The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Over one hundred million animals every year die from animal testing, in the medical and cosmetic fields alone (“Experiments on Animals: Overview”). Animal testing is as big of a problem today as it has been in the past. Most people do not agree with animal testing today but years ago it was one of the only ways of testing. It was considered, if not the only, effective and efficient ways of testing a product’s toxicity. To date, animal testing is not warranted because of the development of new technology and past discoveries. Many organizations and brands publicly oppose animal testing. The companies that stand against animal testing are broad and diverse, ranging from medical to cosmetic testing, advocating that at its core, this issue is

Do you think that animal testing is economically sound? Animal testing is wrong for the

Each year, more than 100 million animals are experimented on in U.S. laboratories. These experiments are for things such as biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing.(Procon writers) Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. Animal testing is controversial and people find themselves taking sides on the issue, depending on whether they believe the testing is ethical or not. In my opinion, I feel to further human knowledge and safety through animal experimentation is both necessary and vital. I support continuance of

Chemicals, cosmetics, household products, and medical devices have been tested on animals such as mice, rabbits and rats, and more for a number of years. It is assumed that a humans’ response to these types of products will often correlate with the responses of an animal (Testing). Animals are tested because they are deemed as key information to help develop new medicines, and discover more about human health and biology. Some believe using animals only for human advantage is morally wrong, while others believe not experimenting at all would hinder our understanding of well-being and ailment, which would affect the progress of new and vital treatments. Researchers are mandated to follow specific instructions in order to minimize the harm experienced. The first of the instructions is using a substitute like human volunteers, cell culture, or computer modelling when applicable. Next, is bettering experimental procedures and communicating with other researchers so that the same experiments are not being repeated by several people, which will accordingly reduce the number of animals used. Lastly, less invasive procedures are used when possible to reduce stress or discomfort, and expand medical care and living conditions (Should animals be used in research, 2017).

More than 100 million animals are killed in the United States annually for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven testing, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Animal testing in America has lasted for many years. It has long been viewed as a way to find cures for human diseases and test the safety of consumer products. However, animal testing is very costly and wastes time compared to other options. Many test subjects even die due to experiments. Human anatomy is also very different from animals’, so test results are not always accurate. Animal product testing should not be performed because it is more expensive and time consuming than other alternatives, ineffective as humans are not genetically parallel to test

Throughout history man has suffered from a myriad of diseases and health conditions that we only know more about and can treat or prevent through animal testing. Animals in captivity are not only used to advance medical research, but also to prevent species extinction and for educational purposes. The debate about holding animals’ captive has been a long and heated one that has no endpoint anywhere in sight. The main argument of the opposition to using animals in biomedical research, zoos and aquariums is that animals are treated in inhumanely.

In the United States, 26 million animals are used annually for cosmetic or scientific research and testing. Animal testing is widely controversial because it could potentially harm the animals being used while there are alternative methods that could be used in place of animals. But, from a scientific standpoint, animals in testing are one of the main reasons we have been able to make advances in medicine and diseases. These facts make it tricky to pinpoint exactly if animal testing is good or bad (“Should Animal Testing Be Used for Testing”).

Animals, like us, are complex and capable of thoughts. They are involved in social structures that are similar to humans. Without a doubt, the animals that we use are capable of thinking, feeling, and suffering. Opinions about animal tests, though, vary. There is a distinct majority who disapprove the usage of animals for commercial and other scientific testings; the opinion shifts once the research is claimed to save or greatly benefit human lives, even if these claims are baseless and false. However, due to its immorality and wrongful ethics, animal testing should no longer be condoned and supported.

Animals testing has become a cruel and repetitive method in the cosmetic and medical industry. Not only is the practice inhumane, but is also argued by many researchers and scientist to be ineffective. Millions of animals are killed every year in the United States because of animal testing. The United Kingdom, New Zealand and Turkey have passed laws in the last decade protecting animals from the unnecessary torture of lab testing. The United states needs to follow suite, enforcing improved laws banning cosmetic and medical animal testing. The use of animals in labs and research is a problem that has been happening for thousands of years, animals have been used for testing the safety of food and chemicals. Records as far back as 500 B.C. show animal welfare has been a low priority in human evolution. The testing researchers do on animals reacts differently on humans; consequently, they waste millions of dollars, time, and innocent lives.

