The Problems with Voting in America Essay

Getting to polling locations can be a hassle, especially for the disabled, the sick, and people without transportation. In addition, voting becomes even more difficult for

It doesn’t take a political expert to see that the 2000 presidential election between Bush and Gore was extremely illegitimate. This can be observed through the recount incident which took place in the state of Florida. Many people, especially seniors, felt that they had not voted for the right candidate, which was due to a confusing ballot setup. The ballots were called “butterfly ballots”. These ballots, as one could imagine, had candidates on either side which the voter could choose from. Seems simple enough, right? Unfortunately, that was not the case. The font on the ballots were extremely minuscule, as well as condensed. To add to that, the voter had to use a pin to make a puncture next to their selection. Some people, who were either

As technology has evolved there have become more ways to cast a vote than ever before. Most people are familiar with the traditional way of

The election of 2000 between George W. Bush and Al Gore was in my opinion, not legitimate. It all started in Palm Beach, Florida, where voters claimed that the voting card was confusing and they weren’t sure if they voted for Pat Buchanan on accident. “Revote! The ballot is unfair! It should be clearer where you're punching.”₁ The person responsible for the confusion was Theresa LePore. She spread candidate names onto both sides of the ballot because she said that when the names were listed on one side that the print was tiny “I was worried that the older voters would have trouble reading them.”₁ For this reason, voters in Palm Beach demanded a revote. The law in Florida states that any difference under .5% triggers a mandatory machine recount,

I think voting should be done via EVMs in the following essay I will tell you why, and also tell you how to fix some of the problems that voters may have with EVMs.The first and one of the most valueable assetts provided by EVMs is it's ability to provide ballots in different languages.A voter in which english isn't thier first language is less likely to go out and vote due to a fear of not understanding what they are voting for which is why a machine that provides ballots in an array of languages will most likely improve the number of voters.Paper ballots come in only 4 languages this is due to high printing cost with the EVM you save the printing cost and provide accessibility to ESOL voters.A second benefit to the EVMs is easy access to

I believe that the city should use EVMs. The world today is becoming more electronic because it's easier and faster to use. EVMs would be a great alternative to paper ballots because of three reasons. They are accurate, time effiecient, and user-friendly.

The United States of America should stick with old school paper ballots. On paper is safe, reliable, cheap, and cannot be tampered with. Protecting your votes should be top priority.

Now days, anything and everything can be hacked into. The person who wrote "Everyone Should Be Able to Vote" states that "EVMs are safe" and that they are not "...connected to the internet" but that still does not stop someone from hacking into the machines or putting a bug onto the machine while they are voting. Like the person who wrote "Electronic Voting Is a Bad Idea" states that in 2007 a "...malicious software can transfer EVM votes for one candidate to another without the voter noticing", and in 2014 "...dozens of voters reported that machines had incorrectly recorded their votes". If something like that happens, then all those people who voted will have to go back and vote again. Making it a hassel on everyone.

Everyone should be able to vote, this is true. The controversy between the best way to do so, is evident. Electronic Voting Machines, or EVMs, have been introduced within the past deacde. Although they have provided innovative strengths to the process of voting, EVMs, also have many weaknesses.

Voting is one of the single most important rights that an American citizen can take advantage of. However, the method of how a voter should cast their ballots has become a topic of controversy in recent years. For centuries, voting polls across the world have relied on simple paper ballots to reach a conclusive result; but, with the introduction of much more efficient electronic voting machines, or "EVMs", the question has risen... Which voting system is superior? In my opinion, EVMs are the superior method of casting a ballot and there are several reasons why I say so.

In recent years many people in America have been looking for a better and safer way to vote. Thanks to the electronic voting machines (EVMs) voting will become a much easier way to vote for the disable, people that speak different languages, and voters with security concerns.

There are a great deal of reforms and frustration due to the DRE machines because they are outdated and the government officials are not doing enough for the activist voters. The people in numerous states have taken legal action to either improve DRE machines or get rid of them. There are cases and lawsuits that were filed against states in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Arizona, New York, California, New Mexico and Colorado. (Boyle,M. Davis E., Flanagan J., and Steigleder S. 2016) The voters’ complaints are most likely because of the DRE method likelihood of failing to count thousands of votes. In 2006, The League of Women Voters fought to pass the problems that the voting machines (Boyle,M. Davis E., Flanagan J., and Steigleder S. 2016). They

There are many reasons why I think electronic voting is a good idea. Electronic voting can help people vote easier, their are many different launguages to choose from and electronic voting is safe for everyone.

In “A Better Ballot Box” by Rebecca Mercuri, she argues that, aside from preventing ballot box stuffing, the new electronic voting systems currently for sale “provide less accountability, poorer reliability, and greater opportunity for widespread fraud than those already in use.” She insists that “there must be a way to back track total s from actual ballots that come from (and must be independently verified by) legitimate voters voting no more than once. In turn, ballots must in no way identify or be traced back to the voter after it is cast. These constraints, many experts say, cannot be mutually satisfied by any fully automated system.”

This may allow voters who don’t believe in electronic equipment or aren’t used to using electronic equipment to take an alternative option. We can discuss how to get an e-voting system to appeal to people all we want, “evangelize” until we’re exhausted but I doubt that most of this would work on stubborn, one-sided people and more importantly, we shouldn’t force people to use something they feel uncomfortable with. Using the bank system as an example, you can withdraw money from an ATM or going to a teller. For example, my grandmother doesn’t use ATMs at all because she doesn’t feel comfortable interacting with electronic equipment. On the voting side, this may or may not be needed because some areas may overwhelmingly prefer paper ballots over electronic voting or vise versa, in this case the polls would have to accommodate.