The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

To begin with, animals ' rights are abused when they are utilized as a part of research.  Animals and individuals are similar in numerous ways; they both feel, think, act on, and encounter torment. Therefore, animals should be treated with the same dignity as people. However animals ' rights are disregarded when they are utilized as a part of research since they are not given a decision. Animals are subjected to tests that are again and again agonizing or cause lasting harm or even death, and they are never given the alternative of not taking part in the experiment. Animals don 't freely give themselves up for the progression of

When discussing the issues faced from an ethical standpoint of animal rights it is important to consider the benefits animals bring to people and then question what rights animals are entitled to due to this (Fisher). Taking that into account, one must ask if giving them rights could possibly overstep on human rights and would animals even be able to enjoy rights (Fisher). It is often debated that the benefits and knowledge through experimentation of animals have led to life-saving advancements in the field of science and medicine (Fisher). The other side of the debate argues that even if these past benefits are justified, these type of experiments are no longer necessary and it is deemed unacceptable that wrongful treatment of animals is done for this purpose (Fisher). When it comes to the question of

With the genetic differences among humans and animals along with all of the harm that they have suffered through, other methods of research should be used. If organizations are worried about the costs so much then animal testing

Animals testing debate revolves around animal rights and moral status of human beings and animals. Animals are subjected to distress and affliction for the benefit of people. Human beings have a higher moral status and enjoy fundamental rights and privileges that animals lack, and, therefore, potential animal rights violations are outweighed by greater human benefits of animals testing.

Imagine an innocent little rabbit...who was taken to a dark lab... and had makeup viciously rubbed on their skin...burning like fire. Having their eyes clamped open with no way of freedom with irritating fluids rushing in the rabbit’s eyes blinding them. Why would people be okay with this tiny animal being tortured? Animal experimentation is wrong and cruel to animal species. Medical and cosmetic testing has been done for years and it has been a controversial issue for some time. Some people having been debating whether or not there should be animal testing for past years. As stated by Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley, animal experimentation has been used for beneficial research, but is not worth the lives and abuse of the animals. Sadly, the ProCon organization explains “how over 26 million animals are mistreated each year for both scientific and commercial purposes.” Continuing animal testing is like people smoking cigarettes. It is an issue that is just being ignored and has to be stopped. Animal testing should be banned because it cannot always be accurate, there are other options that can benefit research efficiently, and it can kill and torture animals.

More than 100 million animals are killed in United States laboratories every year. These animals include mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish and birds. Many companies and cosmetic brands still test on animals, even knowing the torture that comes with it. During this testing there are several different types of tests being ran on the animals, most are painful and cruel. There are many questions about animal testing, is it necessary? Is it humane? What happens during testing? What can one do to solve the problem?

The last issue about animal testing is that it is wasteful. 115 million animals are tested on globally, every single year (Cruelty Free International). Many of these animals lives are wasted because there are other more efficient alternative ways of testing, that don’t involve the animal’s lives. These ways of testing include; computer models, synthetic membranes, statistics, scanning technologies, human volunteers, and cell and tissue cultures (Earth, Down to). If scientists used these alternative kinds of testing before testing on animals, many lives would be saved. Also, there would be no need to breed all of these animals in the first place. Scientist are also wasting money. Buying the animals and their food is very expensive. If the

Over the years millions of animals are killed in laboratories, Including thousands of dogs- most Beagles. These beagles get confined for years or months, The dogs are usually kept in small cages or runs. Most of the time of their lives, Their being used for toxicology, the Beagles get fed lines of experimental drugs. They do this until the Beagle is dead from all the toxins it consumed, leading to a slow and painful death.

