The Political Analysis Of Bernie Sanders's Case Of Trump

The article entitled “The Tide That Sinks All Boats” by Chris Matthews discusses how feelings of protectionism and nationalism are making it difficult for President Obama to pass the Trans-pacific partnership (TPP) through Congress. The implication in this article is that the campaigns of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump during this presidential election stirred these feelings amongst Americans. Thus, members of Congress fear that passing the free trade agreement will make them a “traitor to the American Worker”. The article also mentions how free trade agreements often take the brunt of people’s fears regarding global trade and its impact on domestic job security referencing NAFTA (Matthews, 2016).

Donald trump is a very successful businessman and Republican nominee for President; he has attracted many people towards himself, some happy with him and some with hatred for him. The author explained how Trump was under heavy criticism when he wrote “Trump came under heavy criticism when he attacked Khizr Khan, the father of U.S. Army captain Humayun Khan, who was killed in Iraq.” Not only did Trump attack Khizr he also insulted their religion, which caused anger throughout the country. Khan, who is a captain in the U.S. Army responded by criticising him about banning Muslims from entering the U.S. and gave out an emotional speech against Trump. Donald Trump criticising Khan was not the only time he dishonored American heroes, but he also

When most people think of Donald Trump, and Bernie Sanders, there are few, if any similarities, that generally initially come to mind. Mr. Trump is a recognized figure throughout the world, where far fewer people were even aware of Mr. Sanders, until quite recently. However, in this early stage of our political season, both men have put together and enjoyed far more support, than most of us probably believed would be the case, just a very short time ago. Personality-wise, the two individuals are miles apart; Mr. Trump being far more brash, edgy, confrontational and showy, while Mr. Sanders appears far more reserved, content and issues-oriented, etc. One man seems to eagerly belittle and attack his opponents, while the other avoids personal

Clinton questions, she sees it as an opportunity for the growth of our country. Moreover, besides supporting DACA and DAPA which are necessary for certain people’s eligibility for citizenship, Clinton is keen to establish a Comprehensive Immigration Reform legislation with a full and equal path to citizenship to make sure that people in a variety of situations are eligible for citizenship.

I will begin by discussing Trump’s argument. I will then analyze each premise and the final conclusion of his argument. Several premises and the conclusion of his argument contain a fallacy. Additionally, a premises in Trump’s argument is a false premise. Because of these holes in his argument I will conclude that Trump’s conclusion about Senator Warren is unjustified. Finally, I will consider a possible objection to my argument, but I will show why this objection doesn’t work.

On Wall Street: "I led the effort against Wall Street deregulation. See where Hillary Clinton was on this issue." On gun control -- the issue over which

Bernie Sanders, a Democratic candidate in the Presidential election, announced his campaign in his hometown of Burlington, Vermont. It was a very unusual setting: though it was a rally, it was seen more as a festival, with free Ben & Jerry’s ice cream and performances by the local Vermont-based band, Mango Jam. In his 35-minute speech given at the rally, Sander’s focused on campaigning without the help of billionaires and Super PACs, going against what most of his opponents were doing. He launched his campaign with the hope of creating a “political revolution to transform [this] country economically, politically, socially and environmentally” (Sanders). In explaining his ideals on how he would bring about this political revolution, Bernie Sanders

This political cartoon about Trump uses many rhetorical devices to relay a message to anyone who would so care to look at this particular ad about him having allegedly stolen Putin’s shirt.  I believe that the author of this political cartoon was trying to persuade to believe Trump is a bad candidate for the presidency by showing us he has ties with the Russian dictator Vladimir Putin.  Do to this persuasion; the effectiveness of this passage is greatly achieved using logos and pathos because it explains how terrible it is to let the leader of the free world have a great relationship with the country that cannot stand us, Russia.

Recent remarks by Donald Trump are pretty dark. It was easy to shrug off when the celebrity first caught a lead in the primary polls. Media contributors casually called it an early election-cycle phenomena, with references to the Godfather of pizza Herman Cain and his brief rise and hard fall. All the usual caveats about primary battles occurring such a long way from Iowa have been made. Republican strategists brush it aside. “Trump is an entertainer, that gave him high name recognition and an instant following. Eventually, party loyalists will, respectfully, choose a more substantive candidate.”

As he continued with his explanation he began to use the straw man fallacies. Somehow the conversation shifted from generating jobs to China devaluing currency. He “claims” that China is using us to rebuild their country and continues to say that we have no politicians to fight their actions. It is completely off topic but yet he also does this again where he brings up child care out of nowhere and persists to give irrelevant statements that lingers the initial question. Donald Trump uses a particular rhetoric appeal to persuade his audience which I believe to be pathos. For example: during certain segments of his claims the inflation in his voice rises when he attempts to counter a claim. Pathos refers to using emotiono to get your point across and that is all Donald Trump would exhibit. Trump would interrupt and/or overspeak Hillary

[Abstract]In the 2016 American presidential election, Donald Trump, who has been dampening down since his announcement of running for president, beat his opponent Hilary Clinton, being elected as the next president of the United State, which was seen as a political miracle. As we know, rhetoric plays a vital role in western society, and it is even more closely interconnected with the western political life. The rhetoric resources were divided into three parts in the western classical rhetoric. They are logos, pathos and ethos. And Aristotle has long put forward that ethos is the controlling factor of persuasion. From a perspective of ethos of western rhetoric, this paper is to illustrate the core theory of ethos and to focus on the Donald Trump’s first public speech running for presidency, and then to make an in-depth analysis on how Trump constructed his identity and character through the use of ethos strategies in his speech and thus earned great popularity and more voters’ support. This paper is intended to point out the decisive role of ethos in persuasion.

“Make America Great Again!” This is the campaign slogan for the republican candidate Donald Trump, who is running for present in the 2016 presidential election. His slogan is simple yet complex, it’s easy to dream about but hard to do. The United States of America is starting to become an extremely corrupt place. We now live in a time where police officers are viewed as our enemies instead of our friends, where if you give someone in your local supermarket a friendly “hello” they look at you as if you are mentally unstable. How is this problem ever going to be solved? The answer is we need a new leader, His name is Donald J Trump.

It may be ridiculous to say that in a two-candidate debate, both candidates are winners; however, the two candidates' goals were totally different. Sanders needed to demonstrate that he could fully meld his racial justice message into his economic ideas and become the candidate of the progressive movement as a whole. Doing this was important not just to his 2016 candidacy, but to his future as an idol for progressivism. Clinton, meanwhile, is the increasingly popular favorite for the nomination. The delegates and superdelegates simply favor her tremendously. So the most important thing she could do in tonight's debate against Bernie Sanders was avoid saying anything so tremendously, horrendously stupid that she would sabotage her success. Instead,

She supports this argument by using examples like saying “George W. Bush spoke to a joint session of Congress after the terrorist attacks

At least four people at a Bernie Sanders rally in Oakland rushed the stage Monday evening, spurring Secret Service agents to jump onto the raised platform and protect him.