Scholars have often debated whether guns influence an individual to commit a violence act. It is hypothesized that an individual in the presence of a firearm, has an increased likelihood of exhibiting anti-social behaviors. The studies presented, will investigate whether the presence of a gun, is a stimulus for aggressive behaviors (Berkowitz & Lepage, 1967; Anderson, Benjamin & Bartholow, 1998; Bartholow, Anderson, Carnagey & Benjamin, 2005). Studies regarding whether gun ownership influences the likelihood of abnormal behaviors in adolescence will be examined (Cunningham, Henggler, Limber, Melton & Nation, 2000; Sprinkles, 2007). Gun ownership rates and various violent acts will also be investigated, such as homicide rates and suicide rates (Hemenway & Miller, 2000; Killias, Van Kesteren & Rindlisbacher, 2001; Gius, 2009; Siegel, Ross & King, 2013). Extrinsic factors including race/ethnicity, culture, and the environment will additionally be addressed (Cunningham et al., 2000; Sprinkles, 2007; Rajan, Namdar & Ruggles, 2015). After all research has been analyzed, it will be apparent that the presence of a firearm is correlated to aggressive behaviors. Before delving into gun ownership rates, it is important to discuss the history of experiments regarding gun presence and aggression. An early experiment conducted by Berkowitz & Lepage (1967), investigated whether the presence of a weapon elicited hostile behaviors. The study observed 100 male students, who were attending
I have had guns in my life since I was young. I served eight years in the military, and have shot in competitions for many years. I also love the outdoors, and enjoy the ability to put food on the table that is natural. I think the reasons for keeping the right to bear arms are so important that if the American people lost that right; it would mean life changes that many would be unwilling to make.
More than 30,000 people are killed by firearms each year in the US. Most of which are caused by handguns. Homicide is the second leading cause of death among 15-24 year-olds. Most reasons for gun violence are caused by video game influence, and issues of mental illnesses. Video games are one of the biggest causes of gun violence because of the majority of in game violence that occurs. Today’s children are more prone to violence due to video games and the violent movies, but then that leads back to the way they were raised. In today’s world, both parents work, there is no family time to teach their children the main differences between right and wrong. When most people don’t know who they are harming, it makes it a lot easier for them to cause harm.
President obama said at a press conference on October 01, 2015 “The solution to such violence is obvious. It cannot be this easy for somebody who wants to inflict harm on other people to get his or her hands on a gun.” (Simple Minded Gun Control). Gun control is a controversial issue worldwide. The reason why this has attracted so much attention is because not everyone is in favor of gun control and each side brings up excellent points about the issue. Research related to this issue strongly supports the claim that there SHOULD be more gun control laws. Three arguments that prove this position are (1) Incidents like Sandy Hook will be less likely to occur (2) It reduces the high rates of accidental deaths (3) As the years pass by and technology updates the laws should be up to date as well. Members from the National Rifles Association state that No law-abiding American should be forced to face evil with empty hands. I say I agree with President Obama there SHOULD be more gun control laws because it should not be as easy as it is for someone who wants to inflict harm on others to get their hands on a weapon.
News is all around us and is readily available to everyone. There are many flaws in the system that hurts the authenticity of the news when you see it. The media is indirectly part of the political system. Most news is either considered liberal or conservative by many.
School shootings, gang violence, drive by shootings, murder, and thousands of acts of violence are committed every day. Members of our society criticize their own people for this violence while they continue to sit back and do nothing about it. These acts of violence have many contributing factors. Violence in our country today is escalating because we don't control the distribution of the guns sold. There are not enough restrictions on guns sold legally. The illegal purchase of guns through the black market is out of control. There is not enough education on the usage and storage of guns.
Everyday 93 Americans are killed by guns. Whether it is due to homicide or suicide, it does not matter. At the end of the day gun violence is increasing exponentially. In numerous states, gun laws have been placed in the hopes of reducing gun violence. But now many people believe that gun violence should be treated as a public health problem. I for one feel that gun violence should be put in the category of public health. Every year more than 30,000 people are victims to gun related incidents. It has become such an issue that gun violence is causing more deaths than some life threatening diseases.
The United States has the most astounding rate of weapon related crimes per capita among developed countries,:29 however it additionally has the greatest extent of firearm possession and the greatest rate of officers. Numerous examination have discovered a positive relationship between firearm possession and weapon related murders and suicide rates. Second amendment "the privilege to carry weapons" is one of the primary source of firearm brutality in the United States of America. In spite of the fact that this revision was made to secure individuals and their family unit and for self preservation yet savagery is ascending through specific people's dysfunctional behavior or their disdain towards different groups or minorities.
