmer than modern days, resulting in small differences that had huge repercussions on every ecosystem and climate on earth. However there is one part of this epoch that for all primates was life changing, and that was emergence of the grasslands. This new ecosystem would become our earliest living grounds, and the reason

Each response was affected differently by the orbital variations, and similarly by greenhouse gas levels. Orbital variations had little affect on annual planetary albedo, while the addition of altered greenhouse gases recreated the albedo pattern found during the LGM more accurately. Changes in both greenhouse gases and orbital variations least effected the annual precipitation. Because the response of precipitation was most similar between the Control Experiment and Primary Experiment 3 it is likely that precipitation is not as heavily influenced by the conditions of the Last Glacial Maximum as the other factors. Annual snow and ice cover patterns could be recreated by altering present day levels of orbital variation and greenhouse gases to

There is evidence to suggest that Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens had coexisted for approximately 35-40,000 years, (Fagan 2010) from around 60,000 years ago to 25,000 years ago when they finally went extinct (Gibbon 2001). Anthropologists are still uncertain what the cause of their extinction was. This paper will analyze three main theories of Neanderthal extinction. The first theory is the competition theory, which claims that the Homo sapiens and Neanderthals had to compete for resources, ultimately leading to their demise. The second theory I will discuss is the climate change theory, which claims that Homo sapiens lived while Neanderthals died because they were better adapted to the climate. The last theory I will discuss is