The Power to Persuade Essay

In 1903, he helped Panama seceded from Colombia in order to facilitate the construction of the Panama Canal, which he later claimed as his greatest accomplishment as president. To prepare the United States for its big role in the world, Roosevelt sought to build up the country’s defenses. By the end of his presidency, Roosevelt had transformed the US Navy into a major force at sea. More importantly, Roosevelt led negotiations that ended the Russo-Japanese War in 1904-1905. For his efforts, Roosevelt won a Nobel Peace Prize. It also led to an agreement with Japan that traded that country’s recognition for the ongoing US presence in the Philippines. All of these foreign policy accomplishments impacted the US in a positive

One of his greatest feats of leadership was when he first became president he started a program called the New Deal were he totally reshaped the economic system in the United States eventually getting America out of the Great Depression. Franklin Roosevelt also joined forces with Britain and the Soviet Union to help stop the axis powers in World War Two. Despite the hardships of his presidency Roosevelt overcame them and became one of the most influential presidents in American history through the character traits of optimism, persistence, and leadership.

In the article, “Unilateral Action and Presidential Power: A Theory,” Terry M. Moe and William G. Howell, two political science instructors from Stanford University, investigate a source of presidential power, which is the president’s capability to act individually and make his own law, that has been unacknowledged yet essential to presidential leadership that it defines how the modern presidency is distinctively modern. The authors’ purpose in the article is to outline a theory of this feature of presidential power by arguing that the president’s powers of unilateral action, which is developed from the ambiguity of the contract, are strengths in American politics since they are not mentioned in the constitution. They also claim that presidents push the ambiguity of the contract to make their powers grow and that Congress and the courts would not be able to stop them (Moe and Howell, 1999, p. 1-3).

This book is a bold work by George C. Edwards in which he shares his views of the political system in the US and how it has evolved over time. He has touched almost every president since the 1930s and brought to light some interesting details about how presidents have followed patterns and used their own style of actions to meet their unique objectives. The book describes in detail the attitudes of presidents and reflects his views on presidency. For instance, he has expressed three premises about presidential leadership: public support is used as a social resource by president, presidents must take interest in the problems of the people in order to actually garner support rather than just delivering speeches, and the public can be mobilized successfully by permanent campaigns.

Beyond this “blunt instrument” of the executive branch’s formal constitutional powers, the presidency is largely what the president makes of it (Romance, July 27). The president’s real power is one of persuasion, or the ability to convince

The government holds a crucial status to its citizens, executive branch specifically, is overlooked to symbolize leadership. Nowadays, the president’s office is believed to exemplify the values of the American people. There are certain powers allocated to the president by the United States Constitution, however; the responsibility and vacancy of the President tend to evolve from one president to the next. Characteristics of presidents and their effect on political decisions has beneficial aspects

persuade. He has many options in a lot of areas, though one of them is

Even in matters of national security the president has secured new and immense power by way of the USA PATRIOT act, which, remains unfettered to this day. It would be appropriate to compare the process our leaders undertake to the ancient tale of Icarus. We find that often, our presidents simply fly to close to the sun in their quest for power. This is most apparent in their abilities to harness the power of the media, build a co-operative relationship with congressional law makers, or to implement domestic policy. In these areas, one president or another has enjoyed some level of power and success for a time; that success however, would not be absolute. Often, the power they wield, which they have empower to help them lead, would be threatened by a plethora of oppositional actors and stimuli in the political field, some of the oppositional forces would

In this paper we will compare the formal and informal powers if the President and we will explore how and why the Presidential powers have increased over time. The history of the Presidency is an account of aggrandizement; one envisions, today, a President with far reaching power, however, when looking at the Constitution alone we find a President with significant limits. Is the President of the United States the most powerful person in the world or merely a helpless giant?

“Big Brother is watching you” (Orwell 2). This quote is from the novel 1984 by George Orwell. In this book, the society is controlled by an all powerful government that capsizes the people’s brain so that there is no independent thought. Citizens are constantly being watched and monitored while all they can do is support them and pour out hate to the enemy thinking the party is always right. Hope comes to a man named Winston, the protagonist, a lone man who secretly opposes the manipulation of the mind. After the plot unravels, Winston begins to show his opposition against the party. The party controls everything in the society and puts everything the way they want it to be, endlessly reminding people that they

He was usually very confident about himself which let him speak to everyone without fear. His confidence would also result in him ignoring some people’s opinions and ideas. While this may have resulted in a few blunders of his presidency, it also resulted in him making major decisions that would make him well known and impact history. He would ignore even his closest advisor on issues such as entering the United States in World War II. During the war, even though Congress was against it, he would use his power as president to send supplies to Britain. According to the book FDR, “... was determined to send all possible aid to Britain. ‘We must become the great arsenal of democracy’ he said.” He was very confident that his decision would be for the better even though others were against it. He would also later join the U.S. in the war which would put the odds against the Axis powers. His new Deal programs were also opposed by many, however, FDR would ignore them and continue with the programs slowly helping the country recover from the Great

The modern presidency has in a sense become a double-edged sword in that presidents have become beneficiaries of anything positive that can be attributed to government, but also can be blamed for anything bad occurring in society. Quite simply, the modern president has become the center of our political system (The Modern Presidency, 2004). The men who have dealt with this double-edged sword known as the modern presidency have often walked a very fine line between effectiveness and ineffectiveness, but all have attempted to use their power in one way or another.

“Weight Loss: Health Risk Associated With Obesity.” WebMD. WebMD. 04 Jan. 2011. Web. 13 Dec. 2011.

The presidency occupies a unique position in all systems of government including the American system of government. The formal powers and the constitutional position occupied by the institution of the presidency are at the core of all national and international politics (Alexandrova & Timmermans, 2013). The President can serve as Commander-in-chief, nominate and appoint ambassadors, just to name a few of the powers of office. However, there is another power that is often overlooked by most, the power of agenda setting. The Constitution does not directly state this power, but it is heavily implied. This paper scrutinizes the institution of the presidency in line with agenda-setting literature. The agenda setting process relates to a series of streams, circumstances, or activities within public policy institutions and processes. The agenda setting process has three streams that incorporate the problem stream, the policy stream, and the politics stream. The problem stream relates to potential policy problems that may have different magnitudes attached to them. The policy stream associates with an agglomeration of potential solutions to policy problems (Eshbaugh-Soha, 2010). Additionally, the politics stream links to those policy issues and solutions that

While investigating ideology in linguistic patterns, attention needs to be paid, not only to specific linguistic choices made by representative individuals, but also to how these patterns constitute a configuration of meaning (Hasan, 1985). Halliday (2004: 106) explicates that, through uttering various propositions, the speaker ‘adopts for himself a particular speech role, and in so doing assigns to the listener a complementary role which he wishes him to adopt in his turn’. By making statements about New Caledonia’s future, formulating rhetorical questions or issuing orders to citizens, for example, the speaker or writer engages in a dynamic process of meaning negotiation.