The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

It is not often that one sees the gruesome ways of animal experimentation in person. In short, it is the use of non-human animals in labs to find variables that affect the behavior of the human biological system (Google). Many people-like the PETA organization or the Humane Society-oppose these practices, but even this opposition is not enough to stop testing from happening for things such as cosmetics testing, chimpanzee experimentation, and genetically engineered farm animals. Although some of the testing produces positive results-such as a drug working-it is at the expense of millions of tortured animals; therefore, a simple solution would be to prohibit the use of animals in research.

Animal testing continues to assist in evolving the medical field in other ways besides testing treatments. Animals gives doctors the ability to practice different surgeries, and it has succeeded for many different operations. “Modern surgical techniques including hip replacement surgery, kidney transplants, heart transplants, and blood transfusions were all perfected in animals” (Understanding Animal Research, 2014, p.1). If animal testing were abandoned, doctors would not be able to get the practice for a certain surgery. New surgeries would not be able to develop as time moves on as well. “Experiments using animals are not merely helpful; they were and remain a necessary condition for most critical advances in protecting human health” (Silver Lake Intermediate School, 2010, p.4). Using animals in research is what keeps the human race going and safer from diseasee. Many people want to take this away, but they do not understand the importance behind using animals for experiments. Humans would struggle in so many different ways just because people do not want to harm animals in the process of medical research. Even so, animal experimentation is not as terrifying as most people would think.

In the United States, over 100 million animals are used for experimentation and testing every year. Most of these animals will either live a lifetime of misery and neglect or face death. A copious amount of controversy surrounds animal experimentation because of the way it is performed. Animal testing is done to test products for harsh chemicals, for medical research, and educational purposes.

Despite controversy over animal testing, according to statistics conducted by the Foundation for Biomedical Research, roughly 95% of all lab animals are some strain of mouse or rat. () Scientific researchers rely on mice and rats for several reasons, one being convenience. Rodents are small, easily housed and maintained, and adapt well to new surroundings. They also reproduce quickly and have a short lifespan of two to three years, allowing several generations to be observed in a relatively short period of time. Another reason laboratories use rats is in order to obtain genetic purity and consistency; rodents raised for animal testing can be bred so that they are almost genetically identical to prevent any bias in experimental results (Iannaccone & Jacob, 2009). What makes rats most

According to the National Institutes of Health, animal testing has been around since the days of philosopher Aristotle. According to ProCon.org, there are an estimated 26 million animals used for scientific and commercial testing in the U.S. alone. Animal testing has brought many good things to the medical world, such as the treatment various disease. Also, the animal is being tested by many cosmetics companies. On the other hand, organizations like PETA- People of Ethical Treatment of Animals have fought against the medical testing of animals. There are pros and cons that come with the usage of animals in the biomedical and cosmetic testing, and each side needs should be carefully examined before deciding one way or another.

In 2014 a group organization called People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) noted that more than 100 million animals are harmed or killed during animal testing. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals are being used for medical testing, but are not being cared for before, during, or after testing. Animals and humans are very similar, in that we have the same organ system which performs the same tasks in a similar fashion. Even though animals and humans share comparable DNA, we fail to see the similarities in physical and emotional pain that animals endure during testing. Subjecting even one animal to that type of cruelty, all in the name of science is one too many.

Over one hundred million animals every year die from animal testing, in the medical and cosmetic fields alone (“Experiments on Animals: Overview”). Animal testing is as big of a problem today as it has been in the past. Most people do not agree with animal testing today but years ago it was one of the only ways of testing. It was considered, if not the only, effective and efficient ways of testing a product’s toxicity. To date, animal testing is not warranted because of the development of new technology and past discoveries. Many organizations and brands publicly oppose animal testing. The companies that stand against animal testing are broad and diverse, ranging from medical to cosmetic testing, advocating that at its core, this issue is

Have you ever wondered how it would feel to be forced to do things against your will? Every year more than 100 million animals suffer each year. They are forced to eat, get physically hurt, and overall being traumatized. Despite animals not being exactly like humans, they still feel the same pain and emotions as us. Animals should not be used in medical testing or product testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane with animals being forced to do things they wouldn't want to do.

