The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

Machiavelli uses a compound-complex sentence to inform those who want to be a leader the need of malevolent. Machiavelli uses an independent and dependent clause to gain attention from audience with the purpose of clearing his idea. For Machiavelli’s long sentences in the end of the first paragraph, the prince “profession of virtue” will get “destroyed” by other evil. This cause and effect sentence help the audience to have an images of the impossible of a perfect pure personality of a leader. He warn those who want to be a leader that the prince should be wise and knowing when to act evil rather than good. Moreover, he lists good and bad adjectives such as “cruel” and “compassionate” to imply that a good ruler need to be both moral and immoral. .After all the conventional moral advice, he convey to the prince that action that appear good will damage his position, prince’s power, while those that depict as bad will enhance it.

Machiavelli’s interpretation of human nature was greatly shaped by his belief in God. In his writings, Machiavelli conceives that humans were given free will by God, and the choices made with such freedom established the innate flaws in humans. Based on that, he attributes the successes and failure of princes to their intrinsic weaknesses, and directs his writing towards those faults. His works are rooted in how personal attributes tend to affect the decisions one makes and focuses on the singular commanding force of power. Fixating on how the prince needs to draw people’s support, Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of doing what is best for the greater good. He proposed that working toward a selfish goal, instead of striving towards a better state, should warrant punishment. Machiavelli is a practical person and always thought of pragmatic ways to approach situations, applying to his notions regarding politics and

Niccoló Machiavelli’s The Prince is very harsh and opinionated. It is chalk full of information regarding multiple empires and leaders and their ways of governing their subjects. He bases his ideas off of their rulers and adds to their thought processes as well. Another one of his tactics when presenting this information is using analogies and thinking of theoretical circumstances such as, “ A prince being thus obliged to know well how to act as a beast must imitate the fox and the lion, for the lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves” (72-73). This is why The Prince leans more towards a persuasive argument rather than an informative essay. However, because Machiavelli did not write this specifically

Machiavelli says that if someone is loved then they are simply at the mercy of the people you lead and if they are feared then they have no choice but to stay loyal. If a CEO was loved in the situation of having insufficient funds for basic needs then he wouldn't be able to pay his workers. When this happens, the workers will most likely stop loving and respecting their CEO which would cause chaos and eventually a collapse in the company. If this CEO was feared, the workers do not have a choice, they will stay in their place. They do not want to lose their jobs and that could happen if they fall out of line during this rough time. The fear doesn’t give people a choice; they either stay loyal or are removed from the group. I accepted all of Machiavelli’s ideals until the last point he brought up. He envisions that a prince should be seem to have five good qualities: compassion, honor, integrity, humanity and religion. He does not think that they need to have these qualities, just appear to have them. I dissagree with his claim and believe that anyone that is in power should strive to actually possess these admirable qualities, not just fake them. Before actually reading this essay, I did not see why anyone would still use this book to explore options

The Prince by Machiavelli is a fascinating, captivating and petrifying read, thaat probably every president, ruler, CEO, leader has put their hands into. In a nutshell the book is a breakdown of how to grow and maintain power in a political system. Some might consider this book a practical guidebook for a ruler, which is not coincidental seeing that the book is dedicated to the ruler of Florence, Lorenzo de’ Medici. And others have suggested that “The Prince” is a satire, which was poking fun at the already existing form of government and rulers at the time it was written. The beginning of the Prince, show that its list of advice and guidance has to do with a monarchy type of ruling, where absolute power lays in the hands of a single ruler.

He feels like a leader achieves their ultimate power from being feared, while still avoiding the hatred of their people. “A wise prince should establish himself on that which is his own control and not that of others; he must endeavor to avoid hatred” (XVII). This seems slightly contradictory to many of the things that Machiavelli states throughout the book, which lulls us into thinking that he believes violence and aggression are crucial for a prince to keep his power. While he does discuss the benefits and essentiality of violence in many points of the book, he almost always will back it up with softer elements. One example is that a prince might need to use violence on a group of unruly citizens to instill fear in them, but “the prince should make himself feared in such a way that, if he is not loved, at least he escapes being hated.

