The Patient Physician Relationship : A Case For Organization And Library Research Purposes Essay

1027 Words5 Pages
Introduction. In the not too distant past, physicians were not required to obtain informed consent from their patients because the general mantra stated that physicians were experts in the field of health. People believed physicians ultimately knew what they were doing and placed an enormous amount of trust in their decisions. Overtime, the patient-physician relationship grew a little more skeptical, as the nation together became more aware and educated about their health, empowering those to make more informed decisions about their own health. Informed consent evolved through the patient-physician relationship, as exemplified in the following research. Legal Citation Elements. A legal citation has several cohesive elements that make up a particular case for organization and library research purposes. Comparable to almost every legal citation, Lugenbuhl v. Dowling contains several distinct elements. The plaintiff in this particular case is Milton C. Lugenbuhl et al., while the defendant is the second name listed, Dr. John Dowling. The case took place on October 10, 1997 in the Supreme Court of Louisiana. For referencing and researching purposes, Lugenbuhl v. Dowling is found on page 447 in volume 701 of the Southern Reporter, Second Series. The date of Nov 21, 1997 indicates that the losing party requested a new hearing but was subsequently denied. Doctrine of Informed Consent. Struder (1987) defines the doctrine of informed consent as the physician 's medical obligation
Get Access