The Production Of Anti Oxidant Muscadine Grapes

In this scenario Toro sells “Ride-Along” mowers that cost $500 each at wholesale. Johnson Hardware Co. called Toro to place an order over the phone for “100 Ride-Along mowers” which were to be delivered a week after the telephone order was placed. A week lapsed and when there was no delivery of the 100 “Ride-Along” mowers; Johnson Hardware Co. calls Toro only to find out that Toro says they do not have a contract to deliver 100 mowers.

"In California, the elements for a viable contract are 1) parties capable of contracting; 2) their consent; 3) a lawful object; and 4) sufficient cause or consideration." In regards to a minor 's capacity to contract, a minor is capable of contracting unless specifically prohibited. However, Section 6710 of the California Family Code states that "except as otherwise provided by statute, a contract of a minor may be disaffirmed by the minor before majority or within a reasonable time afterwards."

Company A started renovating the store on Main Street in My Town, U. S. A. for Grocery, Inc. However, Company A business increased beyond anticipation. Therefore, to meet its obligation to Grocery, Inc. to oblige renovation within six months, the company sub-contracts to Company B. Unfortunately, Company B had a reputation of poor work performance.

* Minors are defined as individuals under the age of majority to contract. This is the age at which a person is entitled to the management of his/her own estate (18 in most states).

In this case, there are several important issues to note. The initial issues is that a contract was signed by a minor acting on behalf of the company and not by a specified owner of the company. The question here is if this contract is legally binding and what recourse of actions the parties may have. The first step would be to consider the legality of the contract. In order for a contract to be legal it has to possess several important criteria. Contracts have to be communicated to the parties it effects clearly. (Kubasek 2015). In this case, the contract was not communicated at all to the owners of Muscadine grapes and it was also not

Since the contract was meant to be signed by the son, instead of the owner, it was also created to take advantage of the business in secret. As well as the attorney presenting the issue of the contract being signed by a minor, the argument that the son was not the sole business owner could be disputed. Because of the late payments by Don the attorney could possibly use Don’s irresponsibility to help the contract to be eliminated. By going through arbitration this issue could be easily resolved. It would also help the contract decision be a win-win situation. This could possibly encourage Don to restructure the contract and create a more fair and legal business solution. With both sides overcoming their issues this could leave a better separate between both companies.

16. In most states, where a minor wants to disaffirm a contract, but there is damage to the consideration he or she received, the minor:

First of all, the contract was made voluntarily because the shop was busy on that day and asked help from next store. Prior to making a contract, the voluntarily party needs to know basic knowledge or do some research on that retailer, but due to short period of time, there was no time to do that. According to the text book, they have made unilateral mistake only the retailer knows the agreement of contract based on his/her

During my research of contract law I discovered a publication that highlighted all the legal aspects of binding legal contracts. There are several reasons that I judge may rule a contract unenforceable, one of which relates to nondisclosure due to lack of capacity, this immediately required more study. According to the publication “It's expected that both (or all) parties to a contract have the ability to understand exactly what it is they are agreeing to. If it appears that one side did not have this reasoning capacity, the contract may be held unenforceable against that person. The issue of capacity to contract usually comes up when one side of the agreement is too young or does not have the mental wherewithal to completely understand the agreement and its implications” (Stim 2000). I knew that Mrs. Doe would try to use her son’s age as a reason not to honor the contract. I personally believe that if Mrs. Doe actually had

A person who is considered to have a mental or physical defect cannot enter into a legally binding contract. Age is also a contract limitation. This means that someone under the age of 18 is considered a minor and, therefore, cannot enter into a contract unless it is voidable. However, only the minor can void the contract, not the adult who entered into the contract. When a minor shows intent to rescind a contract by either words or action, the whole contract is voided. If a person is emancipated, they have legal control of themselves and can enter into a contract. In this case, Sam is of age to sign a contract agreement with the store; this is a valid element. The fourth element of the legal object will be deemed to exist if the object of an agreement is valid. Sam agreed to ship 1,000 units of his barking device. However, Sam was doing this illegally because he did not have the required license to conduct business from his apartment. This is not a valid

Similar to most cases that are brought through the judicial system, the circumstances of Marshall Petersen and the Muscadine grapes are complex and convoluted. One must not evaluate this matter solely based on what is ethically right or wrong. Rather, legal precedent must be evaluated to explore previous outcomes and the facts surrounding such results. Research begins with classic contract dispute concepts and further navigates based on the applicability of lesser known cases. The facts will guide all analysis of this contract dispute, leading to a decision based on an educated interpretation of the law.

Most people have the capacity to enter a valid contract, however, minors, people with mental disabilities, drunks, convicts, and elderly are not of capable mind to enter into such an agreement. Finally, the fourth element of legal object would be deemed to exist if the elements in the contract are not violating any legal state or federal statutes. The parties need to enter the contract under their free will and have full understanding of what each party is doing. Contracts may be voided by the legal system if they are harmful to society or are for unethical and illegal purposes. If the elements of a contract did exist between these parties, there could still be some possible reasons why a contract might not be valid based on facts not present in the scenario. For example, if Sam were a minor at the time he made the agreement with the chain store, the contract would not be valid because any contract entered with a minor, under the age of 18, can be voidable by law. I believe that a valid contract does not exist between Sam and the chain store. In the agreement Sam tells him he will deliver 1000 units of his invention, yet it does not state what he will get in

According to the case, both Cooper and his mother signed the contract that states they are responsible for the all risks that may occur. Therefore, sue against the Aspen Valley Ski Club could be enforceable, if only Cooper signed the contract due to his ability to disaffirm (the age of minority). However, when parents involved to the decision making, contract may lose protection against improvident decision of minority.

Mantis is not hiring an attorney to file a lawsuit for $3,340. They are going to threaten all they can to intimidate you to pay the full balance. Also, your mom doesn't have the power to send any amount for the business, so it doesn't matter what your mom promised to send. The contract is with the business and Mantis. On a side note, I don't have a copy of your agreement with Mantis. I'm not sure what they're presumably entitled to. But I don't think it would be beneficial to return daily

Marshall received a signature on a contract from a seventeen year old minor in which he hopes to enforce. From a legal standpoint, minors have a limited ability to enter into contracts. The seventeen year old minor employee can void the contract he signed at any time. Minors have the option to do this because of laws made to protect them