The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

“Animal testing is needless, especially in cosmetics” (Leona Lewis). Animals are being mistreated because of U.S labs. Furthermore, animals are dying in experimenting labs from the cruel and hard conditions. Although, animals often make better research subjects than human beings because of their shorter life cycles, animals should not be tested in experiments, because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals used in experiments are are commonly using force feeding, force inhalation, food and water deprivation, and many others.

Did you know over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year? Animal testing for scientific research has become an epidemic in the scientific community. These tests have been proven to be inefficient and unnecessary but the animals usually experience immense amounts of pain and fear. Throughout this paper, I will highlight key points and provide a reliable amount of information to prove animal testing is unneeded, tortures, and inhuman.

When buying cosmetics or medication at the store, do you ever think about where it came from or whom it was tested on? Animals have been used in research for the past couple of decades and it continues to be a topic of serious debate to this day. Animal testing involves the process of subjecting animals to clinical trials rather than human trials in order to test the effectiveness of certain drugs and products. The debate is whether or not it is morally right or wrong to use animals during experimentation. Many scientists argue that it is necessary to use animal research in saving lives, but animal rights activists argue that is unnecessary and inhumane. Both arguments have valid points and although animal testing has offered a lot of medical advances and knowledge over the past couple of years, that would’ve been nearly impossible otherwise, it is an inhumane process, and should be limited, if not ended all together. Animal testing should be eliminated for various reasons. The first and most important reason is that it is cruel and causes stress to the animals. They are put in cages where they undergo painful and stressful experimentation. Animals are quite intelligent and they can feel emotions just like we can. They should be allowed the freedom to experience a normal life. Another reason to eliminate testing altogether is that there are other alternatives that are more ethical. For the most part, animal testing doesn’t always provide the exact results as they would on a

Animals testing has been one the issues where people are fighting overtime because of its ethical. Even though some results of tests are successfully work on people, but many people are still fighting for the animal’s rights. They believe that animals should have their own rights to be live a free life to where they belong just like their species. In scientists point of view, animals have been one of the main subjects to do test on, but a lot of them are currently looking forward to use and develop alternatives for the cruel act of animal testing.

Animal testing started back in the late nineteenth century when french biologist, Louis Pasteur, [7] tested anthrax on sheep to show how important vaccines really are. Despite the advantages that may have come from animal testing, it is an extremely controversial topic to this very day. People prefer to look at animals as they would humans; something with emotions, feelings, and even similar body parts. Based on PETA, over one million animals are tested on each year in U.S. laboratories [1] and what is being tested on them can range from cosmetics to household cleaners. Although the companies that are involved in the testing are being blamed for the countless brutality to animals, it is being done for the safety of humans. Is animal testing really necessary or is it doing more bad than good for business?

“Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and ambushed in US labs every year” (dosomething. org). Many different types of animals are being tested for multiple reasons such as cosmetics, medicines, pesticides, drugs and different cleaning and germ killing household products. There has been a lot of controversy and debates about testing products on animals. Both scientists and animal activists have voiced their opinions and concerns on the issue.

Every day animals go through animal testing, and what the people of the world don’t know is that animal testing is animal cruelty. According to the Humane Society International, the animals used in testing are commonly found being force-fed, deprived of food and water, decapitation, purposely burned or hurt, breaking their necks, etc. (Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing)

During 384-322 BC, Aristotle performed the first animal experiment on living animals. Galen, a 2nd century Rome physician, was considered “Father of Vivisection”. The animals that Galen dissected was goats and pigs. Eight hundred years later in current day Spain, was Avenzoar, who proposed animal testing as an experimental method before applying to humans. Since then, animal experimentation and research has been with us for thousands of years. It is has been the most effective method to test new medicines and new treatments. Due to its benefits; finding new medicines, controlled experimentation, and discovered new diseases in the animal kingdom, animal research is necessary to further expand our medical and biological knowledge.

