The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Although animal testing in the United States is regulated by the AWA, this act does not supervise experiments on animals; thus, many animals are abused. While acting as

“Given the climate of poor regulatory oversight, many animals are also abused, neglected, and harmed in ways that violate the law”( “Animal Testing and the Law” ) , revealing the horrific underlying effect of animal testing that society does not want to display to the public. Not to mention, many animals are unprotected by the law and forced against their will to undergo a horrid experience—“legal tests include burning, poisoning, mutilating…, and dissecting without painkillers”( “Animal Testing and the Law” ). Many animals are caged behind closed doors that the public cannot see because scientists who use these techniques do not want to upset the public; however, the law is not forcefully used to protect animals in a harmful environment. Furthermore, animals have no voice to establish a strong faith for their future; humans determine the fate and well-being of the animals. Animal Welfare Act, a Federal law that addresses the standard of care animals receive at research facilities, excludes about 95 percent of animals used in research and has low protection for the rest ( “ Animal Testing and the Law” ). Precious animals used in experimental research should be protected fully, if animals are going to be used, otherwise animal testing should be banned if the laws cannot fulfill their duty of protection because of the horrible experiments that may take place. “M.A. Fox

At this very moment, millions of animals are stuck inside cold, locked cages in laboratories across the country. They dwindle in pain, throb with loneliness, and yearn to roam free and use their own minds. Instead, all they do is lie and wait in despair for the next terrifying and agonizing operation that is to be performed on them. They shudder and wince in fear whenever someone walks past their cage. After surviving lives of pain, isolation, and horror, near to all of them will be killed. Although animal testing brings more products and more medical discoveries, it should still be considered an act of animal cruelty.

Imagine an innocent little rabbit...who was taken to a dark lab... and had makeup viciously rubbed on their skin...burning like fire. Having their eyes clamped open with no way of freedom with irritating fluids rushing in the rabbit’s eyes blinding them. Why would people be okay with this tiny animal being tortured? Animal experimentation is wrong and cruel to animal species. Medical and cosmetic testing has been done for years and it has been a controversial issue for some time. Some people having been debating whether or not there should be animal testing for past years. As stated by Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley, animal experimentation has been used for beneficial research, but is not worth the lives and abuse of the animals. Sadly, the ProCon organization explains “how over 26 million animals are mistreated each year for both scientific and commercial purposes.” Continuing animal testing is like people smoking cigarettes. It is an issue that is just being ignored and has to be stopped. Animal testing should be banned because it cannot always be accurate, there are other options that can benefit research efficiently, and it can kill and torture animals.

Did you know that sixty percent of all animals in laboratories are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing? Everyone has a different view of animals; many people see animals as companions and others see animals for advancing medical or experimental research. Whichever way someone looks at an animal, the fact is that animals are being experimented on by research facilities everywhere. Although humans sometimes benefit from animal research, the pain the animals endure is unnecessary. Animals being used in research or to test the safety of products is wrong, but there are arguments for both sides. The first argument is what the animals in laboratories suffer from.

Animal testing refers to procedures that take place in human clinical trials and it involves dosing, toxicity and efficiency of drugs. “ Humans beings have long used animals as test subjects for a variety of purposes.” (“Animal”) which violates the living rights of animals. Animals and people are alike in many ways, as close relatives we both feel, think , behave and experience pain therefore animals should be treated with the same value and respect as humans. Animal testing is inhumane and it contradicts the rights of life of an animal, thus animal testing should not be morally justified.

95% of the animals utilized as a part of testing are not secured by the Animal Welfare Act, also known as the AWA. The main and only United States law that oversees the use of animals in research facilities is the AWA. It enables animals to be singed, stunned, harmed, starved, disengaged, coercively controlled, put on dangerous long time medications, and brain damaged. No experiments—no matter how painful or trivial—are

What would you do if you were forced to live in filthy conditions, subjected to various tortures and horrifying ordeals? This is the life of an animal kept as a tool for scientific research. The debate over human animal testing has been ongoing for many years, starting as early as the 19th century. However, animal testing has been recorded as early as 500 BC, and has been practiced ever since. People have been advocating for more humane practices for animal testing since the 19th century, when Queen Victoria publicly displayed her disgust at these practices. Scientists should not continue animal testing because there are alternatives that are safer for the animals, the treatment of said animals has been shown to be inhumane, and the testing done on some of these animals does not even translate to humans.

