The Pros And Cons Of Abortion

There are two main political parties you can choose from in the United States, The Democrats and the Republicans. There are also third parties you can choose from. People can choose to be part of any party. We are divided by the left and right side on the political spectrum. The right are more conservative and the left are more liberal. These two political parties show philosophical differences through their viewpoints on major topics. With so many differences between the parties, finding topics or issues upon which constituents agree on can be difficult.

“How can the “Dream” survive if we murder children? Every aborted baby is like a slave in the womb of his or her mother. The mother decides his or her fate” (Martin Luther King, Jr). This quote, by Martin Luther King Jr, represents how Martin Luther King Jr really feels about abortions, and how abortions relate back to the idea of slavery. As abortions are spreading all across the world many people have wondered if there are any positives to abortions? If there are not any positives to abortion then people may wonder, what are the negatives to abortions, and how do other people feel about abortions.

Before the 1973 ruling of the case of Roe v Wade, the estimated average number of illegal abortions every year ranged from 200,000 to 1.5 million. The methods used were violently dangerous including women ingesting toxic substances such as bleach and detergents which often times was ineffective. Women around the country were concerned that the anti-abortion laws conflicted with a person’s right to privacy and equal protection given by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. Gale University’s William Sullivan explains ”The right to abort unborn children is not specifically protected by the Constitution, and prior to 1973, abortion legislation had been understood to be limited to the power of the states per the Tenth

Regardless of the opinions surrounding abortion, a majority of people are familiar with the Supreme court cases of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. These two cases have played a tremendous role in regard to the abortion debate. In 1973, the Roe v. Wade case was ruled in favour of Roe and stated the stringent criminalization of abortion in Texas was deemed unconstitutional under the fourteenth amendment. The law violated the right of privacy, which implied the privacy of a woman’s decision to an abortion. Although the courts agreed with Roe, they also recognized the rights to an abortion are not absolute. Limitations to the right was based on the trimesters of pregnancy with the first trimester protecting the woman’s choice and the third trimester being acceptable for states to regulate or even ban abortions outside of therapeutic reasons.

At the present time, abortion is legal in the United States. The 1973 Roe v. Wade case was the landmark United States Supreme Court decision that documented abortion as a constitutional right, overturning individual states’ laws not in favor of abortion. In the case of Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a woman’s right to an abortion falls within the right of privacy. The Fourteenth and Ninth Amendment clearly stated these rights in the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.” The Ninth Amendment states, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be

In Roe v. Wade, in 1973, the Supreme Court held a case that a pregnant woman has the full privacy right to have an abortion. The right to abortion is not guaranteed and must be stable against the State’s countervailing benefits in keeping the health of the woman and in protecting the life of the unborn child. The State’s belief in protecting the health of the woman becomes definite, therefore greatly enough to support state ruling of abortion under the strict scrutiny standard of judicial review; after the first trimester, which is the stage of pregnancy when abortion becomes dangerous to the mother carrying the child to term. The State’s concern in protecting the life of the unborn child becomes irresistible, after possibility, the stage of pregnancy when the unborn child is capable of independent life. Because neither interest is irresistible before the second trimester, the State may not regulate abortion in the first trimester either to reserve the woman’s health or to protect the life of the unborn child. After the first trimester the State may control the act of an abortion, but only for the purpose of protecting the woman’s health, not for the purpose of protecting the life of the unborn child. After viability, the State may regulate, and even forbid, abortion to protect the life of the unborn child, except when the act of abortion is needed to

It is not legal for a state to deny the people personal, marital, family, and sexual right to privacy. No case in history has the court declared that a fetus, which is an infant developing in the womb, is a person. Therefore, a fetus does not have any legal “right to life”. Roe argued the Texas law is unconstitutional and should be overturned.” In Roe’s argument the issue being appealed would be that she, the plaintiff has the right to obtain an abortion whether the pregnancy is life threatening to the mother or not. An abortion is solely the mothers decision and the child is unborn therefore has no rights and need not be protected by the States or Constitutional law(Roe v Wade,

One of the strongest arguments for abortion is the government has no right to interfere with a woman’s reproductive health decisions. The United States is not ruled by God, and the constitution is a non-religious document which affords us a right to privacy. The Supreme Court agreed with this argument as evident by their decision in the Roe vs. Wade case of 1973. Seven Supreme Court justices ruled in favor of Roe while two dissented. Blackmun, one of the justices in favor, based his decision on three arguments: First, abortion laws were originally intended to protect the mother, not the fetus. Second, abortion procedures were improved and safer. Finally, the fetus had not been granted legal status as a person. The following excerpt is from “Roe vs Wade: Abortion and a Woman’s Right to Privacy” by Melissa Higgins. “Regarding the Fourteenth Amendment, Texas’s abortion law violated the due process clause, which protects a person’s right to privacy from state action. This included a woman’s right to end her pregnancy. On this point, Blackmun wrote,

Abortion is a subject that numerous people have strong opinions about; some believe that it is a form of murder and should be banned, yet others believe that the decision should be for the woman herself to make. In my eyes, the choice to abort or not abort is the woman’s, not the public’s. However, many men disagree with pro-choice.

