The Pros And Cons Of A Charismatic Leader

Joseph Stalin used his intellect, and power, to outmanoeuvre his rivals to become leader of the Soviet Union. Using carefully planned propaganda including, painting, statues, and a series of cultivated posters Stalin immortalised and glorified his leadership. These state-manufactured images created a ‘cult of personality' around him, subsequently, creating an image of a heroic worshipped figure, who was associated with every aspect of soviet society. Stalin controlled the media and according to the historian Moshe Lewin, Stalin single handily, ‘become the system,’ (Lewin in Pittaway, 2008, p.137.)

This is called the Halo-Effect. We can take the example of the 1961 uS presidential debate. People who listen to the debate on the radio thought that candidate to recharge Nixon would lean but people watch the debate on television clearly believed that John F. Kennedy would be the wiener. They were in their right. John Kennedy and up taking the White House. As we all know John Kennedy was a good-looking man, who had that x-factor that made him lovable and trustworthy. That's very charisma. You need to have that plus if you want to be a charismatic leader. Charisma and political communication is essential. As mentioned earlier coma and according to its etymology call mom charisma is a gift with defined origins. Nature lease, it means being a blessed by the gods.nevertheless Kumar from the end of the 19 century in on wards coma this word was received in the political sphere when we wanted to explain the rise of political leaders and mostly when trying to explain the power politicians or leader could have on a specific group. In politics it's called the reason that is used as a seduction tool.a charismatic leaders is usually a skilled orator, admired and idolized by a large number of a given group. Charismatic leaders embodied confidence intelligence through their voice, their intelligence, their body language and even the way they dress. For example, when learning for office, as it was shown in the

Firstly, the USSR had already begun practicing Communism long before Stalin secured the post as the USSR’s absolute ruler (McAleavy, 2002). On top of that, Communism permitted the existence of only one political party (Dagger, 2014). This denotes that Stalin’s sole source of competition aroused from his own political party, the Communist Party (Waugh, 2001). Hitler, in contrast, faced stiff competition from different political parties during the 1920s (Waugh, 2001). The Great Depression and President Hindenburg’s complacency would consequently provide Hitler with a breakthrough (Waugh, 2001). The consolidation of power was complete when Hitler received enough national backing to pass the Enabling Act (Trueman, 2015a). This result a favor for Hitler in the political regime. Secondly, the affluent in Nazi Germany could manipulate political reforms for their role in providing the Nazis with finance (Waugh, 2001). Stalin on the other hand does not face such dilemmas as communism results in the division of wealth which would consequently prevent anyone from having the financial power to contest the state’s decisions (Waugh, 2001). Finally, Stalin prefers being addressed as ‘Uncle Joe’, as he believes that this title promotes the brotherhood shared by communists, whereas Hitler tends to get flattered when addressed as ‘Führer’ (Waugh,

Joseph Stalin, from the time that he was a low level revolutionary to the years that he spent as the dictator of the Soviet Union, always knew what he needed to do to achieve his goals. His organized rise to power allowed him to gain a steady flow of followers who would support him for decades to come. Stalin received a minor government position in 1917, but by the time a new leader was needed in 1924, he “had turned the largely routine post of Party general secretary into the most powerful office in the Soviet Union” (“Joseph Stalin) and “had built a personal empire for himself through his control over committee appointments at all levels . . . expand[ing] the leading Party organs with his supporters, who then voted against his rivals”

Charisma is just a trait and means to have a vibrant persona. The difference between a charismatic leader and a normal leader is that a charismatic leader is more charming and is usually more persuasive than a regular leader.

Thus, the “Cult of Personality” was flourishing. Propaganda glorifying Stalin and Soviet ideals brainwashed the minds of Russian people. Stalin successfully impressed his socialist philosophies on millions of workers and peasants. Over time, socialism transformed into Stalinism, and it took hold. Stalin was able to hypnotize people towards one belief, the love of Stalin. When they saw Stalin being portrayed heroically everyday in the news or on posters, they began to idolize him. Stalin is like Big Brother; he was the main focus and had total power over the people and their actions.

