preview

The Period Of The Punic Wars

Decent Essays

While the governments of Rome and Carthage around the times of the Punic wars might look similar as drawn in organisational chart fashion, reflecting structural similarities, there were important differences in the allocation of responsibilities, concepts of citizenship and the scope and exercise of power. I will firstly provide a brief history of governance in the two societies and then depict the structural similarities before highlighting important differences.
Brief history of governance
Rome’s early government was essentially a democratic monarchy. It comprised a king, a senate (council of elders) and a Comitia Curiata – a form of general assembly reflecting the prevailing societal structure – which elected the king and gave him his powers (Morey, 1901, Chapter III). Late in the 6th century BC, it transitioned uneasily into an aristocratic republic. While the specific forms, offices and powers of the various governmental bodies evolved, often catalyzed by social conflict between the patrician and plebeian classes, it remained a tripartite set of mechanisms comprising the Magistrates and Consuls, Senate, and Assemblies and Tribunes (EmpireRome.com, n.d.).
Monarchistic rule also prevailed in Carthage until the 4th century BC, though it may have been an elective model rather than hereditary (Mackay, 1999). A tri-partite model then prevailed. Politically, Carthage appears to have been unusually stable. Aristotle noted that Carthage had upwards of five hundred years without

Get Access