Ed O’Keefe on the Washington post wrote “ The Postal Service experienced a 13 percent drop in mail”. Cullen, Kevin of commercial news points out how the postal service (USPS) is losing money. Also McDevitt, Caitlin of Newsweek mentions it’s a waste of due to junk mail. Throughout the years of the USPS not being restructured to save money for other needs.
Furthermore, source E McDevitt Caitlyn supports that USPS should not be restructured. According in the article it states “The postal service lost $1.1 billion in its latest Quarter”. This shows the amount of customers using the USPS.
Another reason why, USPS should not be restructured because they are in debt. As stated in source F “ It delivered 17 percent of fewer piece in 2009 than it did
In July 2009, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) listed the budget of the United States Postal Service as “high risk” and recommended oversight from Congress and the Executive Branch. Specifically, the GAO stated that “Amid challenging economic conditions and a changing business environment, USPS is facing a deteriorating financial situation in which it does not expect to cover its expenses and financial obligations in fiscal years 2009 and 2010” (“Restructuring”, 2009, pg. 1). The GAO claimed that the mail volume in 2009 would likely decrease by about 28 billion as compared to 2008 and that the USPS would likely see declining volumes for the next five years (“Restructuring”, 2009, pg. 1). Clearly, the USPS is currently facing a
The Postal Service cannot continue to provide affordable, universal service to all areas of the country while maintaining mandated inflation-based prices without an increased ability to generate revenue and control costs. Therefore, bold changes to the business model are needed. All options – even those that have been dismissed in the past – need to be considered as part of the national discussion. In order to choose the best business model for the Postal Service, it is important first to establish the future role of the Postal Service and the mission the nation needs it to fill.
There is still a need for the United States Postal Service (USPS) today then just as anytime during the history of the United States. The USPS provides valuable and equitable services to all Americans everywhere in the United States, regardless of distance from their nearest post office. “Universal Service” a key term provided in an article by the Bloomberg Business week journal, describes what the USPS provides. The cost of delivering mail in rural communities is much higher than in urban areas. The USPS chief executive officer stated “You cannot charge 46 cents to deliver a letter by snowmobile in Alaska and make it work” (Bloomberg Business, 2014). Privatization of the USPS would possibly cause regional price differences that can place many Americans in rural areas at a
Due to the rising popularity of email and the easiness of scanning documents, less and less mail is being sent every year and because of competitors like FedEx and UPS the United States Postal Service (USPS) is having financial problems. All over the world there has been sweeping postal reform. New Zealand moved to three day mail delivery, Canada eliminated home delivery in cities, and the United Kingdom recently privatized their mail system. The United States Postal office has been losing money and reported a loss of $15.9 billion dollars in 2012. The USPS has been increasing stamp prices to make up for this financial loss, most recently increasing stamp prices from forty-four cents to forty-five. With congressing blocking the latest USPS
To many individuals, this is traditionally seen as a bureaucratic problem; however, personally I do not believe that the problem is purely the result of public sector negligence. Like many government services, it is more likely that the answer lies in serious reform rather than complete suspension. Interestingly, I located an article about the nonprofit - National Academy of Public Administration – that suggested a kind of public/private hybrid approach to fix the USPS’s difficulties. The concept entails “farming out” much of the behind the scenes process while a federal letter carrier would still handle front-line delivery services.
In Daniel Stone’s editorial article, “Flying Like an Eagle”, he advises the USPS some guidance to boost up their profit and their usage to the community. One of his inputs on the
The goal of The United States Postal Service is to create “a free flow of information between citizens and their government as a cornerstone of freedom, often spoke of a nation bound together by a system of postal roads and post offices.” (Longley 2013) Postal offices are forbidden to open any letters unless it is undeliverable The United States Postal Service (USPS) is responsible for providing postal services for the United States to all Americans no matter the geographical location. The United States Postal Service is an independent agency of the United States federal government that was
Another point the USPS should take into consideration when restructuring, is that it is too easy for most Americans nowadays to forget the significance of a hand written letter or card, when we can communicate within seconds through technology. Come to think of it, I remember running to the mailbox in excitement every November to collect a special, pink birthday card from my grandma with her messy cursive scrawled across the envelope. Now, my “special” birthday wishes are in a 30 second voicemail she leaves from her cell phone every year. The USPS must remind us of the significant difference it can make in communication by recapturing its emotional importance through advertising.
If you ask people his/her opinion on the USPS system, many would agree that they could improve their ways, I agree with those people. The USPS was once this propitious system, but it is now very flawed. The USPS is allowing junk mail to enter our mailboxes without our permission and then leaves us no options to get out of it. Overall, the USPS system has no idea what they are doing because they are losing revenue over simple problems, with simple solutions.
Royal Mail is the largest provider of postal services in the United Kingdom and one of the largest postal service providers in the world. This paper analyzes
USPS should consider shifting part of its mail volume to rail. By making this change it has been estimated that USPS could save at least $100 million per year. Additionally, “because of its lesser sensitivity to fuel price increases and greater control of its own infrastructure, rail transportation has major, long-term strategic advantages over highway” (Berman, 2012).
For example in the past year the U.S. Postal service has lost more
With Centuries of History to reflect on, the United States Postal Service has continuously strived to be the leader in the delivery and production of U.S. Consumer postal needs. Over time, delivery modes have significantly changed; consumer supply and demand has wavered; and new challenges and opportunities emerge as the cyber world evolves. The U. S. Postal Service will look to strategize though eCommerce and embrace technological invents to remain the pacesetter despite any encroaching competition.
Although, if this happens, then there will be lay-offs, but eventually the employees that were laid off will find new jobs. However, even if I believe that the Post Office should not be government supported through use of taxpayers’ money, my belief is not generalized to firms in similar circumstances but only applies to the Post Office. I am only applying this belief to the Post Office because it is a business that is not advancing with the help from the government. The company is still using the same methods with little improvement. For instance, the small introduction of Amazon deliveries on the weekends is not enough. There need to be more advances in the Postal Service because at this moment it just an obsolete business that the government should not allow to remain
Government corporations (the U.S. Postal Service and Amtrak) are designed to run like a business and, we hope, generate a profit.