Introduction The process of human development as well as all the achievements that are made by men are closely linked to the aspect of creativity. In the past, a number of scholars have carried out research on creativity from a number of aspects like that of studying the 4P model. In most of there researches, a number of measures were used in differentiating those abilities that were termed as high and low (Lin, et al., 2012). Additionally, in finding the potential that people have regarding their creativity, most of the scholars have applied the psychometric approach while applying the cognitive approach in the process of developing solutions to a number of creative problems that are identified in the society. In their previous studies, scholars have found that there are a total of two creativity measures that tends to involve two different processes that are usually correlated with varied cognitive factors. Additionally, the performance of individuals based on the two developed measures have found not to be correlated in anyway (Lin, et al., 2012). As such, the hypothesis of this study will be to find out how personality traits and gender correlate differently with the divergent type of thinking and creative problem-solving abilities in accordance with the dual-process theory account creativity. Description of the participants To get the results of the study, a total of 320 undergraduate students was chosen from five different universities in the republic of Taiwan. Of
The mental process is the performance of some composite cognitive activity; an operation that affects mental contents; “the process of thinking”, the cognitive operation of remembering (Farlex, 2008). The mental mindset includes four styles of creative intelligence: Intuitive, Innovative, Imaginative and Inspirational. This paper will compare and contrast the four styles of creative intelligence and their influences on organizational decision making, include examples of how mental models/mind sets might limit the decision making process and explain how these models influence my decision making in the workplace.
Theories of creativity are vast. Several psychological theories on the process of creativity are chronicled. Some theorists explain creativity as intrinsic creative motivations, which individuals create a project for the sake of creating (Wibell, 2011). Other theorists convey the brain controls levels of creativity, and mental illness has an impact on creative process. Further, many believe the humanistic theory of creativity spawns the creative process. Through self-actualization creativity comes in peak experiences. The quality of the work depends on what is measured. The quality of the creative work depicts the message of the writing. The message can be
1. What are the three basic dimensions of human development according to the United Nations, and what is one example of a statistic that offers insight into each of these three dimensions?
In the context of creativity’s stated definition, we will proceed to group our arguments into three themes of factors: cognitive ability, expertise training, and environmental conditions. The human brain is highly adaptable and can continue to develop new cognitive abilities, even past adulthood (Norman, 2015). Proper cognitive expertise and training can help workers produce and operate in ingenious ways (Ginamarie, Lertiz & Mumford, 2004). Finally, the working environment can both motivate or stifle creative output. Managers can influence all three components: expertise, thinking skills, and motivation (Amabile, 1998).
S. I. Hayakawa wrote and published an article named "What lt Means to Be Creative". This article challenged how a creative person could be defined and identified. In Hayakawa’s essay he presents several points of view an individual could be characterized as being creative. His writing forces you to contemplate on how a person’s aptitudes are categorized. Hayakawa tests your ability to be opened minded and makes you visualize how a person could be described as a creative individual but may discredited themselves due to society’s standard of this word. After reading his writing, I believe I can summarize his analogy.
In this essay I will explore the correlation between intelligence (IQ) and creativity (DT), and whether one is influenced or can be predicted by the existence of the other. The relationship between IQ (intelligence quotient) and creativity has been an anchor point for psychological research. Numerous amounts of psychologists have carried out research in order to find evidence to support this idea of a correlation or evidence to disprove the hypothesis that IQ and creativity could be related.
Paulus & Nijstad (2003) defined creativity as “the development of original ideas that are useful or influential”(p.3). That is to say,
According to Baird and colleagues, mind wandering can enhance creativity goals and problems that were encountered. Creativity finds solutions that are novel, and high quality (Matlin, 2009). J.P. Guilford researched how we measure creativity. Creativity should be measured by divergent production. This research demonstrates the number of different responses that are made for each test item (Matlin, 2009).
Explain traits and characteristics of creative people and some important creative abilities: They tend to be more perceptive, and intuitive, have high self-confidence, independent, self-motivated, risk- takers, enthusiasm, humorous, playfulness, mysterious, curiosity etc…
It has not been until the late twentieth century that science began to look at creativity from a neurological standpoint, and evaluate its importance to human intelligence. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the use of MRIs to follow stimuli responses began to cultivate and hone research to target specific thought patterns. Dr. Arne Dietrich of the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences at the American University of Beirut published results from his experiments that show, “The new theoretical framework systematizes the interaction between knowledge and creative thinking …” by defining four different types of creativity and how each type connects to cognitive reasoning and the reasoning required to solve mathematical problems (Dietrich, 2004). In his doing so, Dr. Dietrich opened the doors for proven scientific connections between the fine arts, arts integration, education, knowledge, and career successes. Those without a strong “creativity streak” may be extremely knowledgable, but may also lack that “creative genius” that sets sensational and successful adults apart from the masses. Conversely, those adults that are seemingly bursting with ideas and innovations may lack the plethora of knowledge an expert would bring to the table. Just as there are both “experts” and “creative types," there exists a class of brain function wherein the three sections of the frontal
Jeff Dyer, Hal Gregersen, Clayton M. Christensen. p. cm. ISBN 978-1-4221-3481-8 (hardback) 1. Creative ability in business.
The conclusions derived from the researches help the argument that creativity requires both masculine and feminine components. Bem notes that “people with access to both masculine and feminine abilities or qualities also might have access to several strategies when confronted with various problems” (Jonsson and Carlsson, p. 273). The traditional masculinity is often associated with being rational, strong, and independent while the traditional femininity is associated with being emotional, sensuous, and imaginative. Combining those traits helps one to think of various strategies in a given problem. Runco articulates gender and strategies:
The purpose of this study was to measure the levels of creativity displayed by students and compare the findings to birth order. The subjects of the study were in a private school in Southwest Louisiana. Forty children aged 10-14 in grades 5-8 were studied. 22 of these students were female and 18 were male. The data was collected in three different types of ways. First data entry was “Eisenman's Personal Opinion Survey” (Boling, Boling and Eisenman, 2006), second data entry was based on the students’ ability to arrange and create polygons and finally students were given “The Alternative Uses Test of Creativity” (Boling, Boling and Eisenman, 2006). Students were then given a score based on eloquence and originality. A variable in this study is the gender of the participant. The researchers hypothesized that firstborn children would score
Creative intelligence is an innate characteristic with which we are born; this is an aspect in the development of our mental
There are three foundations of human development. The foundations are the biological development, psychological development, and social development. The concept of human diversity and cultural competences demonstrates how different people can be. General systems theory and social order are connected in some way.