I for one believe Hillary Rodham Clinton is the best presidential candidate of education reform in the 2016 election. Mrs. Clinton has an impeccable record on this issue and consistently fought for the rights of all American’s access to quality education. Her crusade as a public servant for quality education began thirty-three years ago in 1983.The Arkansas school system ranked 50th in the nation. Mrs. Clinton was appointed by Governor Bill Clinton to chair the Educational Standards Committee, to recommend reforms. It is not an exaggeration to say the state’s educational system remains broken. TIME Magazine dubbed Arkansas the long time “Dogpatch of the nation’s school system” However, this crisis in education extended from coast to coast. In pushing for higher standards, Mrs. Clinton stated, “Our schools are not doing as good as they must. While there may be many causes for our dilemma, there is only one solution. We Arkansans have to quit making excuses and accept instead the challenge of excellence once and for all.” (ED Reform,2016) The newly established committee solicited advice from the public, in all of Arkansas 75 counties. Following this extensive research, Mrs. Clinton came up with a comprehensive set of regulations aimed at overhauling the state 's failing education system. The Education Standards committee’s recommendations included: Upgrading curriculum standards and course requirements. Increasing teacher salaries and possible merit pay. Establishing a
It is essential for child of any age to get a form of education. Private or public, school is a necessity for children to expand their knowledge and learn from their mistakes. But, how will a vast eighty-seven percent of the US's children learn if there is not money to invest in their public schools? Mothers Jessica Blatt and Lizzie Scott in their editorial argue that Public schools are not receiving the affection they need. First, Blatt and Scott incorporate emotional diction into their editorial to appeal to the audience's empathetic emotions. Second, Blatt and Scott integrate specific details into their editorial to emphasize the change that needs to happen in the public schooling system. Third, Blatt and Scott manipulate the syntax of their editorial to mirror the how the Public School Watchdogs need supporters now. These establish a passionate devoted tone. Blatt's and Scott's editorial is significant because it enlightens one about the problems happening behind the doors of public education.
“Shrinking state and local education budgets matched with the added pressure of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which sets rigid standards in reading and math that schools must achieve in order to receive federal funding, have created a new challenge for districts” (Van Harken).
The defeat of Initiative 42, Mississippi’s best hope for adequately funding K-12 public school education, was devastating to Mississippi public school educators and their many supporters. Since the defeat, the question has been, “What do we do next?” Like so many others, I questioned if there was any need to even try to fight the system any longer. However, after a lot of thought and soul searching, I am resolved that it is more important than ever before to continue the fight. In fact, I have a plan of action that may sound farfetched on the surface, but it just might work. The plan is at least a step to rekindle the flame that educators and parents must keep burning on this issue.
On December 21, 2000 President-elect Bush met with key congressional in Austin, TX to discuss education reform (Broder,2001.) Republicans and Moderate Democrats attended the luncheon and Bush asked them to dedicate themselves to passing bipartisan education reform over the next several months (Debray,2006.) Notably absent from this initial meeting was Senator Ted Kennedy(D-MA) an early sign that Bush intended to rely on a coalition of New Democrats and Republicans to push through bipartisan education reform. On his second day in office, Bush sent to Congress a 28-page education blue print based on his campaign proposals and four broad principles; “increasing accountability for student performance,” “focus on what works,” “reduce bureaucracy and increase flexibility,” and “empower parents”(Levin, DiSalvo and Martin, 2012.).” The legislative blueprint borrowed liberally from several competing proposals made in the final years of the Clinton administration (Rudalevige, 2006.) Furthermore, by opting to merely sketch out his reform ideas, Bush retained the flexibility to negotiate with all players in Congress and by focusing on broad goals such as accountability and flexibility could claim credit for negotiating in a bipartisan manner (Angerholzer and McGuinn, 2014.) Ultimately, this flexibility proved crucial to the bills success.