Animals are part of a branch of science typically found in biology. Animals are sometimes used for testing to observe different traits and their abilities. We test on animals, because of moral reasoning that humans should not be tested on. The reality is, why are animals being tested on? Animals are part of life like any other living organism. These organisms are a large reason we exist today as our main source of food, typically proteins. When we test on animals, we are unaware on how they are internally feeling. We can see their physical attributes such as shivering, whimpering, or crying. We do not test on humans, because we know how they will react. Humans don’t want to experiment on each other as we will feel like objects, but why do we make animals feel like objects? Everything we do for ourselves contradicts what we do to other living organisms, mainly involving animals. This is why animals’ rights is such an extensive debate relating to ethics. Animal rights are the justices belonging to animals to live freely from medical research, hunting, and other services to humans. Applying ethics and morals to the topic, animal rights should be extended and should be practiced on.

More than 100 million animals are killed in the United States annually for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven testing, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Animal testing in America has lasted for many years. It has long been viewed as a way to find cures for human diseases and test the safety of consumer products. However, animal testing is very costly and wastes time compared to other options. Many test subjects even die due to experiments. Human anatomy is also very different from animals’, so test results are not always accurate. Animal product testing should not be performed because it is more expensive and time consuming than other alternatives, ineffective as humans are not genetically parallel to test

Animal testing refers to procedures that take place in human clinical trials and it involves dosing, toxicity and efficiency of drugs. “ Humans beings have long used animals as test subjects for a variety of purposes.” (“Animal”) which violates the living rights of animals. Animals and people are alike in many ways, as close relatives we both feel, think , behave and experience pain therefore animals should be treated with the same value and respect as humans. Animal testing is inhumane and it contradicts the rights of life of an animal, thus animal testing should not be morally justified.

Human doing harmful things to animals by using them in the laboratory. Laboratory is not a place for animals to stay there. The animals that researcher used for testing are mice, pig, cat, dog, monkey, and others. They were suffering alive by human being. Think about what if animal treated us like the way we treated them, we will open our mind. Animal have feelings like us and they should treat with respect. Animals were used to develop anesthetics to prevent human pain and suffering during surgery. Yes, animal testing helps many human life, but can we save their lives using human? It is not fair for them to be use by human as we live on the same planet. Moreover, animal testing is harmful and painful for any kind of animal to endure. Yet, animal testing happened many years ago and until now. The animal lovers fight hard to prevent animal testing. Last couple years, the percentage of animal testing in the United Kingdom has decreased. Scientist used them for medical research and to study about it. Physician try testing the animal before touching any human being. Now a day, people have different beliefs about using the animals to test them. Some people will agree with testing animal, but some will disagree with it. Especially today generation, new technology were made so they try to use less animal testing. Instead of using living creature, we should use technologies to help us find out what we need to do. Therefore, animal testing should not be use in lab under any circumstances.

Animals, humans, alike are thinking breathing and emotional creatures that habit this beautiful Earth. Every year over 100 million animals die from animal testing and biological experiments (Peta.) Animals may not be able to reason or talk, but they can suffer. They feel pain and fear similarly to the way humans do, in fact their reactions to pain are almost identical. Therefore should not be taken advantage of or used as test dummies. The consequence of testing on animals for the greater good does not justify the morality of that action. If the consequence is killing innocent animals then the morality of that action is considered wrong. It’s unethical and inhumane to sentence a variety of living animals to a lifetime in a cage while causing loneliness, fear and pain.

What would you do if you were forced to live in filthy conditions, subjected to various tortures and horrifying ordeals? This is the life of an animal kept as a tool for scientific research. The debate over human animal testing has been ongoing for many years, starting as early as the 19th century. However, animal testing has been recorded as early as 500 BC, and has been practiced ever since. People have been advocating for more humane practices for animal testing since the 19th century, when Queen Victoria publicly displayed her disgust at these practices. Scientists should not continue animal testing because there are alternatives that are safer for the animals, the treatment of said animals has been shown to be inhumane, and the testing done on some of these animals does not even translate to humans.

After three dogs were forced to ingest a test substance every day for five days at Charles River Laboratories, they experienced labored breathing and a high heart rate. They became cold to the touch, were not able to be aroused and were seen with the test substance in their mouths and on their bodies. One dog died and the other two were euthanized one to two days later. (“Examples of Severe Animal Suffering in Laboratories”)