The Procedural Matters, Roles Of A Paralegal, And Overall Impressions Of The Small Claims Court

On October 29th, 2015, I made the trip to small claims court at the Superior Court North County Division in Vista, California. The case I observed was a contract dispute between Michael Mendell and Ediga Narashima. The plaintiff (Mendell) was sueing the defendant (Narashima) for $4,000 over a breach of contract. Narashima had given Mendell the opportunity to build theatre system and a bookshelf for his home. They both came to an agreement that the total cost of this procedure would be $4,100. Mr. Mendell is a professor at APT College where he teaches telecommunications. Mendell claims that the full $4,100 was never paid to him. During the whole process of the build there was many setbacks and problems that arose. Mendell claimed that while he was working on this home theatre project, he missed out on work and money he could have obtained from his other job as a professor. That is the reason why he is sueing Narashima as well as the fact that Mendell claims Narashima did not pay him his final installment of $300 for the job. Ediga Narashima claims that the final installment was paid through a friend or third party named Mario Diaz. Mario was a friend of both the plaintiff and defendant. He had referred Mendell to Narashima for the job. Mendell counterclaims that he had never received the final installment from Mario. The big question is to whether Mario had payed the final installment to Mendell as they agreed in

The Plaintiff is claiming $35 million from the State of NSW, which is purported to be vicariously liable for the Land and Environment Court and Pain J [1]. This claim includes nullifying Pain J’s judgment [14], and it is accompanied by Motions to uphold Lloyd J’s dismissal and refund the Plaintiff’s filing fees [2].

be described. Jurisdictional requirements for this case as well as the reasons why it was heard at

The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s Americans with Disability Act claim. The plaintiff’s is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims.The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff new trial. The appellate court the district court’s ruling.

The motion for partial summary for the plaintiff was denied by the court and the objection was overruled without prejudice to raise the issue for consideration at trial.

3-Schubert, F. A. (2012). Introduction to law and the legal system. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning.

The courthouse that was attended was the Small Claims Court, in the Durham Region Courthouse at 150 Bond Street East. This court was attended on October 19, 2016, in courtroom 509. The case that was heard was Adam Rantis (Unrepresented) v. Naresh Kumar Ganeshan (represented by Rajan Mahavalirajan). This was a case involving faulty workmanship, The Plaintiff is suing because he hired an installer to put floor down on the main level of his home. Upon completion of the installation it was found that there were many errors with the floor. The homeowner did not notice any of this until after he had paid the installer. As soon as he noticed he contacted the installer and informed him of the condition of the work. The homeowner also called in a

When I was present, the plaintiff and defendant were each giving their precedent. The plaintiff’s representative talked James King sent a threatening letter to Judge Seel’s house. In which, he explained descriptive evidence on how King made “threats” to Judge Seel in his argument. James King, on the other hand, was a man with a lot of “problems”. He stated that he was not in the right state of mind when he made the threat to Judge Seel. Also

Whether the trial court erred in denying Ndeumeni’s motion for summary judgment for Kemogne’s claim of promissory fraud where the statute of frauds was not satisfied.

On Thursday November 17th, 2005 we attempted to go and see a trial at the Oakland County Circuit Court. An attorney friend advised us to go to the Macomb Circuit Court that Thursday, but due to a scheduling conflict we chose to go the Oakland County Court. We were also advised to go around 1:00 p.m. because the court would commence again after lunch. We arrived to the court at 12:45 and after passing through security we quickly went to the fifth floor courtrooms to find a trial. Upon reaching the fifth floor we found that on that particular Thursday there were several pre-trials being held instead of a single trial.

On October 20th we visited the District Attorney’s office in downtown Thibodaux to get more of an in-depth look of both the civil and criminal legal system. Before we arrived, I had it in my mind that the main thing I wanted to get out of this trip was to hear the stories of those who would speak to us, as I personally find I learn best when told stories in tangent. When we first arrived at the D.A.’s office, we were greeted and lectured by Jennifer Richard and Joe Soignet, who are both assistant District Attorneys. Both of them were very knowledgeable when it came to explaining the ins and outs of the legal system.

The pre settlement loans is only one out of the two lawful financing alternatives accessible to a man who has recorded a case for asserting of harms in which a loan will be given as a sort of non-response credit, the measure of which will be resolved in light of the benefits and quality of the pending case. Despite the fact that the decision or settlement sum is not as large as what is already expected, the reimbursement sum, in whatever occurrence, will never surpass the offer of the harmed individual, as dictated by the court's decision.

The Superior Court has had Regional’s appeal fully briefed and under consideration since the end of July. They declined to ask for oral argument. We hope to hear from the Superior Court certainly in the first quarter of the year.

We stayed around for a while waiting on litigants to come until 9:30 am, no one had shown up, so the attorney told us we could go down to the courts and sit in on hearing from previvous cases. If any litigants came to the DASH center and needed

Paralegals and Legal Assistants do various tasks to support a lawyer or attorney including organizing files, conducting legal research, and drafting numerous types of documentation in preparation for legal action to take place. Legal actions that take place are court hearings, trials, and corporate meetings.