She advocates high quality education for all children, including those with disabilities in every part of America, and looks towards ensuring they all thrive in the classroom and in the real world. Clinton believes all children should be guaranteed a high-quality education and has been working to improve and support the public schools for decades (Wellford). While she chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Commission she fought to raise academic standards, increase teacher salaries, and reduce class sizes. As first Bill Clinton was president, she, as first lady, worked to focus on improving access to educational opportunities of the Hispanic children and youth. As a U.S. senator, Clinton served on the Senate Health, Education and Labor Committee, and was a key member of shaping the No Child Left Behind Act, hoping it would bring the necessary resources and accountability in order to improve educational opportunities for the most disadvantaged students. She advocates for education being a priority including bettering the current educators of schools and improving all student outcomes (Hillary for America Starts Right
As President Hillary would work to ensure every child from every ZIP code has access to a world class education, including access to high quality preschool. Clinton says we need to strike the right balance in testing with fewer, fairer and better tests for elementary and secondary school students.She also says we need to support teachers with the training and resources they need. Hillary says ‘’We have to make sure education is available and affordable to everyone’’.
“Democrat presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, says that she has always supported national education standards, and that she wants to see the same set of common standards for all
The list of failing schools in Arkansas was released and not one actual teacher had any comments on the release. Fixing public education always begins from the top and then works its way down to the bottom, where the actual results come from. The school itself has to prove to everyone about them that they are improving. However, every child is different, which is why grades don’t necessarily reflect accurately what children have learned nor does it reflect the real progress they have made. All students are different and all teachers grade differently, along with several other variables than come into play during the grading process. Education reform has already hit a dead end and they are trying to fix it with standardized testing. Standardized
The graduation rate in the United States is approximately 76 percent compared to the graduation rate in Finland which is 95 percent. Based on this major gap one can conclude that there are differences between both school systems. Students’ education system in the United States have a major dark side. This prohibits students’ from learning during school hours. Though many might feel that the American education system is a model of success, compared to the educational system in Finland, the American education system is in dire need of reform.
The Education reform can improve a lot Americans lives by giving them a chance regardless what race,gender, and
When it comes to Hillary Clinton, she declares that as president, she would modernize the education system, reconstruct schools in poor, urban areas, and make sure that every child in the country is given the opportunity to go to school and become educated. Hillary Clinton wants every child to learn computer science, due to how much technology affects our daily lives. She also claims to support the Build America Bonds program that gives cities the money they need to renovate their schools. Moreover, Clinton has made plans to reform college tuitions. She states that after 2021, many families will be able to send their children to a four-year university with no student loan debts.
School districts all over the country have undergone countless changes in just a few years. Are these changes for the better? Children in the current school system are faced with numerous tests every year. Why are they being constantly tested? The ceaseless use of standardized testing is a result of the No Child Left Behind Act. Continuous talk about the No Child Left Behind Act can be heard in the hallways of schools nationwide, but why does it matter? The No Child Left Behind Act plays a major role in our students’ education. The students affected by this act is America’s future. Without school making a positive impact on these students, it will be less likely that they will be motivated to make a positive impact on America in the
Changes such as shifting the majority of the power and influence away from the department to the teachers, are important to the educational system. Individualism is a key factor in achieving educational success. The American Educational System (AES) needs to not only address each individual student and their needs, but also each teacher and how they are approaching their subject matter. The AES also needs to fix the problems that the No Child Left Behind Grant (NCLBG) and standardized testing have created. Also, the AES needs to modernize the educational system and create a learning environment the enables rather than hinders new generation learners.
This book is about a group of parents and community members from Kentucky who became frustrated with the representatives of their state. This group felt a lack of urgency on the part of the politicians to improve the quality of education. They formed a non-profit group that consisted of 30 community members in 1980 and was formalized in 1983. The committee was led by Edward F. Prichard and now recognized as the Prichard Committee. The diligent work of this group paved the way for the Kentucky Education Reform Act in 1990.
The confusion lives and contradictions mount in the field of education. In the last six weeks, I have been introduced to the world of education in a totally different way. I feel like I have been on a roller-coaster that has taken me to extreme highs and lows when it comes to my emotions and perspectives on the subject of ‘English education reform.’ However, I have realized, what we have yet to discover is an effective solution for the problems and issues we have in this field. Whatever happened to valuing the student or valuing the teacher? Instead, we as a nation, have come to value the data-driven assessments from state mandated curriculums that are influenced by the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), “which can underserve students and push towards more product orientated pedagogy. (Peel, 2014, p.72). We also have not seen the appreciation and admiration for the professionals that matter the most in education: the teachers. Is teacher appreciation asking for too much, or is the ultimate goal of ‘subterfuge’ still on the menu for America’s top list of priorities when it comes to education and our country’s youth? The only thing that is clear to me is a nation who is still a major work in progress when it comes to the subject of education and the teachers and students of America who must endure within it.