Many people believe animal research will help the medical field and the marketplace. Animal tests are often considered to be one of the cheapest routes to supply the demand of new and exciting ingredients in their products and to make sure they are "safe" but this is not true. Some of the main causes for animal testing are 1. To advance scientific and medical understanding. Most of what we know today about drugs and the body's anatomy and functions can be traced back to the experiments from animal research. By comparing the differences between the animals and studying the similarities scientists are finding new cures and new drugs. And 2. To protect the safety of the customers from harsh chemicals. The animal research tests provides data on the products and safety. Though these may be good reasons to experiment the abusive way they are going at it is very wrong and inhumane. Millions of animals are affected by animal testing and they need us to be their

Do you think that animal testing is economically sound? Animal testing is wrong for the

Over 100 million animals are killed in experiments in the U.S. alone each year, according Laboratory Animal Resource Center at UC San Francisco. At the University of Missouri a study was done were they intentionally damaged the corneas of the dogs and given a topical acid treatment that was supposed to heal the eye, it did not, and the beagles were eventually put to death. Because of the cruel nature of animal testing, there should be an alternative.

Products that fill the shelves of supermarkets have a more complicated background than many believe. Behind every ingredient that companies list on packaging of cosmetics and medicine, both prescription and over the counter, is a choice that corporations must make regarding the treatment of animals. Laboratories harm animals and even kill them when conducting laboratory tests for new products. Numerous tests have been created since the wide use of animals, such as artificial skin tests that have no negative consequence for them. Global governments have differing laws dealing with these harmful means of production, but many allow this to take place, while even protecting household pets. Many people do not think of the process that precedes products on store shelves. Deadly animal testing with questionable ingredients is constantly being proven to be outdated by new types of tests for both cosmetic and medical uses.

It is estimated by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) that over one hundred million animals are killed each year by animal testing. The term “animal testing” refers to experimentation that takes place before human clinical trials to determine the dosing, toxicity, and efficiency of products for humans. This includes animals being tested for medical research, cosmetic products, and curiosity-driven experimentation. Many times this leads to animals being treated inhumanely and has led to serious controversy over whether animal testing is actually effective. In fact, animal testing is frowned upon because studies show that testing animals are not a direct analogy to impacting humans, animal testing also kills an unprecedented number of animals, and throughout the year’s scientists have found alternative methods for creating beneficial products for humans.

Over the years millions of animals are killed in laboratories, Including thousands of dogs- most Beagles. These beagles get confined for years or months, The dogs are usually kept in small cages or runs. Most of the time of their lives, Their being used for toxicology, the Beagles get fed lines of experimental drugs. They do this until the Beagle is dead from all the toxins it consumed, leading to a slow and painful death.

To begin, some people believe that animal testing is justifiable if done in moderation and is consistent within the law. With scientific research, there are ground rules that researchers have to follow in order to ensure a safe and inhumane practice unto the test object. In the medical field, numerous diseases, medicines, and solutions for horrible sicknesses are tested on animals in order to bring forth a new method to conquering the issue. In 1959, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique was published by Burch and Russel introduced substitutions to decrease the pain an animals experiences. “They introduced and defines the terms replacement, reduction, and refinement, which subsequently have become known as ‘alternative methods’ for minimizing the potential for animal pain and distress in biomedical research” (Russel and Burch). Replacement according to Bruch and Russel mean that there various options other than animals to conduct experiments on such as humans. Reduction is the lesser amount of animals used to gain statistics for the needed material they are researching for. Either scientists could use fewer animals, or they can have a set number of animals that they can use multiple times for different reasons. Finally, refinement is the overall hospitality that the animal receives. While being used in a test, the animals should feel the upmost comfort, and they environment should bring forth a comforting feeling overall (Burch and Russel). With these, animals can