Animal testing is commonly known as the experimentation of animals for research purposes. It is mostly used today for biomedical research and cosmetic testing. This research method has made a tremendous contribution to medical advancements and the protection of humans. Animals such as mice, dogs, cats, and even cows are used to perform experimental trials that help develop new medicine and better products. Although animal testing is seen as negative and inhumane to many, it is a beneficial way to improve human wellbeing.

Your beloved grandpa hasn’t been feeling well recently. When he goes to the doctors, they say he needs a heart transplant. After they find a suitable heart, your grandpa goes to surgery. He is now good as new. Now, imagine a world without animal testing. You may think that it would be the same, but he would be dead. Organ transplants are one of many results that came out of animal testing. Animal testing is when you run tests on an animal to find out the impact of a certain product. In the United States, millions of rats, mice, birds, fish, and other animals are used every year in tests. These tests can test the effectiveness of a new painkiller or determine if a shampoo causes skin or eye irritation ("Animal Experimentation").This isn’t new because animal testing has been used for centuries. For example, in the fifth century BC, the Greek philosopher Alcmaeon learned what caused blindness by looking at the inside of a dog's eye. The Greek physician Galen studied animals' anatomy and physiology by dissecting live animals. His work was used widely throughout the centuries as a medical reference. Also, in the seventeenth century, English physician William Harvey observed living animals by cutting them open as to determine how the heart worked and how blood flowed through the body. Harvey's results largely impacted science and medicine of the era ("Animal Experimentation"). If we stop animal testing, we could halt our progress in medicine. Although people may say animal testing

To begin, some people believe that animal testing is justifiable if done in moderation and is consistent within the law. With scientific research, there are ground rules that researchers have to follow in order to ensure a safe and inhumane practice unto the test object. In the medical field, numerous diseases, medicines, and solutions for horrible sicknesses are tested on animals in order to bring forth a new method to conquering the issue. In 1959, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique was published by Burch and Russel introduced substitutions to decrease the pain an animals experiences. “They introduced and defines the terms replacement, reduction, and refinement, which subsequently have become known as ‘alternative methods’ for minimizing the potential for animal pain and distress in biomedical research” (Russel and Burch). Replacement according to Bruch and Russel mean that there various options other than animals to conduct experiments on such as humans. Reduction is the lesser amount of animals used to gain statistics for the needed material they are researching for. Either scientists could use fewer animals, or they can have a set number of animals that they can use multiple times for different reasons. Finally, refinement is the overall hospitality that the animal receives. While being used in a test, the animals should feel the upmost comfort, and they environment should bring forth a comforting feeling overall (Burch and Russel). With these, animals can

Europe, the world’s largest cosmetic market, Israel, and India have already banned animal testing for cosmetics, and the sale or import of newly animal-tested beauty products. Major companies have turned their backs completely on animal testing and no longer use ingredients that were tested on animals – and a number of animal tests have been completely replaced with superior, cheaper and more effective non-animal methods. Proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism, and that strict regulations prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that the laws only protect the least number of animals, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.

It is estimated that over one hundred million animals are killed each year because of animal testing. The term “Animal Testing” refers to experimentation which takes place before human clinical trials to determine the dosing, toxicity, and efficacy of products for humans. This includes animals being tested for medical research, cosmetic products, and curiosity-driven experimentation. Many times this leads to animals being treated inhumanly and has led to serious controversy in whether or not animal testing is actually effective. In fact, many studies show that testing animals is not a direct analogy for impacting humans, it also kills an unprecedented amount of animals, and throughout the years scientists have found alternative methods for creating beneficial products for humans.

When people think about animal testing they think of animals that are being tortured and killed to find out a new medical treatment. The definition of “Animal testing” is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. Animal testing usually focuses on finding a cure for a disease, but keeping an animal to see if a certain kind of disease can be cured using an animal first is not right. Animals should not be used for research because it is cruel, it is unreliable, and it is expensive.