The Profile Of Laura Ashley Plc

In 2009 the company ratio was 1.02 and climbed up to 1.03. This means that the company will take up their profits in future of which is a good sign.

As of February 17, 2017 at 4:29 PM EST the price of a stock was 45.12 US Dollars with a 2.28% drop of price. Then P/E Ratio is currently at 18.54 and with current Earnings per Share value of .411. The first issue is that the stock price has been dropping since 2014 and kept falling. In 2014, the price of stock was at 72.53

The firm shows positive health for the Shareholders Equity with an equity ratio of 44.2% in 2011 and increasing to 45.2% in 2012. Calculating the percent of total assets that shareholders would receive in the event of company liquidation looks positive and very healthy for any investors or shareholders of this firm. The interest coverage ratio is also at a value that is significantly positive 14.0% in 2011 and 12.8% in 2012. Although 2021 shows a decrease, the company is still very capable of generating sufficient revenues to cover their interest payments on any debt they have incurred.

The second reason would be due to the ratio of rate of return on total assets, for the current year 2011 the company has a ratio of 6.1% and this is a low rate of return ratio because the company's net income declined by 79.20% compared to the previous year 2010. This also indicates the company is fragile because it measures how the company is using its assets to generate revenue.

Valuation Estimates: Actual Price (6/1/07): $21.63 Trailing P/E $9.57 Forward P/E $7.80 PEG $2.92 P/B $54.00 P/EBITDA $28.24 P/FCF $123.39 EV/EBITDA $3.54 Intrinsic Valuations Discounted Dividend Free Cash Residual Income LR ROE AEG Actual $18.40 $29.71 $3.22 $7.21 $8.79

When combining the figures for ROE, ROA and the DuPont analysis it appears that the company is using leverage favourably. ROE is greater than ROA and assets are greater than equity. This is a positive sign for shareholders as it suggests a good investment return in a company that is managing its shareholder equity well (Evans & McDowell, 2009).

As an investor, I am beginning to wonder if this company is a good investment or if it is too risky.

They also have the highest earnings per share at $4.97 and this help stimulate the company’s growth because more people will want to invest in the company. They have the highest debt to equity ratio at 325% and this means they are the riskiest investment out of the three because they borrow

Heather Evans is a smart, hard-working individual with a great business sense, and she has a keen understanding of the fashion industry from working as a model and as an assistant to the president of a woman’s clothing company. Combining these talents, Heather Evans was able to spot an underserved market estimated at $5 billion annually with significant growth prospects. Subsequently, Heather Evans is hoping to raise enough capital to launch a line of clothing to serve the 4.3 million women in a professional environments who would be primes candidates for a fashion label that is both functional and stylish.

The company currently has a current ratio of 14:1. This is bad because the company is not managing its assets properly.

I started out by reading yahoo financial to find any info that would help me out to find out if it would be a good investment at this time. The first thing that stood out was that it had a beta of 1.44362 as of the time this was written. That tells me that this is a stable stock almost near the Market. With a Market capital 585.95 billion shows that they have built a strong stock that most investors would easily consider. They have shown that prior to 2001 they have really made a stable comeback. They really have shown strong earnings to go with lots of institutional investing. They

Founded in 1999, sisters Cathy, Linda, and Valerie Montgomery developed Artisans Shirtcraft. The company’s focus is on manufacturing original hand-painted designed shirts. The company started off as a hobby, however as word-of-mouth spread, the company soon grew into a corporation in 2003 with sales from upscale boutiques and department stores. In 2004, the Montgomery sisters organized their company into three areas: Cathy oversaw purchasing at the lowest price possible, Linda supervised the art work, and Valerie was in charge of the business administration. Each department did not keep separate financial records. Due to a failing economy, the creditors for Artisan Shirtcraft no longer wanted to invest in the company due to their lack of financial controls and strategies that relied on bargain purchasing of shirts. In order for the company to have financial backers, Shirtcraft must demonstrate and establish company

The trade-off theory of capital structure refers to the suggestion that a business chooses the

The long-term liquidity risk ratio such as LT debt/Equity, D/E, and Total Liabilities to Total Assets all show a decline from year 2005 due to the repayment of debts. The interest coverage ratio also shows a healthy number of 29.45 in comparison to the industrial average of 15.04 indicating a high ability to pay out its interest expense. Such a low relative risk is not surprising due to the nature of its business depending heavily in R&D development and large intangible assets.

Company G’s debt equity ratio is low, so it’s a sign that they don’t take high risk. High risk can lead to better rewards.