The Problem Of Human Rights Law

The issue of homelessness in regard to shelter in Australia has been prevalent for an extended period of time in the 21st century. Homelessness is the situation in which individuals are unable to attain a permanent and adequate quality of shelter. Shelter is a human right as stated under article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which specifies “Housing” as part of the standard of living required for an individual to maintain their wellbeing. Australia’s law specifies no legal right to shelter, however as a party of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), the Australian government must recognise that all individuals should be entitled to “an adequate standard of living for themself and their family”, where one criteria is “adequate housing” as stated in article 11. It is imperative that in order to fulfil both Australia’s obligation to uphold human rights and maintain social cohesion within society both legal and non-legal responses are effective in dealing with both the causes and effects of homelessness.

Homelessness has increasing become one of the most pressing and urgent social political problems of our time. It is argued that three of the most important policy issues are health, housing and income. Homelessness is defined as a situation in which an individual lacks a fixed, regular and adequate residence during the night. This definition excludes individuals in correctional facilities or those detained by law. The case is clearly depicted in urban communities, where thousands of people live on the streets or shelters. In rural areas the case of homelessness is less prevalent in that, homeless persons are likely to live with a relative or friends in

Homelessness experiences serious violation against human rights, essentially where sustainable and conventional shelter cannot be maintained. From early on, it has influenced the spiritual, legal and economic aspects of Australia, forever changing the culture of our history. As a consequential issue, homelessness has not been minimised, currently affecting our modern society, especially influencing our younger generations.

The Constitution of India is imbued with the spirit of promoting and protecting the human rights of its constituents. But, merely incorporating a comprehensive bill of rights will not deliver the goods. And, although Article 32 of the Constitution assures an individual the right to move the Supreme Court of India for the enforcement of his/her rights, other constraints (like court fees, large back log of pending cases, and the intricacies of legal procedures leading to inordinate delay in justice) make the legal option difficult and almost unapproachable for the ordinary person. The implementation of laws that guarantee constitutional rights can be overseen by special administrative or institutional measures. The Indian Government has set up many special institutions under different acts of parliament and the primary task of these institutions is to give effect to various constitutional rights, particularly the rights of vulnerable and disadvantaged groups. One such important institution is the National Human Rights Commission. In order to understand the powers and functioning of this commission it is necessary to know the various Indian Laws relating to Human Rights.

A great speech has the power to define the times, to inspire, and to motivate. Certain speeches from great people have made huge impacts, but “The Struggle for Human Rights” from Eleanor Roosevelt persuades the entire globe on humans’ rights, freedom, respect and peace. I read her text and saw a video on YouTube giving her speech even though it was long it gathered a lot my attention. It took me time to understand her speech after reading it three times. It’s good that someone like Eleanor Roosevelt existed and wanted to provide some peace to the world. I’m glad she touched many hearts in that time. War may still exist and can be caused but we should all take a glance to this speech and acknowledge what Eleanor was trying to do. She fought for social and civil rights, helped found the United Nations, and effectively ran the United Stated when her husband was ill. As shown above, all those awful situations led Eleanor Roosevelt to do such a speech as “The Struggle for Human Rights”.

a) Natural right- this refers to the right that an individual has from nature. Such a right is not given by anybody to the person. It is a right that comes naturally for the person. An example is a right to life. This is a right that everybody has naturally. Since this right comes naturally, for those who believe in God say that it is God given right, it should not be taken away from the owner. It should be left to go by itself. Taking away this right is violating the right of the person. For example in Pakistan, the natural right to life of a seven-month pregnant woman was violated by her parents when they cut off her throat thus killing her. The report says that a pregnant

The definition of the term human rights is described as the essential universal entitlements afforded to all humans. These rights are the underpinning of certain principles including that of liberty, fairness and respect of human dignity. Human rights must be acknowledged and protected by government agencies to ensure that these rights are taken into account in law, the process of legislation, public policy and politics.1 However many groups within society remain marginalised and vulnerable to human rights violations. The focus issue that will be discussed in this essay is the right to liberty- to not be apprehended in arbitrary custody, which interferes with the inherent human right to liberty, and the chosen vulnerable group is asylum seekers. Due to circumstances outside of their control the persons in this group flee their homelands in an effort to escape crisis and persecution, such as religious and political persecution.2 Every human has the right of asylum, as stated in article 14 of the Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, however asylum seekers are vulnerable due to violations of their human rights. Governments around the globe including Australia have not fulfilled their legal obligations toward asylum seekers and have in fact violated human rights and specific rights of asylum seekers which have been outlined in the 1951 UN Convention in relation to status of refugees.3

