The Pros And Cons Of Animal Cloning

With the development of science, cloning has become possible. Some cloning has been used to help benefit the human race; in some ways the environment and other species. However, other cloning uses could cause many problems such as a disadvantage in intelligence, strength, and who would be acceptable to obtain what jobs.

First, cloning is a bad thing because most things that undergo cloning have many medical disorders and die an early death. On https://listontap.com/10-reasons-human -cloning-bad-society-large/ they gave marvelous examples why. It took exactly 277 eggs to make a clone of Dolly. That shows how little attempt at cloning fail. Another thing is Many cloned animals have under formed hearts lungs and other organs. That just goes to show how cloning animals is not very practical for the animals only live around half the lifespan of their breed of animal. Take Dolly's clone her clone died at, 6 years old, half of what sheep of her breed live. Over all cloning is mostly unsuccessful.

There are some people that have been very anxious with cloning because they believe it is something new, but in reality it was introduced in the 1950s. It started with cloning food and has moved onto cloning animals. It has been successful on many different cases and a famous one is the cloning of a sheep named Dolly. Dolly lived to be six and a half years old and she had six kids. People believe that cloning should be illegal but we believe that scientists should clone endangered or extinct species in order to preserve them, here’s why.

Animal cloning started without the world even knowing. First, an animal clone is “an exact physical copy of one ‘parent’” (Newman 12). “Animal cloning experiments began in the 1960’s. Frogs were the first subjects. By 1987 scientists had begun cloning cows and other mammals” (Newman 12). Dolly the sheep was the first big cloning success, credited to Ian Wilmut in 1996 (Praded 21). This sheep was a scientific breakthrough, but it also caused many people to question the intents of scientists. Many people wondered if scientists would clone humans next. The original intent of animal cloning was not for the food industry. The reason animal cloning started was to find a way to help cure currently untreatable diseases (“Why Do Scientists Clone?”). By cloning cells, scientists will be able to manipulate the cells to become something new.

The topic of cloning has brought much debate in science and also in society. Many

There are many arguments against cloning. Leon R. Kass bases his argument on repugnance in his article The Wisdom of Repugnance. He is a well-known physician, educator and scientist. Kass perceives cloning as offensive, grotesque revolting, repulsive and wrong. To establish his argument he states, “Most people recoil from the prospect of mass production or human being, with large clones of look-alikes, compromised in their individuality.”1 His rationale is cloning is unnatural, because it is asexual and requires only one parent. Kass believes that cloning turns natural procreation into a manufactured process, which is not natural or moral. In his essay he also points out that cloning will also change the way we see ourselves through our

Farmers are using different technology for breeding. They used selective breeding to produce animals that exhibit desirable traits and they get more benefit from it. For example, using breeding techniques farmers makes cows which produce more milk with less lactose, and sheep which produce more wool. Farmers accept this new selective breeding technology because in the past, farmers would use growth hormones to promote such qualities. This became problematic when residue of the hormones remained in the meat, leaving it with a foul taste. When researchers began to clone transgenic animals, it became possible to develop certain traits in animals, which increased the quality of their yield. When a farmer would like to raise the standards of a herd, the breeding process is very slow and sometimes incomes can decrease (Wilmut 23). Many times when relying on sexual breeding alone to mass-produce these animals, there are chances of breeding out the desired traits (Freudenrich). Transgenic animal cloning will result in higher quality meats and dairies without the use of artificial hormones. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration released in January 2008 concluded “edible products from normal, healthy clones or their progeny do not appear to pose increased food consumption risks relative to comparable products from conventional animals.” After 2008, US Food and Drug Administrative agree to use

The FDA says that it is just as safe to eat a cloned animal as it is to eat an animal that was conventionally bred. Cloning does not modify or manipulate an animals genetics or DNA, it is an exact copy of the animal. Then the cloned animal is used to help livestock breeders with the reproduction of their most productive livestock and create healthier offspring. Our society benefits from animal cloning because, it is

