The Pico And Peo Formats

In response to the question set, I will go into detail of the study, consisting of the background, main hypotheses, as well the aims, procedure and results gathered from the study; explaining the four research methods chosen to investigate,

As a school nurse in an urban middle school setting conducting a study to test the effect of a coaching intervention for students with Type 1 Diabetes, I would first need to formulate my PICO question. In this case it would be “In middle school students with Type 1 Diabetes, what is the effectiveness of coaching intervention on student understanding?” Type 1 diabetes is a chronic condition which usually occurs during childhood or adolescence due to genetics and exposure to certain viruses (Mayoclinic.org, 2016).

It has become best practice for clinicians and others in the health care sector to make decisions on the best available scientific evidence given the increasing demands for evidence-based approaches across the health system. A Clinical question that forms the basis of research, gives directions to the researcher, and details the answers and outcomes gleaned from the clinically relevant question. The process or format that helps to explore formalizing a research question is called PICOT. The PICOT mnemonic is defined as:

Next, in the Rogerian Argument body paragraph, the author wants to equal time discussing both positions on the issue, but try not to persuade the reader. The Helmet paper spent a lot of time debating the adverse side effect and different incidents that happen to people not wearing the hamlets. By talking about the unwanted side effect an example of an event in the sport, this gave the reader to think not wearing a helmet is wrong. The conclusion paragraph fails to make a compromise between the two issue in the paper. The last part discusses why people should start to wear a helmet because it can save life's and companies are beginning to make them more comfortable and not so cumbersome to the rider. This paper did a poor job with the Rogerian structure. The article discusses the other position briefly in the

A PICOT question is formulated in order to assist the researcher in obtaining answers to a specific question, decreases the uncertainty surrounding the issue, and provides a systematic approach to achieve an answer (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overhold, 2013). The authors find that each component of the PICOT question drives the next step of the evidence based practice process. First, a specific population must be determined by controlling the group to a certain age range or special sub-group. By compiling a specific group the clinician is more likely to formulate better evidence to support the issue. Next, an intervention is introduced and can be a therapy, test, disease process, etc. The authors conclude that, “the more specifically the intervention or issue of interest is defined, the more focused the search will be” (p.29). Then, a comparison group is added, but only necessary if completing a quantitative study. Lastly, an outcome is determined of which the study will reveal by a given time period.

A comprehensive database research was conducted through online library to research for evidence in relation to the PICOT question. According to a level VII study, beta

When Rebecca asks why the PICOT question is so important, Carlos explains that it's a consistent, systematic way to identify the components of a clinical issue. Using the PICOT format to structure the clinical question helps to clarify these components, which will guide the search for the evidence.6, 7 A well-built PICOT question increases the likelihood that the best evidence to inform practice will be found quickly and efficiently.5-8

The analysis of the data was done by employing the following statistical techniques which were chosen only after the investigator found them to be most appropriate and compatible to the data. Each statistical method is based upon its own specific assumptions regarding the nature of the sample, its universe and research conditions. These factors were considered in advance. Following statistical measures were

In addition, a simple descriptive statistics were analyzed, altogether the data were recorded, copied and analyzed using the Colaizzi’s method to qualitative examine. There were three important factors that the data gathered information from; one factor was the patient, the second factor was the caregiver, and the third and final factor was the medical

PICOT is a special acronym for the elements of evidence-based clinical questions as follows; patient population (P), intervention /issue of interest (I), comparison intervention / issue of interest (C), outcomes of interest (O), as well as time it takes for the intervention to achieve the desired outcomes (T).The use of PICOT format in structuring of clinical questions assists in the clarification of the important components as well as providing help in the search for the necessary evidence (McKibbon & Marks,2001).A PICOT question which is well-built increases the very livelihood that the chosen best evidence can adequately inform practice in a quicker and efficient manner.

This section will provide the rationale of the methods employed and highlight how the study will be performed. The study will examine the population with the sample size identified, data collection method and its analysis will be offered.

Correlational analysis were used to explore the relationships between the studies key variables, the results are indicated below (Table 2).

The research design of this study is a descriptive prevalence study. The purpose of descriptive studies is to observe, describe, and document aspects of a situation as it naturally occurs. In

This study will use quantitative methods of research. The major advantage of using quantitative research design is that it is an exceptional method for making conclusions and agreeing or disagreeing to any

The objective of this chapter is to describe the procedures used in the analysis of the data and present the main findings. It also presents the different tests performed to help choose the appropriate model for the study. The chapter concludes by providing thorough statistical interpretation of the findings.