Joseph Stalin built up this love with the "Cult of Personality". He was glorified with giant statues and monuments. Stalin appeared daily on the cover of Soviet newspapers; he was in every facet of Soviet life. Daily visual imagery of Stalin portrayed him as a Georgian peasant, which emphasized socialist principles of power from the people. In addition, people called him “father and teacher of the peoples” (Runyan 66) and a deity, because he replaced the Czar and the Church. These daily images were engraved in the minds of the people. Thus, the “Cult of Personality” was flourishing. Propaganda glorifying Stalin and Soviet ideals brainwashed the minds of Russian people. Stalin successfully impressed his socialist philosophies on millions of workers and peasants. Over time, socialism transformed into Stalinism, and it took hold. Stalin was able to hypnotize people towards one belief, the love of Stalin. A simple cause and effect: they saw imagery of Stalin portrayed heroically everyday in the news or on posters and they began to idolize him. Stalin is like Big Brother; he was the focus and with the love and loyalty of his people, he had total power over them and their actions.

When a nation is in a desperate time in history, a leader always rises to power to bring out new ideas for the people to hear and take on. Josef Stalin, for example is a leader that rose to power and held it for almost 30 years in the Soviet Union. Similar to his enemy, Stalin’s actions are oftenly compared to with ones of Hitler. By gaining popularity from the majority, Stalin promised to make Russia great again and turning it into a powerful nation. However, what he did is now reflected as being a totalitarian dictator and abusing his power for his benefit. Nonetheless Stalin was able to use his cleverness to rise in power and deal with conflict to accomplish what he desired.

“The man who turned the Soviet Union from a backward country into a world superpower at unimaginable human cost (Joseph Stalin).” “Stalin was born into a dysfunctional family in a poor village in Georgia (Joseph Stalin).” Permanently scarred from a childhood bout with smallpox and having a mildly deformed arm, Stalin always felt unfairly treated by life, and thus developed a strong, romanticized desire for greatness and respect, combined with a shrewd streak of calculating cold-heartedness towards those who had maligned him. “He always felt a sense of inferiority before educated intellectuals, and particularly distrusted them (Joseph Stalin).”

All effective leaders, past and present, must have charisma in order to accomplish anything. Charisma - defined by Merriam Webster’s Dictionary as “special magnetic charm or appeal” - is one of the biggest reasons why Adolf Hitler was able to convince an entire country that the genocide of an entire nation of innocent people was what Germany needed in order to cleanse

In Russia societies are split into Stalinists and anti-Stalinists. But is outdated now. According to sociologists the majority of Russians represented in 60 percent , have two apparent mismatching images of Stalin: a cruel dictator who killed or caused the death of millions of people and a wise statesman who led the Soviet Union to prosperity and richness. The perception

As an area studied by humans about humans, there are realms of the human psyche not yet deciphered by political theorists, but can be explained by various sociological phenomena. Most significantly, the indiscretion of the human condition most easily manipulated is that of the perception of capable authority. The candidate that wins any presidential election is the one that the majority of voters could identify with and trust, deduced from the advertisement of the individual’s values. This inclination is identified during election time, and so emerges the mass phenomenon of charismatic authority. Max Weber outlined charismatic authority as "resting on devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism, or exemplary character of an individual person,

A charismatic leader is capable of empowering a crowd with the use of confidence and motivation.

Before Superman, there was another man, known as “Man of Steel”. Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, quite possibly on the most controversial characters in the history of humankind, reigned over the Soviet Union during the age of the Second World War. Stalin is responsible for saving his country, the deaths of millions, including his own people, a massive role in defeating the Nazis, and exercising social engineering in a way the world before had never quite witnessed. Stalin, good or evil, was one of the most interesting characters of all time.

Joseph Stalin was a cunning and adroit politician and a stalwart leader for the Soviet Union.