The Path Goal Theory of Leadership

As a leader or follower, we must always set our goal in order to achieve something. Every leader has their individual style of

Path-goal leadership is a theory that leaders motivate followers to achieve a certain objective (Wolinski, 2010, p.2). GreaterGood is showing the world that organization do not have to

In order to comprehend external locus of control we must learn its pair, internal locus of control. According to Myers (2013), we have an internal locus of control, controlled by our own effects in the

One form of a contingency approach to leadership is the Path Goal Theory, formed by Robert House. This theory states that it is the leader’s responsibility to define their organization’s goal, define the path to achieve that goal, and to remove obstacles which prevent the attainment of these goals, by increasing their subordinates’ motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for both personal and organizational goal attainment (Landrum & Daily, 2012).

According to the path-goal theory the leader’s role is to motivate followers to follow a path towards a goal

Locus of control is the psychological term that either your fate or somethings fate is determined. There are two locus of controls, internal and external. Internal locus of control is all the gifts you receive is determined by his own decisions. An example of internal locus of control is someone failing on a quiz because he didn’t study. External locus of control is either you fate or somethings fate is determined by luck or chance. An example of external locus of control is someone winning the lottery. These two determine how good you do at school. People who have internal locus of control do better than people who have external locus of control. This is because people who have internal locus of control believe that if they study and work

Overall, the path-goal theory, path-goal theory of leader effectiveness, or path-goal model can be considered as a variant on Transactional Leadership Theory, where the leader clearly is directing activity and the only factor that varies is the manner in which this is done. There are some aspects of Contingency Theory, as well, where various means of application vary with the situation. The leader sees a path that needs to be tread, one leading to the accomplishment of a goal and she or he attempts to clear it and get the group members to tread on it. The leader may cajole command, reward or punish, get suggestions from the group, or sugar coat the tasks, if necessary, but it is clear that democracy is not the hallmark of this method. The Path-goal of Leadership Effectiveness was created to rectify prior research and anomalies resulting from empirical investigations of the effects of leader/task orientation and leader/person orientation/relationship on worker satisfaction and performance (House 1971).

Path Goal Theory is a contingency approach to leadership which under Mary Kay’s responsibility is to increase subordinates’ motivation by clarifying the behaviours necessary for task accomplishment and rewards. Under Path Goal Theory it must be formed by tangible award. Mary Kay increases her follower motivation by either (i) clarifying the follower’s path to the rewards that are available or (ii) increasing the rewards that the follower values and desires.

Then there are the internal locus and external locus of control which concerns what is going on around them. Internal locus of control takes ownership of their own actions and look for promotions because of them. They take the company goals to heart. External locus of control blame others for their actions because they do not believe in them.

Path Goal Theory is a theory proposed by Martin Evans and Robert House, which is then developed by Robert House himself which suggests how leaders of any organization can be effective towards their subordinates in order to achieve organizational goals. This theory was first introduced in 1971 which was created based on Victor Vroom’s ‘Expectancy Theory of Motivation’. The name ‘Path-Goal’ itself shows that the leader should clarify their follower’s performance and remove any obstacle which comes between them and their goals. It is best when the leader focuses on each of the

Leadership has been studied from a wide range of perspectives and thus it means different things to different people. Some people view leadership as the focus of group processes, some others view it from a personality or skills perspective, to some others leadership is an act or behavior, some school of thought describe leadership in terms of power relationship while some view leadership as a transformational process (Northouse, 2012). Looking at the various definitions of leadership, there are various terms that are important; including the fact that leadership is a process that involves influence and the attainment of a common goal, and usually occurs in the context of a group (Northouse, 2012). The path-goal theory is one of the

Path-goal theory deals with the leader's style to motivate followers, to accomplish set goals (Northouse, 2010). The path-goal theory is simply the implication that a leader works with an individual to establish a goal. The leader does this by individual motivation to achieve the proposed goal, while working through obstacles that may hinder achieving that goal (Whitener, 2007). The basic assumption of path-goal theory is that the following motivates subordinates: the capability to perform the work, their efforts will result in a certain outcome, and the payoff will be worthwhile (Whitener, 2007). The path-goal theory is a pragmatic approach that the leader uses to motivate the followers to achieve the set goals.

Locus of control is how a person believes things are determined in their life. There are two types of locus of control internal and external. Internal locus of control is when a person believes that they determine outcomes in their lives by how hard they work, and the choices they make. External locus of control is when a person believes that whatever they do a higher being like god is in control, and their choices the outcomes in their life. I believe that I could be a better student if I work harder and have more of an internal locus of

Locus of control has to do with how much control a student perceives themselves to have concerning their success in the classroom. There are two distinct points on the locus of control spectrum: internal and external. A student who is externally focused believes that their success depends on influences outside of themselves. A student who is internally focused believes that success in the classroom is dependent upon their own actions. When failing a quiz, a student who is externally focused may believe that the test was “too hard”, or the teacher did not teach the material good enough. A student who is internally focused very often assigns the blame to themselves after experiencing a setback.

What is locus control? Locus control is how a student thinks they should be rewarded in outcomes in life. There are two different types of locus control, the first being internal locus control. Internal locus control is where the student thinks they believe their rewards are given by their decisions. The second type is external locus control. External locus control is where the student thinks that they are rewarded by luck or by chance. Locus control is very important to a success of a student, because it determines how hard a student works.