Housing, in fact, is also a human right. It’s included in Article 25 as a component on the right to an adequate standard of living. Yet, too often the rights of the world’s homeless aren’t

All individuals are allow to certain basic rights in every part of the world. Without consideration of the circumstances, nobody has fairly or righteously impowered to take away these basic rights from ordinary citizens of particular country. The human rights are of different types of rights like, political rights and civil liberty rights. The most significant constitutional human right available to a human being of right to life and physical safety. According to Donnelly and Howard Human rights are the expression of the need for self respect, impartiality, legitimacy, integrity and just ness. The idea of human rights support the scope of justice and virtual. However,several organizational and country heads emphasize the need of women’s human rights and its violation has always been a common phenomenon in different parts of the world(Donnelly & Howard 1987).As, India is home to a growing democracy and to recent magnificent country economic growth. Unfortunately, this has not protected different kind of serious women’s human right abuses and it is remaining a fact of life in many parts of the India.

Human rights are fundamental rights are for every individual as a human being, they are inherent and protected as international laws. The importance of Human rights is indubitable, there is an obligation for everyone to respect other’s rights and they should not be breached. However, David Hicks whose rights have been obviously breached and against by the US government, in terms of the universal declaration of human rights and convention against torture, the treatment that the US government treated to David Hicks is unjustified. This essay will discuss the unjustified actions of US government and explain the reason why they are unjustified.

The gay community has been thriving over the last several years especially within the law, state after state bans fell and proposals passed. The movement is finally being recognized and basic rights are being promised to them in several courts around the country. In states like Idaho one could be fired or be denied housing for being gay, and that being the sole reason. When the bill, to add sexual orientation to the human rights act, was simply eligible to be put up to a vote the people who proposed it were overjoyed. They know the road is long and still work towards it, the smallest accomplishments feel like strides. Why is this attitude still

The inalienable human rights is something undeniably important in the view of everyone in the world, as nearly all government in the world have some sort of written law that ensure the rights of its citizens, like the Bill of Rights that protect the rights of Americans. Yet, when applying that significance in protecting human rights to people outside of their nation’s border depend considerably on the interests of the government, the interactions between the different nations, and the response concluded from the international institution, like the United Nations. As evident through the events in Rwanda, all members of the United Nation Security Council expressed their concerns and sadness about the human rights abuses in Rwanda by the Rwandan government, yet, when debating on the course of action, only a minority of the members actually supported humanitarian intervention in Rwanda. The violations on the principle of human rights in Rwanda were ignored as several council members cited the lack of funds and resources, along with infringement on sovereignty to be the reasons of nonintervention, despite the widespread support of these natural rights. Even if a proposal of intervention was passed, the movement to protect these human rights often failed due to the difficulty to come to a compromise when determine how the intervention would played out, as countries tried to pursue the policy in their own stance, as well as the crucial aspect of the response time. Although the

It is clear that in China there is certainly a lack in the belief of what constitutes proper ethics regarding the treatment and freedom of citizens is. The government of China is a one party system meaning that only one political organization exists, and it is the communist party. The communist viewpoint is that society should be classless, everything should be communal in the sense there is no private ownership, and the leaders of the party are to enforce communist policies and put new ones in place in order to lean the society towards an overall goal of both betterment and equality. This does not sound like the way China is operated now. Frequently, vast and numerous cases of basic human rights violations pertaining to freedom, and a plethora of other categories are brought to the attention of the world. Even though China signed the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) outlining what rights and fundamental freedoms every person is inarguably entitled, China often violates these rights and the government claims that in doing so “social stability” is maintained. The acceptance of, and participation in such violations by the Chinese government makes it apparent that the best interests of the communist party, and economic prosperity are held in higher regard than human rights. Throughout the following dissertation, human rights violations in China will be explored and expanded upon. In addition these violations will be

Glendon, Mary Ann (2002). A world made new: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Random House. ISBN

Human rights are universal rights which we hold claim to just because we are human (London and Ragaven-Baldwin, 2006:20). These rights span across all dimensions of our lives- from promoting equality and liberty to ensuring that our needs to live a dignified life are met. The purpose of this essay is to explore the implementation of human rights and the Patients’ rights charter in health care. This will be done by referring to the famous McGeary case, which caused a lot of uproar and debate around the issue. I will then move on to outline the lessons I have drawn from this case and how these have contributed towards making me an integrated health professional (IHP).