The Problem Of Human Rights

a) Natural right- this refers to the right that an individual has from nature. Such a right is not given by anybody to the person. It is a right that comes naturally for the person. An example is a right to life. This is a right that everybody has naturally. Since this right comes naturally, for those who believe in God say that it is God given right, it should not be taken away from the owner. It should be left to go by itself. Taking away this right is violating the right of the person. For example in Pakistan, the natural right to life of a seven-month pregnant woman was violated by her parents when they cut off her throat thus killing her. The report says that a pregnant

All individuals are allow to certain basic rights in every part of the world. Without consideration of the circumstances, nobody has fairly or righteously impowered to take away these basic rights from ordinary citizens of particular country. The human rights are of different types of rights like, political rights and civil liberty rights. The most significant constitutional human right available to a human being of right to life and physical safety. According to Donnelly and Howard Human rights are the expression of the need for self respect, impartiality, legitimacy, integrity and just ness. The idea of human rights support the scope of justice and virtual. However,several organizational and country heads emphasize the need of women’s human rights and its violation has always been a common phenomenon in different parts of the world(Donnelly & Howard 1987).As, India is home to a growing democracy and to recent magnificent country economic growth. Unfortunately, this has not protected different kind of serious women’s human right abuses and it is remaining a fact of life in many parts of the India.

Every single human being on this planet has rights. These rights are given to us through birth, and the day I was asked, what my human rights were, I found myself speechless. I did not know how to answer the question, which at the time sounded so easy. I forgot about the question that had me so puzzled, and just brushed it off, ironically six month later I get an assignment on the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. After reading this historic document, I realized how important human rights are. I believe most people take human rights for granted, we know they exist, but we don’t even know what they are

As stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights “the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world” (United Nations 1948). In theory, human rights can have a universal application, as all human beings are entitled to their natural rights. However, for the rights to be successfully applicable there must be a change in greater society. One of the main barriers is the lack of cultural relativism. This results in states disagreeing with the rights that should be ratified and enforced. Another challenge is the lack of enforcement and the lack of accountability for states to give citizens their rights. As the doctrine is non-binding and exclusive towards certain cultures there is an outlook on human rights being centered towards the west. Moreover, although there is a huge movement to make human rights universally applicable there is yet to be a “model of human rights for the entire world” (Glendon 2004 pg.15).

After examining the readings, it is easy to conclude that unauthorized immigrants to the United Sates do not have enough rights. There are laws that protect migrants, such as a few that were discussed in “The Development of International Human Rights Laws” which protects individuals from torture, or enslavement; individuals also have their right of freedom of religion, along with other basic human rights that were not mentioned (Laets). However, the doctrine that was signed by the United States to protect people within its borders is still lacking in important rights that could further protect migrants from harm.

The supporting and advocating on behalf of human rights has been one of the primary principles of the world in forming human rights. Since its founding in 1945, the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights has worked to preserve the basic human rights and fundamental freedoms it believes to be deserved of by every man, woman, and child on the planet. In efforts to eliminate violations of human rights, building awareness and protesting inhumane treatment has often led to calls for action and sometimes improved conditions. Everyone has duties in the world and have human rights in to acknowledge their full ability to be who they are and not be punished for that. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare of others.

In many parts of the world, people are discriminated against, whether it be for their race, gender or religion. The people don't get a voice in society. There are many cases of discrimination in the Middle East such as men killing their own family because they are embarrassed by them. In other instances, girls are denied education as learned in “Afghanistan: Girls Struggle for an Education”. People may think that the things that happened during the Holocaust would never happen in today's time, but unfortunately, the spirit of the Holocaust still lives on. Even though the Holocaust happened many years ago, human rights are still being violated in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Syria.

