preview

The Poem Essay: A Crossing, By Mark Slouka

Decent Essays

Essay A: Crossing- by Mark Slouka

The feeling of getting closer together, and the fact that fathers always try to be close to their sons, is not an abnormal thing. For many years’ fathers and sons have shared some experiences together – especially in nature. Whether it is going fishing together or trips to the wild. Furthermore, this is a way fathers can get the knowledge of their sons, and getting much closer to each other – because they are the only two on the trip into the wild. In this short story named Crossing from 2009 written by Mark Slouka, a father takes his son on a trip into the wilderness, to experience the nature together. But nature is not always kind, and therefore it can be challenging, and shall definitely not be underestimated. …show more content…

The comments from the narrator help the reader understanding that something is about to happen. This voltage built-up is expressed by means of the setting and mood. The mood is from the beginning of ominous, which can be indicated by the weather: “It was raining…” (page 1, line 1), “a scene of a black road, still wet, running toward mountains larded with snow like fatty meat” (page 1, line 3-4). In that way, the suspense is built up from the start, with the aid of the depressing weather and setting. The most important factor for the setting is the river because almost the whole story takes its place in or by the river. The river is described as violent and stronger than usual:” The river was bigger than he remembered it, stronger.” (page 1-2, line 34-35). Which means that crossing the river now, is definitely, even more, harder, than when he did with his father. The river gives the suspense to the story because it gives the reader the feeling of something is going to happen. Due, to the violent river, there can be drawn a contrast between the river and the son – because the river is violent, and the son is fragile. “The river. It wanted to be whole, unbroken. It wanted him gone” (page 3, line 143) this sentence makes the river “comes to live”, which means the river is personified – this makes the river frightening, and the reader seriously gets the feeling of there is about to …show more content…

The reader is left with the question: Will they pass the river, or be trapped in it? The reader may conclude what is going to happen, through an interpretation of the story. The father and the son are left in the river between safety and danger. The father drags the son in a dangerous situation, which is the line between life and death. In this sentence: “He wanted to scream for help. There was no one – just the rushing plain of the river, the trees. He couldn’t move.” (page 4, line 145-146) it can indicate that they might not make it and that the father already realized that. The father, therefore, tries to calm his son, and then he thinks about how the priest kissed the victims before they died, and then it can be interpreted that he wanted to make his son feel safe before the river takes them away.
The title of the story is “Crossing”, which is written in extended time –what make seem like an unfinished conclusion. That the ending is not closed, and that they are standing between life and death, and that what’s happen next is up to the reader to find out. The title indicates that the father and son are crossing something, and in this story it is a river, which can be interpreted as a portal from life to death, that they are standing in

Get Access