For instance, the before mentioned Scholastic Scope magazine said, “Companies that offer pet-cloning services say cloning is a way to honor a beloved animal and ease the grief of losing a pet.” Considering that the clone will be physically identical to the original pet, this could be considered true. Animals are like family members in most households, so the thought that such a cherished creature could be gone forever can be a lot of children to handle. Making cloning a great solution for heart broken children. Another interesting quote from Scholastic Scope magazine is, “Researchers use clones of mice, pigs, and other animals to study human diseases and search for cures.” The reason they need clones and can’t just use different organisms of the same species is, animals react differently to diseases so to test cures you need animals that will all react the same to the diseases they are helping to cure. This is a very important use of cloning and it is theorized that if we continue using cloning we will eventually have cures for Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and even heart disease. This is a critical point for the cloning side because if scientist were finally able to rid the world of such diseases it could help many, all over the world suffering from

An individual's life should not have the sole purpose of satisfying someone else's needs and desires. "The facts of science make clear that from the earliest stages of development, embryos (whether produced through normal reproduction or cloning) are distinct, living, and whole human beings. True, they have yet to grow and mature, but they are whole human beings nontheless" (Klusendorf, Scott) Even when identical twins are naturally created, the embryo splits spontaneously and gives the new embryo a new unique genetic combination. Keeping this in mind, I belive that it is a good thing that the government has interfered in advancements concerning human and animal cloning.

Animal cloning is a big controversy in modern media and in the medical field. Animal cloning benefits many people. Animal cloning is very interesting, you can clone your long lost family pet, you can resurrect extinct animals, and it offers medical breakthroughs. I think it should be practiced more and made more available to the public. Animal cloning has been proved successful on July 5,1996 the first animal was cloned. It was a female sheep named Dolly, so animal coning is an effective practice. There are 2 ways to clone animals, embryo cloning and nuclear transfer. Embryo cloning is where a tidbit of sperm is retracted from an animal and put into a petri dish with an egg from another animal , then fertilization occurs. Once the egg is

The first problem that human cloning encounter is it is one of unethical processes because it involves the alteration of the human genetic and human may be harmed, either during experimentation or by expectations after birth. “Cloning, like all science, must be used responsibly. Cloning human is not desirable. But cloning sheep has its uses.”, as quoted by Mary Seller, a member of the Church of England’s Board of Social Responsibility (Amy Logston, 1999). Meaning behind this word are showing us that cloning have both advantages and disadvantages. The concept of cloning is hurting many human sentiments and human believes. “Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality in the cloning of other mammals, we believe that cloning-to-produce-children would be extremely unsafe, and that attempts to produce a cloned child would be highly unethical”, as quoted by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Since human cloning deals with human life, it said to be unethical if people are willing to killed embryo or infant to produce a cloned human and advancing on it. The probability of this process is successful is also small because the technology that being used in this process is still new and risky.

While the possible risks of cloning or the medical breakthroughs cloning could lead to are not limited to personal interests, it is for the reason of familiarity of cloning as well as research. For the purpose of this research project, cloning is defined as, “a plant or animal that is grown from one cell of its parent and that has exactly the same genes as its parent” (Moraczewki). I will be primarily focused on the benefits as well as the health risks cloning poses when being performed. As someone related to someone in the scientific field, I am interested in finding whether or not cloning is more beneficial to our country than it is having a negative effect on our

Many ethical and moral dilemmas arise when discussing human cloning, and one can have many positions for and against each. To understand the issues surrounding human cloning, one must have a basic

There are also many negative aspects of cloning. To create different organs or limbs in order to help a person to live longer or more comfortably seems to go against nature. The way human life should be created is through sexual intercourse. Harmond Varmus, a schoolteacher, said it best; “Human cloning represents a grave attack on the dignity of conception and on the right an unrepeatable, unpredetermined set of genes.” To clone an animal is almost the same thing. We are playing with the way humans and animals have reproduced for years. Is it fair that we clone and then kill an animal just for its organs in order to save a person’s life? Scientists are not even sure that the animal’s organs will be compatible with the human body. According to the Medical Research