What are human rights? Human rights are so basic that those who are lucky enough to have them may take them for granted. We drink clean water; have sufficient, uncontaminated food and access to good health care; are able to go to school, say or write what we think (within limits), practice our beliefs, safely earn a living and vote for a political party; and expect to be treated fairly by others. Yet not all people in the world have these basic needs met or protected. Nearly one-third of the world's population lives in poverty, without adequate food, water, education and health care. Many people are discriminated against because of their gender, race, religious beliefs or disability. Many people face unfair work practices, illegal detention, persecution, torture and death because their governments

“America did not invent human rights. In a very real sense human rights invented America”-Jimmy Carter. America is not a unique culture, but variety of ideas put it together. As the matter of fact, the United States of America has adopted a lot of knowledge, ideas, habits, and fashions throughout its development. Back in days, rights were given to white Americans, but refute to other ethnic groups that live in the country. Previously, white people were well educated. Due to this reason, they were considered the upper class and get treated differently. Definitely, this was a huge problem in history that caused many conflicts within the nation. Today, the government is upsetting to figure out ways to deal with this obstacle. In the meantime, most states have been working on this particular problem to solve prejudice against other ethnic groups. The United States has improved race relation by understand more of human rights and tolerate ways to treat people the way human beings deserved to be treated; however, there are many tools that give out false information that raise the problem to an intense point.

Everyone agrees that human rights are important, even people who do not think that they are effectively enforced. History has been building up to having human rights for centuries now all over the world, conflicts and rebellions can almost always be traced back to the violation of rights. Even biblically with Moses delivering Israel and freeing the Jewish people from Egyptian enslavement, people felt that they were entitled as human beings to more than what they were getting. The language did not exist yet, but the principles were emerging. This essay will look at how people might perceive human rights, as they currently are, as a defeat of the collective and whether human rights can be successfully utilised as a way to protect collectives and their human rights. The first thing to do is look at how current human rights laws, specifically international ones, are individualistic and how group rights (or collective rights) differ. Moving on: how human rights can be seen as a defeat of the collective before looking at whether or not human rights can effectively be conceptualised as a protection for collectives. Eventually concluding that if groups are given rights, not instead of but alongside individual rights, society will be a lot more peaceful and minorities will be better protected.

Waldron’s assertion that rights are “by its very nature … an individualistic theory” because their purpose is to “secure goods for individuals”. Yet it does not necessarily follow that the requirements to be a rights-holder are restricted to individuals. Instead, this school of thought simply reflects the predominance of classical liberal theory in rights discourse and its legal canon. Green suggests that this is why certain interests associated with individualist qualities such as liberty and security are seen to be legitimate while other more communitarian interests, such as common enterprise, cooperative activity and group well-being, are not. Indeed, Marie-Benedicte goes so far as to suggest that human rights represent a “false aspiration” due to the prevalence given to the individual to the exclusion of solidarity, and so undermines the stability of mainstream human rights thinking. In this way, collective rights can be conceptually plausible within the rights discourse, and this is surely desirable if it provides more comprehensive protection of human rights.

The international community has been paid close attention to the human rights issues since the World War II, and the importance of human rights as well as individual freedoms has been emphasized increasingly. According to Donnelly, human rights are the essential aspects that every person should be entitled. Even though human rights legislation may be different because of the political structure of the various sovereign states, there are still fundamental human rights that should be universal to all countries in the world, for example, food, personal security and the freedom of thought. These are the basic needs that should be provided to every human being throughout the world. Failure to adhere to them is, therefore, the violation of human rights. Furthermore, while enjoying one’s human rights, the individual should also respect and protect others’ rights, which is considered to be the correlative responsibilities of his rights (Donnelly, 2013).

What can be considered as a human right? As quoted “Human rights are moral rights possessed by all human beings simply in virtue of their humanity.” Human rights are entitled to all human beings disregarding everything that divides and splits one human being from another. Things like religion and nationality can’t take away ones right to be considered a human.

Human rights are very important and need to be protected. Mother Jones, Cesar Chavez and William Barber fought for human rights in one way or another. Mother Jones and Cesar Chavez fought for workers rights, while William Barber fights for civil rights. All of these individuals showed courage and determination while fighting for human rights.

There are many countries which deny their inhabitants’ civilian rights. These human rights repudiation and violation are very common. Most riots and chaos happen because of emplacement comes in the scale of justice and whenever the injustice takes place in human rights many people lose their lives and human rights gets violated. There are many countries which are not concerned about their human rights because of the ongoing corruption in the government. Human rights cannot endure without the consistent responsibilities and duties.