The Politics Of Performance Appraisal Case Study

According to research, majority of personnel hates the performance evaluation process from beginning to end. It is known that managers really hate the day to day procedures when it comes to finalizing a performance evaluation. In order to be an effective manager, they will need to have the distinguish traits. This paper will explain if there is a profile need for a manager that struggles during the performance evaluation process. Now on the other hand, it is important for managers to understand the key elements of the performance evaluation process. The main reason that many managers hate the performance evaluation process initially is that it’s aggravating.

Development of a performance appraisal system that is effective in a human service organization is of benefit for the organization and the employees. For a performance appraisal system to be effective, the system has to be strategic, designed to fit the specific needs of the organization, non-discriminatory, non-bias, with correct implementation and administration. Many different components, must to be incorporated to make this type of system beneficial for all who use it, and all who are evaluated by the system.

The job description for each position is different and so should the evaluation process and questioner. Each department in an organization needs to have guidelines set forth outlining the duites, expectations, training model, and professional code and consistency among employees are critical to the professional appraisal evaluation process. Each employee must be held to the same accountability or the evaluation process becomes tainted by lack of consistency. Management should always focus on the appraisal process as another of their job duties instead of over thinking the task and rating an employee out of fear and retaliation or to prevent an employee from receiving a raise or promotion. In addition, the for the appraisal process to be beneficial to the company the outcome has to be to protect the company from liability or litigation from a disgruntled employee and to boost the companies overall productivity ratings. When an employee believes he or she has a hand in creating the plan to evaluate and change his or her performance the changes are more likely to last rather than being told what changes need to

Within my setting a process we use to monitor, evaluate the performance of individuals and teams is appraisals. “All contracted staff should receive some sort of appraisal with their line manager” Daly M el al (2004 p.2070). Appraisals are good process for both managers and the staff team to openly discuss performances and quality of production and output at work. “Appraisals are regular meetings between employers and subordinate, providing a non-threatening routine occasion when work standards cam be discussed and suggestions for improvement can be jointly decided”. Sadek and Sadek (2004 p.134). To carry out a successful appraisal there is a few stages to make sure that all the correct

“Performance appraisal is the process through which employee performance is assessed, feedback is provided to the employee, and corrective action plans are designed.” (Youssef, 2012). Performance appraisals can be very effective, by doing them carefully it will improve employee performance. Consistency with the evaluations is an important part of the process. During the evaluation express positive and negative accomplishments from the employee by using examples. Use goals, job related data that support ratings and focus on outcomes the employee can control and work towards. List specific areas the employee can improve on. Also it is important to compliment and show your appreciation to the employee.

Effective performance appraisals for developing and sustaining a high- performance appraisal system are based upon two key tenets. The first tenet suggests that if appraisal processes operate as a system. The second tenet is that individual manager’s play a pivotal role in achieving effective appraisals and that they need the right tools and support to be effective.

Communication: Effective communication is very important because it effects relations and objectives of the organization. Following are the points which tells the relationship between employers and employees

Max Steadman, Jim Coburn, Lynne Sims, and Tom Hamilton are managers at Eckel Industries, a manufacturer of arc-welding equipment in Minneapolis. They work in the manufacturing division each supervising a different department within the division. Every Friday the managers meet after work for drinks to relax, gossip, and give and receive advice about problems on the job. This week they discuss performance appraisals which they recently conducted. Each of the managers completed evaluation forms using graphic rating scales on each employee then discussed the appraisal with that employee.

The contents of this paper will reveal the performance evaluation process and how can it become successful during the employee evaluation process. As well as is the process difficult from the manager or the employee perspective’s by also the revealing various traits of an effective manager in the workplace.

Carry out the appraisal: assess and monitor all of the employee’s performances, talk about those evaluation with both leaders and employees agreeing on the futures objectives.

The annual performance review seems ineffective, a waste of time, or it becomes demotivating for employees and thus counterproductive. Employee appraisal is a method of measuring and evaluating employee job performance. The employee evaluation consists of regular reviews at different intervals every six months or yearly reviews. The evaluations are a pre-determined set of criteria centered on organizational goals. A manager conducts performance evaluations and discusses the employee’s strengths, weaknesses, employee behaviors, productivity. A performance appraisal is essential for refinement, maintaining, or increasing job performance. These reports give the employee insight to where improvement is needed, and it provides an opportunity for development.

Performance appraisals are an essential element of the general performance management procedure. A performance management structure involves having an appraisal technique or method, substantiated by job types, colloquial and continuous feedback, leadership training, performance expectations, punitive policies, as well as employee productivity and acknowledgement. In addition, both positive and negative feedback are elements that are instrumental in the arena of performance management. However, the paramount cause of performance appraisal efficiency as well as effectiveness is how well each of these elements correlates with one another.

Performance appraisal is the performance of staff duties and responsibilities assigned for reviewing and discussion. In this assessment is based on his / her income about the employees where work in, rather than the result of employee personality characteristics. Assessment of skills and achievements measured with reasonable accuracy and consistency. It provides a way to help identify areas of performance improvement, and help promote professional growth. It should not, however, be considered the only means of communication competence. Communication will help open lines to effective working relationships.

Management's assessment of staff: managers evaluate employees are not traditionally known in the workplace, but this idea has spread is between the organization recently. This strategy gives workers the right to evaluate the managers where they can feel that there is equality in the organization. As a result, it may increase the performance of employees.

recruiting available to them to avoid some of the poor hiring decisions and they are: “current employees, referrals from current employees, former employees, formal military, customers, print and radio advertisements and internet advertising, career sites, and social media, employment agencies, and temporary workers” (p. 174). However, the hiring process does have costs attached to it, recruitment cost – acquiring applicant campus visits; selection cost – interviewing applicants; training cost – investing in applicant; and separation cost – layoffs, which also has to be taken into consideration during the hiring process because it has a major