There is a well known saying that ‘guns don’t kill people, people do.’ The question is how does society keep guns out of the hand of those who will misuse them? Mark Kelly claims that he is pro-gun but anti-violence. To some this may seem like a contraindication, how can a person be in favor of the object that is used to create violence? People use guns in different areas of the country for different reasons. Some people own guns for protection, hunting, collecting, or for sport. Although even if a person owns a gun it does not mean there is an increase in violence. In an article written by Mark Perry in 2015, he describes the relationship between gun ownership and violence to be inversely related. So as the number of guns being purchased and kept within the home increase, the incidences of gun related deaths decreased. Perry also states that “even if you’re not convinced that increased gun ownership reduces violent crime and gun homicides… Gun violence has been decreasing significantly over time (2015 para 8).”
Gun-related violence on college campuses has increased in the past fifty years. Thousands of people die each year from gun violence in the United States. Gun violence has affected many families because of the deaths that it has caused. Gun violence has infiltrated communities and has not only caused harm to individuals but also to society as a whole. Students should not carry firearms onto college grounds, because it can lead to an escalation in violent crimes.
It is the year of 2017 almost 2018 and we have come a long way. Our nation is growing as one and sticking together the fight the hatred in the United States. Our American History was not so great. Several wars, violence, and attacks. Now today, while united as one, we have hope for the future of this nation.
For decades, the United States has been split by a dichotomy over civilian gun control. “Gun control is the term used to describe how firearms may be legally produced, sold, and used,” (Gale). As stated in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, “‘A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed,” (Gottesman/Brown). However, “research seems to indicate that owning a gun or even just seeing one [can] change how people behave,” (Striepe). Studies have shown that weapons negatively affect the individual’s psychological processes. Actions of aggression or agitation have been shown to increase during experimental situations in which guns are in view of the subject. The purpose of this project was to determine the extent of how ownership of guns and other weapons could create conflict, and to propose a solution to minimize these consequences. By studying how weapons can affect humans intrinsically and psychologically by slowly changing behaviors and beliefs over time, insight can be gained on the true dangers of gun ownership. This scientific approach also provided a look at the deeper consequences of civilian weapon control, allowing for further refinement in the creation of a solution to reverse the effects of gun control in the future.
The huge increases in juvenile homicides and suicides between 1987 and 1993 were due largely to easier access by juveniles to firearms (Redding & Shalf 2001). As a general conclusion, the risk of crime, delinquency, and violent behavior is greater in inner-cities as opposed to suburban and rural areas. An evaluation of school violence and gun possession in these areas is important to understand in order to draw significant solutions. According to Redding and Shalf (2001), inner-city youth most often carry guns to school because they are scared. Surveying students in ten inner-city high schools in four states, they found that 15% of the high school students surveyed owned a gun; 70% of them reported doing so for protection. Twenty-eight percent of students surveyed bought a handgun because they felt their “enemies” had guns; only 13% of the students bought a gun “to get someone”; and twenty percent reported having been threatened with a gun. These statistics draw upon the conclusion that students bring a gun for their own protection; however, this does not assume that the students will not use the gun in a violent manner. Twenty-eight percent of the students agreed that it is “okay to shoot someone who
The second model puts in variables related to gun behaviors and delinquency. Some variables used were group of peer and family risk variables-gang membership, gun carrying by men in the family, and gun carrying by friends. The third model used variables related to victimization. Those variables were threatened with a weapon, assaulted with a weapon, and fear of violence. The fourth model adds gun carrying for protection to crudely identify a possible self-protection motive for, not as a predictor of, gun ownership (Johnson).
Guns and crime. These two words sound interesting, right? Now think about it deeply, do they really link to each other? Do guns surely lead to crime and violent issues? If so, should governments set restrictive rules for people who own and use the guns, such as provide the mental health reports, and test the shooting skills before purchasing the guns? These questions have been mentioned and discussed over and over again in today’s world. We can often hear the news about gun violence, such as a tragic mass shooting somewhere around the world and tons of victims who died from the accident, or husband that shot his wife by accident. Thus, many people, especially people in America, are asking, and even doubting whether or not it is beneficial to own guns at home without a license. In my opinion, I think that owning a gun can be helpful sometimes in some ways, as it can always be the extremely powerful and helpful weapon for self-defense, especially when help from the law enforcement officers are not available.
Comparing crime rates for whites and blacks propose that guns play a role in understanding differences in race. Blacks have a high homicide and aggravated assault rate than whites but not much higher than the simple assault rate for whites. This goes back to the idea of honor culture and the problem with carrying for protection and its tradition of being passed down by generations. A National Violence against women and men survey was conducted that analyzed race and regional differences in gun protection when carrying. The study measured if there were cultural differences in behavior opposed to people’s attitudes. The hypothesis was that if regional differences in carrying disappear then the threat of violence can be controlled. The data