When I say fuzzy bunny or tiny kitten, what comes to mind? I envision a warm feeling sweeps through your heart as you imagine a soft cuddly creature wrapped in your arms. Now, what comes to mind when I say cosmetics? Do you think lotion or women’s make up? You probably do not realize the connection between a fuzzy bunny and your daily moisturizer, but in the U.S, there is actually an alarming connection between the two. In the United States, researchers for cosmetic companies see the same animals that we see as cute pets as a tool that can be used to determine if ingredients used in cosmetics, or the cosmetic itself, will cause skin irritation and other negative side effects in humans.

It shows clearly that animal testing is very cruel and inhumane, because scientist force them to eat and drink just for experiment. “For example: forcing dogs to inhale cigarette smoke did not show a link to lung cancer; Flossing, an arthritis medication, tested safe in monkeys but caused deaths in humans; and the recalled diet drug fen-phen caused no heart damage in animals, while it did in humans--just a small sampling of volumes of examples.” (NEAVS-- New England anti-vivisection society)

Animal testing has always been a topic of debate in the masses, especially in the last

Thirdly, there are many alternatives that now exist that can replace the harmful use of animals. Methods such as in vitro testing, advanced computer-modeling techniques (often referred to as in silico models), and studies with human volunteers are ways that are more inexpensive than animal testing and provide better results. For example, in vitro tests can be used where scientists study the cell cultured in a petri dish. These tests can produce more relevant results than animal testing because they use human cells which are more accurate. This methods and the other methods are not altered by the difference in species making it easier to apply the tests to humans, taking less time and money. In addition, Harvard’s Wyss Institute has created “organs-on-chips” that contain human cells grown in a state-of-the-art system to mimic the structure and function of human organs and organ systems. The chips can be used instead of animals in disease research, drug testing, and toxicity testing and have been shown to replicate human physiology, diseases, and drug responses more accurately than harsh animal experiments do. If these tests can be used rather than the testing on animals, then why do we still murder primates for unnecessary reasons?

The organization, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals or PETA strictly enforces that “Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment or abuse in any other way”. This is an American animal rights organization based in Norfolk, Virginia and led by Ingrid Newkirk. PETA is also known to be the largest animals’ rights organization in the world (“About PETA”). Four areas in which animals suffer most extrusively for extended periods of time are predominantly focused on. The food industry, clothing trade, laboratories and the entertainment industry has ethical regulations that has to be followed and obeyed to perform any procedure. Although, there are hundreds of these organizations all around the world, professionals and unprofessionals abuse the rights every day. Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in US labs every year (“11 Facts About Animal Testing”). The regulations were made by establishing different acts such as the Animal Welfare Act signed in 1966 by President Lynden B Johnson (“Animal Welfare Information Center”). This act provides minimum standards of care and treatment that should be given to certain animals in commercial selling, research, transporting and exhibiting to public. Animals advocates want this law more strictly enforced due to the veterinarians performing malpractice. Malpractice can be performed when veterinarians have poor judgement or they are careless. Although this can result in something

When we buy a hygiene product we tend to look for an inexpensive, yet worthy item that will provide us with what we want, promising results. However, when you read the back of the bottle how promising is the source? Do you truly understand what the ingredients are, the process it takes to make the product and who is involved with creating it? Well, if you know the sources and ingredients of most hygiene products on today’s market, you may be aware that animal testing is the method used to create the product. Animal testing started back in the year of 1966, which was passed by the federal Animal Welfare Act, the method involves testing cosmetics on animals to determine the safety and possibility of allergic reactions caused by products that humans use. Jeremy Bentham once said “ The question is not, can they reason? Nor, can they talk? But, can they suffer? “

Experimentation of animals has animal rights advocates and some scientists questioning the effectiveness and validity that animal testing has a meaningful impact on medical advancement. Dating back to the 2nd century B.C., early Greek scientists performed experiments on living animals for the purpose of advancing their knowledge and understanding of the human body. However, recent research has proven that animals rarely serve as good models for the human body (Animal Testing, 2015). Everyone agrees that animals are used for research. Some people believe that it is unethical treatment of animals, while others believe that animal testing is necessary for the advancement of improving human health. (People for the, 2014). Experimentation on animals is costly, unethical, and unreliable, and should be prohibited.