The Problem Of Performance Appraisals

Development of a performance appraisal system that is effective in a human service organization is of benefit for the organization and the employees. For a performance appraisal system to be effective, the system has to be strategic, designed to fit the specific needs of the organization, non-discriminatory, non-bias, with correct implementation and administration. Many different components, must to be incorporated to make this type of system beneficial for all who use it, and all who are evaluated by the system.

After reviewing exhibit 7.4.2, list what you regard as the major problems with the Darby appraisal system. Make specific recommendations about changing the system.

The performance appraisals process is flawed in many ways. Lack of preparation, time, training, and professionalism are a few examples of how the system is flawed. The individual completing the application often has many tasks that supersedes taking the appropriate time necessary to accurately keep notations of an employee's performance throughout the year. The lack of time leads to an employee receiving a performance review on the most recent accounts of his or her job performance instead of his or her performance throughout the entire year. Lack of professionalism can also hurt the appraisal process. An employee should be rated by his or her job duties instead of the personal opinion or feelings the manager or supervisor completing the form. All

Performance evaluations, when implemented properly, act as a tool for improving employee productivity, team performance and individual development. They can serve to raise self-esteem, increase motivation, strengthen relationships and foster ongoing communication and commitment (Simpson, 2001). I feel that these reviews play a critical role in the workplace and should remain a part of standard operating procedures, however many are beginning to disagree.

At too many organizations, the performance appraisal has degenerated into a mere formality. Employers and employees are jointly complicit, dutifully sitting across from one another but simply going through the motions, ticking off goals and targets achieved over the past 12 months, those that weren’t, and a new set of goals and targets for the next 12 months. As performance management tools, these by-the-numbers appraisals don’t hold much value for most companies, and they do little to raise employee engagement, commitment or satisfaction levels. However, rather than simply abandoning performance appraisals altogether, as some have implied, a growing number of employers are turning around this state of affairs. They’re reinventing performance reviews and reaping substantial rewards.

Most managers that I know, get a tight feeling in their stomach every time they are reminded that they need to begin working on their performance reviews. Depending on how large your team is, completing performance reviews can be a daunting task. Hopefully you have been good at recording your employees’ individual successes and failures over the course of the year. Performance appraisals serve many purposes within an organization. Answering the questions below will help us understand why they are a standard at most companies.

Although Performance Management evolved from performance appraisals few decades ago, most literature still intensely focuses on performance appraisals when addressing performance management.

“Performance appraisals can enhance employee performance as well as advance the mission and goals of an organization. There are many advantages of performance appraisals if they are applied fairly, consistently and objectively. Performance appraisals not applied fairly can be counterproductive and even destructive to

Performance management is the foundation for employee performance and engagement…it is larger than the annual performance review (“Guide to,” 2016). It is not merely a tool, but rather an act – an act of management (Ammons, 2015). One key best practice of performance management is having an effective appraisal cycle, as well as knowing how vital performance feedback is to the appraisal cycle and to the overall wellbeing of the human resources and to the company.

Trent has several facts that he needs to consider about how he handled Ms. Smith’s appraisal. The purpose of the performance appraisal is to advise the employee concerning the value of their performance. Performance appraisals should reinforce the manager and employee relationship. Trent’s method of presenting Smith’s appraisal was discouraging and upsetting because she stormed out of the office. He only stated her weaknesses and hinted that she did not really fit in his department. He did not set any short-term improvement goals and a follow-up date to ascertain if Ms. Smith had shown any improvement. He did not give her a copy of her appraisal. One of the facts that Trent needs to consider is that he did not follow the performance appraisal guidelines. In fact, everyone should receive a copy of their appraisal. Another fact that Trent should consider is that he did not have enough documentation available to confirm that she had an inadequate work performance and an unpleasant attitude. He is basing her performance from his negative personal feelings about Ms. Smith. Trent felt that Ms. Smith was a “problem” employee. If Trent did not record any oral warnings or written reprimands in her record, this is another fact that he needs to consider. He has to record the exact times and dates that he has spoken to Ms. Smith about her attitudes and performance. Additionally, he has to provide specific and objective facts in her employee file to prove that

Performance appraisals are a hot subject in management and organizations these days. Organizations rely on employees to complete business tasks in a timely and competent manner because their reputation may depend on the performance of its employees. It’s essential that organizations develop a performance management system to assist in evaluating their employees. The performance management system is usually used for annual employee evaluations. The performance management system can be performed in various formats such as rating employees on a scale of 1 to 10 or giving a rating of excellent, good, average, or poor. Now, that I have discussed what performance management system is, it’s time that I elaborate on an example of this system.

In order for the design and administration of a performance appraisal system; to be effective; managers and employees must communicate on a regular basis. Allan and Rosenberg (1981) stated, “Performance appraisal system plays a number of roles in an organization that’s geared towards achieving the company’s goals and mission. Beginning at the corporate level, values, behaviors, and goals should be identified; these must support the company’s strategic mission and promote the success of the business. The basic purpose of performance appraisal system involves two parts, (1) an evaluation system, the evaluation

Due to the growing focus on the personnel’s development, there is an increasing concern regarding the use of effective assessment methods. Performance appraisals are being used by a large number of organizations for assessing their employee’s performance and its effects on the organization as a whole. Similarly, universities make use of the assessment methods to assess the learning of their students. Despite the Popularity of performance appraisals there is an ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness of the assessment methods and use of performance appraisals (Schraeder, Becton & Protis, 2007). This believe can be further strengthen up by the research done by Clinton O & Stephen J, which shows that less that 20

Benjamin franklin once said “An investment in knowledge pays the best interest”. Training is not something that is optional in a company, training is absolutely vital part of a company’s long term investment and growth strategy. Some things companies should think about when considering training and growing a company are the way technological advancements change the way organizations deliver training to employees, the advantages an organization can benefit from by having an effective training program. Organization leaders should also consider the importance of global perspective, and the various types of analysis used to determine organizational training needs. training can also help an organization accomplish strategic goals. When creating

Ans - Performance Appraisal is the systematic evaluation of the performance of employees and to understand the abilities of a person for further growth and development because IT Is a assessment of an individual’s performance in a systematic way, the performance being measured against such factors as job knowledge, quality and quantity of output, initiative, , supervision, reliability, leadership abilities cooperation, judgment flexibility, health and the like and Assessment should not be confirmed to past performance alone Potentials of the employee for future performance must also be assessed.