The Process Of Updating Research And Cite-Checking

In writing a research paper, the hunt for creditable sources to use can be difficult. However, if one knows how to evaluate a source and deem it acceptable for college-level work, then it will make it easier to find sources to use. Many professors will reject sources if they are not academically acceptable, like advertisement websites and celebrity magazines, so it is important to look for sources produced by professional. Also, check the professional’s credentials, degrees, and knowledge. To determine if a source is creditable one must evaluate a source using a certain set of guidelines, in doing so a student can become good at sorting out the acceptable from the unacceptable. In evaluating a source, one needs to have three things for a general evaluation, which is author qualifications, accessibility to the source, and the information that is going to help one from it.

For legal information, use a source that is reliable for legal information, such as an article in a law review.

It’s useful to identify and agree on a particular source of information to use when researching, as a standardised method means more uniform work.

3)KeyCite, a citation checking service, which allows to determine whether cases or statutes are still good law.

I used to Google to find my sources and the process was that I went through each

In law research, according to Yell (2016), “Primary sources are actual statements of the law” (p.14). Yell also mentions the three categories of primary sources; “laws or statues created by either federal or state legislatures and signed in to the law, regulations promulgated by administrative agencies to implement the statues, and judicial decisions the interpret that statutes and regulations” (p. 14).

You are in a California Court of Appeal. You cite a California Supreme Court case. Opposing counsel cites a Ninth Circuit decision that interprets Oregon law. Both are on point. Is either authority binding? Which authority has greater weight?

Scholarly sources are important to support my viewpoints because it helps supports the credibility of my work. They are authors that verify ideas and provide the most accurate information for my paper to gain quality. When using Scholarly sources it makes your work about facts and not opinions. It makes the foundation that you used for research much

This gives the bibliography a wide range of different perspectives and skill sets. Also the different types of sources are good to get the better

After, come secondary sources, these you need look through more to make sure they are valid and see between any bias there may be. Secondary sources are textbooks, editorials, and journal articles. These can be hard to consider accurate because there is usually some amount of bias within evidence. For example, a textbook for a catholic school on religion, even though it contains scholarly documentation, it may not include and adjust specific evidence that may go against the religion. As well, a journal article from a conservative site will not necessarily shed positive light on any democratic view. These sources can be used but only if it is capable to differ between bias and facts.

I will use this Amici Curiae brief within my analysis and as supporting evidence. Since it is a Supreme Court filing, I will probably use it mostly for its legal analysis.

What are the elements of the legal citation Lugenbuhl v. Dowling (i.e.- plaintiff, defendant, court, location of case etc.)

By that same token, it is also important to look not just at how it is packaged, but how that packaging affects the reasoning held within. One need only look at the history of court reference questions to see this. Before the 1967 Truscott Referense Question, all reference questions were delivered in the seriatim style,

Melbourne University Law Review Association, Melbourne Journal of International Law; Australian Guide to Legal Citation, 3rd Ed. (2010)

Textual evidence provides the backbone of your paper, without it you could be thought untrustworthy. Others could think that you just made up your information. When using textual evidence, you always need to properly cite. This gives credit to whoever you learned the information from, and I believe also gives you a level of intellect. If another