Niccolò Machiavelli was notorious for his actions and writings as a politician and philosopher, among many other political and humanitarian titles. He lived in a time period during which Italy was rife with political conflict, with city-states battling each other for power. Machiavelli formated specific opinions based on his experiences and what he witnessed of others whilst being in and out of the throes of Italian government. He ended up writing one of his most famous works, “The Prince”, in an attempt to return back to power. Within this work, he analyzes the complexities of governance in a sort of how-to guide style meant for a would-be-ruler. The significance of his analysis comes from his unsentimental and realistic view of human nature

It was written in haste, but the true meaning of the story and all of the hidden meanings prove that Machiavelli was a word wizard and was more advanced than his time. The Basics of Philosophy Although Machiavelli did not consider himself a philosopher, he defiantly was. Having a knack for logic and reasoning lead him to many great things for Italy, and he influenced all that he talked to. This major breakthrough that Machiavelli had changed the world of English and how things were though and how things were written.

What are some of the qualities and strategies Machiavelli recommends to political leaders in the excerpts you read? How does this represent a break with the past?

In the story "The Prince", the author, Niccolo Machiavelli illustrates plenty of key points in what it takes to become a successful Prince. Machiavelli illustrates a true image of the unsympathetic reputation he has carried throughout the years. He explains his ideas on taking over a "free" state and how to take control and rule while still having the peoples respect. In chapter 5, Machiavelli claims that the key to taking over a free state is to destroy it at first.

In my opinion, I think that Machiavelli wrote this book as a guide to help future rulers. In chapter XV he writes, “ My intent is to write something useful to whoever understands it.” For example one of the many pieces of advice that he gives and probably the most important, is that a good prince must have a good foundation. ” In this book Machiavelli provides several examples of characteristics that a prince/ruler should and should not display. Throughout the chapters in the book Machiavelli also provides examples of rulers prior to him writing the book as well as rulers/princes that were present during his time, which display the characteristics that he writes about.

So it is logical to start with the first section of The Prince which is the section focusing on the new princedoms and Free States. One main point that seems to continually bring its self to light throughout the book is the idea that “principalities are hereditary.” This is referring to the fact that the only rulers, princes, in that certain area all come from the same family or lineage and that this concept of royalty is considered “old” or “not new.” If said lineage were to change that would change the meaning of it to “new.” This basically means that the new kingdom, princedom, is entirely new and there was nothing that is related to the current princedom that happened before. A general rule that never fails is: “that whoever is responsible for another’s becoming powerful ruins himself, because this power is brought into being either by ingenuity or by force, and both of these are

Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, is written to show how to acquire and maintain political power. He describes an ideal prince that displays qualities that will make him strong. He wrote a quote that says, “the end justifies the means.” This means that a ruler can do unethical things as long as it results in something good or beneficial. Machiavelli’s writings could also help describe an ideal government. The government must be loved, but also feared. People must like the government, but respect it so that people don't try to overthrow it. He is writing more than just to tell princes how to maintain power. He is writing so rulers do good for their people. He wants people to hold power that can pass reforms for the good of the

The Prince is a novel written in 1513 by Niccolo Machiavelli. This book contains 26 chapters, focusing on acquiring and maintaining political power. In other words, it could be seen as the “do’s and don’ts” of the political world. In Chapters One through Eleven, the author discusses the different

Machiavelli found it really important to study those that came before him. Machiavelli states, “I have been unable to find among my possessions anything which I hold so dear or esteem so highly as that knowledge” It is this knowledge and carefully analysis of history that makes his argument truly compelling. Theorists before him like aristotle used observation and imagination in order to develop their political theory’s. But observation does not determine political success it is the careful analysis and emulation of great leaders . Machiavelli proves this when he says , “ But as to exercise for the mind, the prince ought to read history and study the actions of eminent men,...and above all, do as some eminent men have done in the past,..so that when fortune changes she may find him prepared to resist her blows.” This speaks to the spellbinding nature of Machiavelli’s