The Principles of the Judicial System

The courts play a vital role in the criminal justice system. It provides a forum for laws to be upheld and offers victims justice for crimes committed against them (Siegel, et al., 2011). Furthermore, the role of the court is to impose rulings in a way that is fair and unbiased. While it may be challenging, judges must strive to be impartial and reach decisions based on what the law stipulates. They must also fulfill their role in the criminal justice system by issuing rulings despite the weight of public opinion.

However in the United States we have what is referred to as a dual court system. A dual court system can be defined as a judicial system comprising federal- and state- level judicial systems. A dual court system separates federal and state courts. According to the book a dual court system is advantageous and desirable because it is parallel to federalism. Federalism is a system of government where power is constitutionally divided between central governing body and various constituent units. In the United States, the federal government makes laws, but federalism also gives the state’s power to make their own laws (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worral, 2011). The Founding fathers saw it as a way to serve as check on an abusive or tyrannical government.

Criminal Justice system alludes to the aggregate foundations through which a charged guilty party goes until the point when the allegations have been discarded or the evaluated discipline finished up. The Criminal Justice system comprises of three principle parts: (1) law requirement (police, sheriffs, marshals); (2) settling (courts which incorporate judges, prosecutors, resistance legal advisors); and (3) rectifications (jail authorities, post-trial supervisors, and probation officers). While the three segments of the Criminal Justice system are associated, every segment is

The Public Policy of Crime and Criminal Justice by Marion and Oliver talks about the different types of courts like federal, state, and local level, which are necessary in the criminal justice system because it helps interpret the law and distribute the justice. However, courts are confusing because there are many cases that a judge is going through with many inmates trying to hear their sentences, but it is hard to stay focused on one thing because there are many different attorneys and secretaries and scribers at the center of the courtroom

This paper will cover topics such as; what a court is and what the purpose of the court is. This paper will define the dual court system. In addition this paper will describe the role that early legal codes, the common law and the precedent played in the development of courts. And lastly this paper will identify the role of the courts in the criminal justice system today.

A way that both federal and court jurisdiction is alike because they both have jurisdiction. Eventhough the levels of the courts between state and federal can be different

The government has the authority to arrest, indict, try, and sentence individuals that have been accused of committing a crime. In an attempt to balance this authority the United States Constitution guarantees a number of inalienable rights to protect its citizens against tyrannical government power. These rights create the framework of the adversarial criminal justice system that relies heavily on the advocacy of each party and a relatively passive and impartial judge acting as a neutral arbiter. The objective of this structure is to encourage the advocates to develop relevant facts, evidence, and legal interpretations that determine guilt or innocence. This is distinct from inquisitorial systems of justice where the court plays an active

Each year, approximately ten-thousand people are convicted of crimes that they did not commit (Spring). Ten-thousand people that will never see their kids grow up, ten-thousand people that will miss out on life, ten-thousand people whose lives will never be the same. Men and women are on death row for decades, only to be exonerated after their execution. Where is the justice in that? Prisons are also overcrowded and according to political scientist David Hudson, America holds five percent of the world 's population, but twenty-five percent of the world 's prison population (Hudson). This is partially derived from the overwhelming amount of cases that the justice system takes on, but also because of the harsh sentences. About

The criminal justice system is a complex and often uncoordinated system that operates by enforcing the law and seeking justice across countless jurisdictions. It is comprised of many separate agencies including agencies at the federal, state, and local level. Each agency has its own function and goals while operating at different levels of government. The agencies also represent different concerns and values of the public, creating a fragmented system rather than a monolithic, unified system. A monolithic system would deny the reality that justice in a rural area might not be justice in an urban area. To create a unified system would require our complex society to determine a common set of values and goals (Wright, 1981). It is seemingly impossible that a common set of goals or values would ever be agreed upon by the entire society. Therefore a range of goals and values are represented throughout the separate yet intertwined agencies that comprise the criminal justice system.

Law enforcement in the United States is one of three major components of the criminal justice system of the United States, along with courts and corrections (Schmalleger, 2009). Although there is an inherent interrelatedness between the different groups that make up the criminal justice system based on their crime deterrence purpose, each component operates independently from one another (Schmalleger, 2009). For example, the judiciary is vested with the power to make legal determinations regarding the conduct of the other two components (Schmalleger, 2009).

When it comes to legal disputes the courts are the final decider of what the constitution means. This authority known as judicial review gives the Supreme Court and other federal courts the authority to interpret the constitution. The structure of the Federal judicial system is divided into 3 different courts, and each court plays a pivotal role in the judicial review. Along with the Federal judicial system, there are other factors that affect the judicial review.

The United States court system is the institution were all the legal disputes in the american society are carryed out and resolved. However, one single court is not enough to resolve every single dispute in society and that is why the court system is made up of two different courts, the federal courts and the state courts. Moreover, the federal and state courts are made up of several divisions made to handle legal disputes differently depending on its seriousness. For example, the state court is made up of trial courts of limited jurisdiction and probate courts were cases and disputes originate and then move up to trial courts of general jurisdiction, intermediate apellate courts, and courts of last resort respectively depending on the case.In contrast, the federal court consists of district courts, territorial coutrs, tax court, court of international trade, claims court, court of veterans appeals, an courts of military review which then move on to courts of appeals respectively and may ultimately end up in the United States supreme court. In addition, cases from state court may also appeal into the federal court system but not the other way around.

In our history juveniles have been accused of many crimes, and have been sentenced as adults even though some juveniles are so young that the thought of such a long sentence is crazy. Over the years many laws and systems have changed to accommodate the rise of crime from juveniles to perhaps treat them rather than punish them as adults. With many juvenile cases over the years, these cases have helped shape the system to accommodate better for juveniles and there rights.

There are three women on the Supreme Court, one of whom is Latina, and there is one black justice serving on the Supreme Court (Brown, 2016). This is a major issue. The United States, the “melting pot”, has an extreme lack of diversity in their court system. This is an issue that affects several aspects of society. Decisions made by judges will affect the lives of men, women, and their families. The decisions made by judges can also create law. Unlike political officials, the people do not always have the power to vote judges into their positions. Instead, the people hope that their peers with the power to affect the system choose a candidate that will fight for them. Often times, this does not happen.

This paper is going to be over the ethical misconduct that comes when working for or in a court system. Daily there are criminals being sent to prison and being released from prison; some for crimes that they committed, some for crimes that they were just there at the wrong time for. But is there ever a time where people are sent to serve a sentence for a crime they did not commit? The answer is yes. Many of the public do not have a strong liking for lawyers, judges, or mainly just people that work within the federal or state government. Reason being, sometimes you may have to question the fairness, equity or the integrity of the person to know if they are coming from a good place or not. As a lawyer this may be hard to prove