The Philosophy Of Religion : Thomas Aquinas And Fredrich Nietzsche

- St. Thomas Aquina interpreted Aristotelian philosophy from a Christian perspective. Aquina also gave five proofs for God’s existence; motion, efficient cause, possibility and necessity, degrees of perfection and design. The first way was natural things are in motion. If something is in motion, then it must be set into motion by something outside of itself. There

Saint Thomas Aquinas was a Philosopher used the logic of both Aristotle and Saint Augustine to establish his teachings. He taught that believing in God was not simply for the ignorant. He used both Greek Philosophy and Christian Doctrine in his teachings. He taught an abundant of things including that the goal of Theology is is use reason to grasp the truth about God and to experience salvation through that truth. In addition to that, he shaped the catholic understanding of mortal sin and venial sin.

that the existence of God cannot be demonstrated” (24). Many religions believe that God is the best thing ever and he is infinitely good. With this assumption, it would make sense that God would not allow evil to exist. Because there is evil in the world, according to Aquinas, God cannot be demonstrated to exist because he would not allow something this bad to exist if he is infinitely good. Even though Aquinas has these strong opinions about God not existing, he always does a good job of thinking about the other side of the argument. Aquinas says, “The existence of God and other like truths about God, which can be known by natural reason, are not articles of faith, but are preambles to the articles; for faith presupposes natural knowledge, even as grace presupposes nature, and perfection supposes something that can be perfected” (23). This opinion is very religiously driven because it is stating that the things that are believed in the religion are natural knowledge. However, some people really do believe this, so it is a valid way of thinking about it. It contradicts what Aquinas first said because here it is saying that faith and natural knowledge are the same thing, where first he said they were

Religion has been one of the strongest institutions in the world nearly since the beginning of time itself. There are and have been many types of different religions and/or belief systems throughout history. These different religions have been the source of many different conflicts over time such as wars. They have also been the source of unification and common ground. As religion has gotten bigger and bigger, it has lead to widespread changes in how it is disseminated amongst its constituents. This has naturally lead to the advent of religion becoming institutionalized and mainstream in a way.

Attention getter: Hi Everyone, I would to start this presentation with a quote by Christopher Philosophy, he said that, “Religion is part of the human make-up. It's also part of our cultural and intellectual history. Religion was our first attempt at literature, the texts, our first attempt at cosmology, making sense of where we are in the universe, our first attempt at health care, believing in faith healing, our first attempt at philosophy.”

Aquinas argued the existence of God with five main points. Aquinas began by saying that nothing can be a cause of itself; rather every event was caused by some prior event. Therefore event A causes event B that leads to event C and so forth. He believed in this cause and effect relationship but believed that there must be a first cause as a starting point. When contemplating this starting point Aquinas rejected the possibility of an infinite series of events. This means that the universe has not existed forever and there must have been something from which every single event stems. There must be an uncaused first cause, which Aquinas concluded to be God. The first cause is called the unmoved mover. The unmoved mover is what set all other events and beings in motion.

In the article, “The Five Ways,” from Summa Theologica, Thomas Aquinas argues whether God exists, which

After reading Article 1, Aquinas for Armchair Theologians by Timothy M. Renick most can automatically acquire that Thomas Aquinas was a very influential thinker amongst others when explaining his theological views. His religious views may have differed from others during his time, however, it did influence and encourage others on the different topics of God vs. Satan, and why God has not all the answers, and powers when making sure every human being should not face evil. Aquinas believed that Christians needed to view their basic beliefs in another way to make sense of their own faith when questioning all that God did for each individual. The real question to all this, which a lot of people even question today is “Why is their evil in the World?”

Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica represents one of the most famous attempts to prove God's existence. Aquinas wrote at a time in which people began to develop skepticism concerning the existence of God. In this regard, it is instructive to position Aquinas

The third argument Aquinas makes is that of possibility and necessity. This argument holds that everything in this world has possibility to be and not to be. If there is the possibility that everything at one time or another cannot be, then at one time there was nothing, because everything that could have been, wasn 't^(et if there was nothing at one time, then there was nothing that could be^and so there would still be nothing. Therefore, there had to be something that existed to cause all the possibilities

Aquinas arguments are strong cases in the existence of God. His work helped me appreciate and made me want to explore his philosophical skill in exploring Gods nature, and also defending Christian teaching. Being Christian is one of the main reasons why I picked Aquinas arguments, also because the work he provided for us is true in my eyes. I’m going to defend and state some reasons in why I believe him and his role should be played in Religion today. “Motion” an argument he tries to prove in God existence.

The main idea of Aquinas's five proofs is to prove that god exists and to convince individuals to stray away from the idea of an infinite regress. He uses a strategies of reason, faith and science in order to explain this argument that God exist. These arguments allow for natural theology. The first argument that Aquinas forms is the argument of motion. He states that we live in a world where substances are constantly moving.

To achieve this Supreme Being, one must have a faith in him. He can do this by knowing the five routes in which Aquinas demonstrates that there is a God. He trusted that these five ways would surely discover this higher being. The principal way is known as the contention from movement. He expressed, as did Aristotle, that a protest that is in movement is put into movement by another question or compel. Thus, he trusted that the whole development more likely than not been started by some compel. This constrain was God, the "Unaffected Mover". The second route in which he demonstrated that there must be a God is known as the Causation of Existence. He expressed, as all know, that no protest can made itself. In this manner, there probably been something, God, who was the first to make things. The third way is known as the Contingent and Necessary Objects. He saw that there are two sorts of articles that exist in the universe. They are unexpected creatures and fundamental creatures. An unforeseen being can not exist without a vital being bringing on its presence. The important being that can do this is God. The forward way is known as the Argument from Degrees and Perfection. He saw that things have differing degrees of value. One can tell the contrasts between these degrees by judging the thing against a question that has the ideal quality, God.

According to Aquinas, the existence of God can be proven in 5 ways, namely through the arguments of motion, efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and governance of the world. Motion is regarded by Aquinas as a thing observable. Man can prove that with his senses that things are in motion. It is necessary to believe that movers are put in motion by another mover. Because that is, nothing can be both potential motion and actual motion at the same time in the same respects for either case.

He believed in natural theology and thought that man could not understand God without God's assistance and guidance. The foundations of his proofs of God’s existence were based on his five basic beliefs about God. Aquinas wrote that God was: 1) simple as in having no parts, 2) perfect therefore lacking nothing, 3) infinite having no beginning and no end, 4) immutable as in never changing, and 5) one in essence and existence.