The Problem Of Criminal Behavior Among Juveniles

. A juvenile detention center is a secure prison for young adults under the age of 18, often form juvenile delinquents. Though which they get sentenced for the crime they committed for a period. Life after being detained in a juvenile corredional faculty can be a difficult transition for a child. Have you ever followed the wrong crowd and did something you regret? Well that is what juvenile detention is for, kids who committed an illegal act.

Studies suggest that there is a divide between the government and public response to juvenile incarceration. Bullis & Yovas (2005) state that support is given to correctional facilities to house juvenile offenders as a form of punishment (as cited in Shannon, 2013, p. 17). Individuals who support this perspective are often more likely to support the construction of more prisons and stern penalties on crime based upon the presumptions that youthful offenders are aware of the consequences of their actions (Drakeford, 2002 as cited in Shannon, 2013, p. 17). On the other hand, opponents of this perspective believe that incarceration creates an opportunity to rehabilitate the offenders (Huffine, 2006 as cited in Shannon, 2013, p. 18). This perspective supports the purpose of juvenile detention centers as “preparatory in nature – that is, offering services focused on the development of skills needed to return successfully to mainstream

Over 1/3 of the 11,000 index crime arrests were juveniles under the age of 16.

Juvenile Justice Centers do not help the children in the centers in any way, and they do not care about the children either. These centers do more harm than good. They do not support children with learning disabilities, emotional and behavioral problems, and health issues. Also, it is very hard to get a high school diploma, and even to finish high school while locked up.

The high incarceration rate of juveniles is a significant social problem that affects society as a whole as well as the youth’s individual welfare and developmental trajectory. Adolescents who are incarcerated in the juvenile justice system face a multitude of negative lifelong implications. The history of incarcerating youth in residential facilities such as juvenile halls, camps, ranches or group homes as a consequence for committing crimes has a deep-rooted history in the United States. “For more than a century, the predominant strategy for treatment and punishments of serious and sometimes not-so-serious juveniles offenders in the US has been placement into large juvenile corrections institutions” (Mendel, 2013, p.4). During the 18th and early 19th century, the judicial system harshly reprimanded youth and confined them in overcrowded penitentiary institutions with populations of adult offenders and the severely mentally ill (Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, 2014).

The ability to attempt to make a better and safer society can begin by being able to determine criminal behavior in children based on personal characteristics, demographic factors, generational factors, and/or abuse problems. The use of a neural network could be used in an effort to make these predictions with science and technology. A neural network is a type of artificial intelligence system used to make predictions based on a wide variety of information and patterns (Haag, S., & Cummings, M. 2013). The ability to be able to predict potential criminal behavior in children can possibly be thwarted with education and behavioral adjustments. Criminal behavior can be detected in children as young as 6 (Lowry, 2013). Parole boards use

Youth crime is the crime committed by juvenile offenders. It is the common issue in Australia. The age group between 14-19 years old is the popular group of youth crime. (News 2013) Different age groups commit different types of crimes. (The youth court 2009) Also, there are many kinds of crime and crime method in the society, such as, drug offences, robbery, burglary, assault and violent offenses. The group of people who crime together that is called criminal group. It is a prevalence crime method and it is effective for crime. This question will focus on what is youth crime, the change of youth crime in recent year and the relationship between drug offences and the youth crime in Australia.

The failure of the juvenile detention systems is clearly demonstrated by a lack of direction for the youth. An outstanding 55 percent of the youth put out on probation are rearrested in a 12 month period according to a recent study at youth.gov. This may very well stem from the lack of attention to the children while incarcerated. Punishment is often used as a way of “correcting” the youth. This often escalates into maltreatment of the kids

In addition, near 90,000 Juveniles offenders are held in some type of residential facility in the United States. As with adults, the incarceration of juveniles is often justified as keeping communities safer, but according to Matt DeLisi and colleagues (2011) confinement in juvenile facilities negatively impact on youths’ physical and mental health and increased subsequent offending. As with adult offenders, we must do a better job of deciding whom to send to prison and ensuring that programs are available for them when sent to prison. Targeting intervention within the facilities is essential due to many of our youths having mental health issues and those individuals of criminogenic (substance abuse offender) addicts

Juvenile detention facilities are a secure jail or prison for minors under the age of eighteen. Delinquents are sent there to await a trial or sent there for long-term care facilities and programs. Juveniles go through a separate court system than adults, which is the juvenile court. There are many different pathways for juveniles to take once processed in the juvenile court. the appearance in court and secure confinement implies that a juvenile has been committed. Other kinds of facilities are group homes, training schools, shelters, ranch/wilderness camps, and reception/diagnois centers. According, to the Juvenile Justice textbook, the juvenile justice system stresses rehabilitation rather than punishing youths. What effective ways juvenile facilities do to reduce recidivism? Corrections has served several goals from retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, and rehabilitation “More than 70 percent of the public agree that incarcerating youthful offenders without rehabilitation is the same as giving up on them” (the textbook).