In 1973, the US Supreme Court declared abortion a nationwide fundamental right through a trial called Roe vs. Wade and protected this right underneath the Fourteenth Amendment, more specifically, the right to privacy. A basic human right, especially one outlined by the Supreme Court, must never run at risk or threat chiefly because not everyone agrees with it. Under no circumstances should a pregnancy ever adjudge mandatory. Abortion is a Constitutional right and as a nation we must fight to give the right and freedom of safe abortions to women all around the nation, make birth control and sex education accessible to women, and raise awareness about the topic itself. (LawCornell)

The Griswold v. Connecticut is greatly remarkable and struck controversy in the hearts of many. Thus, in relation to the Griswold v. Connecticut case is yet another controversial case decided seven years later, Roe v. Wade (1973). This case serves as a landmark case involving the issue of privacy under the due process clause, however consisted of moderately different facts compared to the Griswold v. Connecticut case, in that a pregnant woman brought to Court, in the state of Texas, the proscribing dispute to terminate a pregnancy, which under Texas law abortion subsisted as a criminal statute. The rather surprising aspect of this case was the Courts ruled it as constitutional. The Supreme Court ruled, in a 7-2 vote, that the rights of a woman to decide whether or not to become a mother is a right to privacy, which is protected under the Fourteenth Amendment. Individual freedom is crucial in this case in that a mother should have the decision to abort a pregnancy. In the majority opinion, provided by Justice

Wade. According to the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, “The Roe v. Wade case was decided on in 1973 by the U.S. Supreme Court. This decision legalized abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. It was created from two different cases. hat of an unmarried woman from Texas, where abortion was illegal unless the mother's life was at risk, and that of a poor, married mother of three from Georgia, where state law required permission for an abortion from a panel of doctors and hospital officials. While establishing the right to an abortion, this decision gave states the right to intervene in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy to protect the woman and the potential life of the unborn child” ("Roe V. Wade"). According to CNN Library, “The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy (recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut) protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision gave a woman a right to abortion during the entirety of the pregnancy and defined different levels of state interest for regulating abortion in the second and third trimesters. The ruling affected laws in 46 states” ("Roe v. Wade Fast Facts - CNN.com"). There were also several other court cases about abortion that followed the Roe v. Wade case.

Wade. This made abortion legal, and the fact it was illegal was deemed unconstitutional. However, this has not stopped federal appellate courts from attempting to overturn the Supreme Court ruling. Now that Ohio has blatantly placed a very extreme restriction on abortion, it has left many people wondering if this in fact is an event foreshadowing the future of abortion. It is known that Mr. Trump may attempt to overturn Roe v. Wade, however this would be a violation of one’s right to privacy. A person is guaranteed a private life free from government intrusion. Telling a woman she in fact cannot have an abortion even though the fetus is not deemed viable is in fact a violation of privacy. Roe v. Wade protects abortion as a right to privacy. The right to privacy was first established through a court case: Griswold v. Connecticut. This particular form of right to privacy is located in the fourteenth amendment. However, the right to privacy is also included in a handful of other amendments such as the fourth amendment. Overall, this bill in Ohio is in fact a violation of a woman's right to privacy. Whether Mr. Trump is president elect or not, states should not be invoking such strict rules on a woman's right to undergo an

In addition, the Roe v. Wade decision is a direct illustration of judicial activism. Prior to the Court’s ruling, many states limited or completely prohibited abortion. In a 7-2 decision, the Court ruled that Roe’s right to privacy permitted women to receive abortions given to them by in their First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments (Roe v. Wade). As stated, this case is an illustration of judicial activism because the Supreme Court Justices interpreted the law loosely, creating their own law that became the Supreme Law of the Land. The Court’s decision enables states to pass their own legislation concerning abortion. As noted in Justice Harry Blackmun’s majority opinion, “A State may properly assert important interests in safeguarding health, in maintaining medical standards, and in protecting potential life (“Key excerpts from the majority opinion”). The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, states, “Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws” (“The Heritage Guide to The Constitution”). However, when the Supreme Court ruled that women have the right to abortion as an extension of her right to privacy, they exhibited judicial activism. Justice Blackmun stated in his opinion a “The privacy right involved, therefore, cannot be said to be absolute….We, therefore include that the right of personal privacy includes the abortion

The fourteenth amendment of the constitution does not constitute the right of the federal government to determine laws regarding abortion. The fourteenth Amendment, passed in 1868, was invoked to protect freed slaves from persecution and unlawful imprisonment, and to ensure they enjoyed equality under the law. The amendment contains no reference to the act of abortion, rather, it ensures that no individual be denied liberty without due process