Animals have had a role in scientific research since the advent of modern medicine in early Greece around the year 300 BC (Hajar, M.D.). However, in recent years, a growth in attention and funding has led to an increase in the number of animals bred and raised for the sole purpose of use in testing. With this increase has come the division in opinion of whether or not scientists should continue their use of mammals and amphibians in their research or abandon such a practice for newer, potentially more accurate methods, such as free-standing human tissue cells (Ferdowsian). Regardless of one’s personal stance, it is hard to ignore the benefits animal testing has had on humanity. Testing cosmetics and medicine on mammals, for example, can filter out products which might yield a harmful result in humans. The utilitarian viewpoint cites benefits such as this. Animal Ethics, a nonprofit seeking to evaluate both sides of the ethics argument surrounding a host of animal issues justifies the utilitarian idea that “...the use of nonhuman animals can be acceptable only if the happiness their exploitation causes is greater than the harm it causes” (Animal Ethics). The opposing side, those who believe in inherent value, claim that animals should be given equal moral consideration as humans would, based on their capacity to suffer (Foëx). Both views hold merit, though as the cosmetic and medical technology industries grow, we as a nation must confront the issue of whether or not animals

You are in Sephora and the most beautiful eyeshadow is there, but notice it is one of the many brands that test on animals. You keep picturing the poor bunnies, kittens and puppies stuffed in cages starving or force-feed to so much they cannot move. The sadness in their eyes, the multiple surgeries and tests they must go through on a daily basis. Animal testing is not, but should be a banned form of commercial and scientific testing. In a world as advanced as ours, animals should no longer be the test subject because it is no longer an ideal method. There are countless other effective methods of testing these products that do not involve harming anything. The animals chosen for the testing are all-around different from the human species. The use of animals costs much more than its equally effective counterparts. Testing harmful products on helpless animals is inhumane and cruel.

Research can be done in many ways. However, some ways are not as ethical as others,

Animals, like us, are complex and capable of thoughts. They are involved in social structures that are similar to humans. Without a doubt, the animals that we use are capable of thinking, feeling, and suffering. Opinions about animal tests, though, vary. There is a distinct majority who disapprove the usage of animals for commercial and other scientific testings; the opinion shifts once the research is claimed to save or greatly benefit human lives, even if these claims are baseless and false. However, due to its immorality and wrongful ethics, animal testing should no longer be condoned and supported.

According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, every year about 100 million animals will be used for lab testing in the United States.(PETA) These animals range from fish to horses, and everything in between; and although this type of experimentation endangers the lives of animals, still many argue that it greatly benefits mankind. The opposition believes that limiting animal experimentation will stop the progress they are making in science, and experimentation in laboratories isn't unruly. The American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, or AALAS, has established nine guidelines that all experimenters must follow when using animals; these guidelines were put in place to protect animals from being harmed. Although they were intended for the purpose of protecting animal rights, most scientists don’t comply with them. Cases of animal abuse and neglect have risen and are very common amongst laboratories. These guidelines created are not providing enough restrictions to prevent animal abuse in the laboratory setting. Solely using guidelines will not stop the abuse and neglect that goes on in these experiments.

In the United States, 26 million animals are used annually for cosmetic or scientific research and testing. Animal testing is widely controversial because it could potentially harm the animals being used while there are alternative methods that could be used in place of animals. But, from a scientific standpoint, animals in testing are one of the main reasons we have been able to make advances in medicine and diseases. These facts make it tricky to pinpoint exactly if animal testing is good or bad (“Should Animal Testing Be Used for Testing”).

Your beloved grandpa hasn’t been feeling well recently. When he goes to the doctors, they say he needs a heart transplant. After they find a suitable heart, your grandpa goes to surgery. He is now good as new. Now, imagine a world without animal testing. You may think that it would be the same, but he would be dead. Organ transplants are one of many results that came out of animal testing. Animal testing is when you run tests on an animal to find out the impact of a certain product. In the United States, millions of rats, mice, birds, fish, and other animals are used every year in tests. These tests can test the effectiveness of a new painkiller or determine if a shampoo causes skin or eye irritation ("Animal Experimentation").This isn’t new because animal testing has been used for centuries. For example, in the fifth century BC, the Greek philosopher Alcmaeon learned what caused blindness by looking at the inside of a dog's eye. The Greek physician Galen studied animals' anatomy and physiology by dissecting live animals. His work was used widely throughout the centuries as a medical reference. Also, in the seventeenth century, English physician William Harvey observed living animals by cutting them open as to determine how the heart worked and how blood flowed through the body. Harvey's results largely impacted science and medicine of the era ("Animal Experimentation"). If we stop animal testing, we could halt our progress in medicine. Although people may say animal testing