The Probation Officer And Offender Role

Since 2003, the National Probation Service (NPS) has incorporated the Offender Assessment Systems (OASys), (Bracken, 2010). OASys is a standardised, evidence based instrument used to measure the likelihood of recidivism and ROSH. Consideration is also given, to the circumstances of the offence, the type and vulnerability of the victim and the criminogenic needs associated with offending (NOMS, 2010). Robust risk assessments are a mandatory aspects of professional practice (Kemshall, 2007) however, there are no set guidelines which determine criminality (Howard, 2000). ROSH needs to be assessed individually, as no one static, dynamic or acute risk factor is ever indicative of a specific offending behaviours (Powis, 2002). There has been some

“The Prison and Probation Service has two main goals: To contribute to the reduction of criminality, and to work to increase safety in society. To achieve these goals we work with sentenced persons in order to improve their possibilities of living a life without committing new crimes.” (Linstrom and Leijonram)

This essay will critically reflect on the interventions used in the community to manage offender’s risk by identifying the strengths and weaknesses of communication, between Offender Managers and external agencies. An evaluation will be made of how Offender Managers are able to use feedback from community interventions, to effectively manage an individuals risk throughout supervision sessions and explore different strategies used in order build a relationship and manage compliance throughout an order. This essay will highlight diversity issues raised and how future practice can be improved from reflecting on current work. I will be referring to two case studies drawn from my own practice as a Probation Service Officer (PSO), Mr N and Mr C, and demonstrate how theoretical literature and research has informed decision-making in managing risk and planned interventions.

The available empirical evidence suggests that intensive supervision programs have not reduced the rates of re-offending (Paparozzi & Gendreau, 2005). This is partly due to the fact that these programs often target low-risk offenders, contrary to the research which suggests that high-risk offenders are most likely to benefit from intensive institutional and community-based correctional interventions (Paparozzi & Gendreau, 2005). I would like to note that although this may sound contradicting to what I have written prior about high-risk offenders, the program I am working with in Yorkton is geared towards high-risk offenders and that the research that I have found claims it is not. Even though there is research that suggests this, since I have started in the program, I have seen some major transformation with individuals. I did, however, find some evidence that this program has been effective. A 1998 report found considerable evidence to support the premise that a period of supervised transition from prison to the community enhances public safety and the rehabilitation of offenders. In particular, the process of selection for parole based on the assessment of risk to re-offend and

The world we live is constantly changing whether we are on the streets or in the prison system.

In this case scenario Megan is a new probation officer with little experience working with the criminal justice system. She carries a caseload of seventy offenders and is responsible for many activities to ensure her clients are meeting requirements of their probation. In addition, she is also required to complete trainings on substance abuse and mental health.

I enjoyed your paper, it was one of the best in providing informative details about specific need and risks. Also, it was mentioned that probation officers should focus more on the offender that pose the most benefit from interventions and treatment. In fact, after reading your paper it is safe to infer that regardless of the risk factor, both should be highly supervised. In addition, a low-risk offender could face difficulties and challenges that require immediate attention because this offender may not be required to receive interventions and treatment due to their classification. While, On the other hand, a high-risk offender receiving both practices becomes less vulnerable of reoffending.

As a citizen, a member of my community, and a taxpayer, I greatly admire the work that probation officers and other members of our corrections system do for our society. However, I do not believe enough is being done. Recidivism is “a person 's relapse into criminal behavior, often after the person receives sanctions or undergoes intervention for a previous crime” (National Institute of Justice, 2014). Recidivism is an important measure of program success. The entire purpose of the corrections system is to prevent further crime by providing a punishment for past crimes and rehabilitation for criminal ways of living. If the corrections system does not meet these goals, the recidivism rate will increase. Thus, probation must be highly efficient in order to battle the recidivism rate.

Your paper was clear and informative, it provided detailed information regarding your focus of the topic. In my opinion, probation and correctional officers share some similarities pertaining to their clients and also their needs. Both officers should be able overtime, to provide information pertaining to the needs of that individual. However, due to the work settings, probation officers have more lead way and resources to assist clients. I believe that with patience, time, and good interpersonal skills, a probation officer can successfully connect and assist their clients

If I were sitting on the President’s Council for probation and parole reform, there are four recommendations I would make. These recommendations would aim to increase the success of probation and parole in the United States. In order to improve outcomes for probation and parole, there are necessary steps to take to reduce the state prison costs. One recommendation is the need to create a program that can provide more incentives financially to departments in order to minimize state prisons. I suggest funding the program through private sectors and savings organized through the funds paid by probationers. Probation departments use incentives payments and promote better safety for the public. (Latessa & Smith, 2011) The new program should involve

When it comes to being convicted of a crime, the sentence given differs depending on the crimes the person who committed the crime, and the statues in place. One possible sentence is probation. Placing someone convicted on a crime on probation can serve a specific purpose and be administered in different ways, can come with a number of restrictions, and can also be taken away as an option to who request it. Incarceration is not the only option when it comes to sentencing. There is always an alternative.

My career I have chosen is a juvenile probation officer. A JPO or juvenile probation officer looks after youth who have been found guilty or convicted of a crime or been placed under protective supervision. JPO’s work very close to schools, law enforcement, and families. They also must make sure their clients are in compliance with the legal system. This field interest me because I love the legal system. Also, I love being able to help young people better themselves so that society can see the good in them. There are kids who turn to violence because that is all they know. I feel as though I could be the one to make them change for the better.

I have always wanted to become a probation Officer. When i was little i wasn't sure what it would take all i knew is that being one would make me very happy. I know some stuff about them and what they do only because my brother had one as well as my cousin for personal reasons. If you keep reading you will know all about what it takes to be one and what they do.

(Harris, pg. 381) Interactions between social workers, probation officers, treatment providers and offender supports should be utilized as a check-in, in-order to monitor behavior and to see where the offender is in relation to his/her non-offending peers. This process would require updates on the offender specific treatment goals set, the progress at school, work or both work, stable housing, relational interactions (with parents, significant other or children), as well as a progress report from any providers or court appointed supports to obtain an overall idea of the offenders engagement and motivation to continue being a constructive contributing member of his/her community. When considering the probation approach which is often punitive we must consider multiple factors, it offers little room for error and the consequences are never individualized. The black and white approach to restoration and reintegration does not include the social service aspect of hope and improvement (Flesaker and Larsen, pg.

Probation and parole are an important part of the criminal justice process, and both are