Dmitrieva et al. (2012) draws attention to the two most common types of detention for juvenile offenders being secure facilities and residential treatment facilities (Dmitrieva et al 2012, p. 1074). Secure facilities are punishment oriented, whereas residential treatment facilities place high emphasis on rehabilitation, requiring participation in services such as education programs and counselling. When deciding on the youth’s consequence for their crime, the juvenile’s potential for change and risk for future offending must be taken into consideration (Steinberg 2009, p. 465). Juvenile’s who have an extensive list of prior offences or are perceived to be unlikely to benefit from rehabilitation are deemed more likely to reoffend and are therefore more likely to be incarcerated for the purpose of punishment rather than rehabilitation. In order for a decision to made in the child’s best interest, policy makers and mental health professionals need to be able to recognise and understand the developmental changes that occur during childhood through to adolescence regarding competence, culpability and likeliness to respond to treatment (Steinberg 2009, p. 465). For the Juvenile Justice System to affectively deter future offending, this information is essential, as there is no point incarcerating a child that has no understanding of the crime they

In the past several years researchers have found intervention strategies and program models that hope to prevent juvenile delinquency and promote good social attitudes and development (Greenwood, 2008). More than 1,000,000 adolescents go through the American Criminal court system every year and of those approximately 160,000 juvenile offenders are sent to juvenile placement centers (Henggeler & Schoenwald, 2011). The U.S. criminal justice system has been wise enough to realize that treatment programs need to be implemented in order to lessen recidivism in these young offenders and help ensure that they go on to live healthy productive lives.

Overall, the research collected has examined juvenile delinquency, the persistent consequences of incarceration, and suggestive measures from the Public Defenders that could help reduce recidivism and provide justice for the offenders, the victims and the community. The research highlighted the crime pattern in young offenders, existing racial disparities in the juvenile criminal justice system and the lack of a proper support structure that encourages the youth to make bad choices. Studies included in the research demonstrated that most juvenile delinquents belong to underprivileged backgrounds, where their mental and educational needs are not properly addressed. They don’t receive community policing and are more likely to be viewed as criminals by the Law Enforcement and the public. Given their poor background, these children are more likely to be incarcerated than their counterparts and conclusively have a poor

An alternative to channeling youth into a lifetime of criminal behavior by taking into account the different developmental needs of youth and the interests of society should remain the priority. Retaining youth in prisons will actually harm the public as opposed to if youth were placed in more community-based programs or smaller facilities near the youth’s community. When adolescence are placed in prison, their chances of avoiding the system later in life decrease drastically. Youth become subject to becoming repeat offenders. In a study conducted by Anna Aizer of Brown University and Joseph Doyle, Jr. of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, they were able to pinpoint the effects of adolescents who found themselves in youth prisons. Youth who were incarcerated were less likely to finish their education and more likely to become repeat offenders committing homicide, violent crime, property crime and drug crimes. Adolescence will find themselves stuck in this ‘revolving door’ in the justice system, which may be exceptionally challenging to get out

Teen delinquency can also arise when a teen’s parent is incarcerated. Teens that have a parent in prison are affected emotionally, behaviorally and psychologically (Johnson 461). The incarceration of a parent can gravely affect an individual because the parent is not prevalent throughout the teen’s life. The teen then becomes angry and acts out because they have so much emotional pain bottled up inside. “The children of incarcerated parents are at a high risk for a number of negative behaviors that can lead to school failure, delinquency, and intergenerational incarceration” (Simmons 10). Teens with incarcerated parents lack the assistance of parental figures. In True Notebooks, Sister Janet says that the incarcerated teens never had anyone to lead them in the right path or show that adults care about them. She says that because of the lack of direction the teens never had the opportunity to do better for themselves (Salzman 26). There is also a major cycle that exists between incarcerated parents and their children that puts these teens at risk. On April 10th of 2008, a conference at Bryant University was held to discuss the concerning issues of teens with incarcerated parents. During the conference, Patricia Martinez, director of the Rhode Island Department of Children: Youth and families stated that “We want to break the cycle of intergenerational crime. I have heard of so many caseloads managing 18-year-olds who had a parent