The Pros And Cons Of Big Game Hunting

Poaching animals is defined as the “illegal hunting or capturing of wild animals mainly in areas in which hunting is forbidden” . The main difference between poaching and hunting is the legal permission, indeed “hunting is regulated by the government, and hunters must obtain permits authorizing them to kill certain animals” .

Because of the sale of illegal ivory so many elephants' lives are put at risk. If the poaching of elephants and ever-growing trade in illegal ivory is to be seriously addressed, part of the solution to this complex problem must be a return to the full ban on the sale of ivory established in 1989 (Bloody Ivory). Between 434,000 and 684,000 African savanna elephants in 18 countries remain, down 30% in the last seven years. Once again levels of poaching and illegal trade have spiraled out of control. Rates of poaching are now the worst they have been since 1989. There are no easy answers, but a total ivory trade ban is the one strategy we know has worked (Mary Rice). Hong Kong seized 779 elephant tusks three days into 2013, over a ton of ivory,

Since the European colonization of eastern Africa, trophy hunting has been a highly debatable topic. During the early days of trophy hunting, dwindling numbers of some of the world’s most unique and prized wildlife was not a problem like it is today. Wildlife conservationists and hunters continue to debate the merits of legalized hunting on the economy and on the environment. However, not all hunters value the economic benefits and have passion for the outdoors. In fact, some of these hunters are conservationists themselves, who believe that it will allow for better conservation efforts in the long run. In another perspective, trophy hunters tend to downplay the reality of the killing part. To kill is to put to death, extinguish, nullify, cancel, or destroy. There is a fine line between conservation, and senseless killing of animals involved in trophy hunting.

Advocators may attest that big game hunting controls animal population, however this is not accurate information because they fail to realize the excessive amounts of animals that are slaughtered by hunters. Pertinent to an article written by NLCATP.org, “Without the existence of hunting research shows that some animal species populations might grow to large numbers that are not ideal.” Even though this may reveal little truth, we must not be ignorant to the fact that hunting and “big game” hunting are two different activities. Big game hunting is usually

Hunting has been around before basic civilization had even existed, ours ancestors were the ones who started hunting to survive. Men were taught a way of living by baiting species for daily nutrition, warm clothing, and population aspects on earth. As the growth of civilization evolved and new weapons, including archery tools, rifles, and firearms were created. However some hunters wanted to target  massive terrene mammals.

Wildlife hunting is a big business a 2013 estimate valued the illegal poaching trade in Africa worth 17 billion dollars a year and growing. While elephant poaching between 1800’s - 1999 and 2000’s and up have some similarities they also have a wide variety of differences. Elephant poaching in 1800’s-1999 was done to meet the worldwide demands, but elephant poaching in 2000’s and above was done for sport. Elephant poaching is wrong and shouldn’t be done.

Hunters illegally poach wild animals for furs or tusks and some animals have become extinct due to the poaching. Hunters poach animals such as Elephants, Rhinos, Tigers, and even Pangolins. Most people do not even know what a Pangolin is but poachers certainly do. Poaching has become a nineteen billion dollar a year business. In Pennsylvania people can poach and have no chance of imprisonment. Each state is different with poaching laws. Poachers are no worse of criminals than thieves. Poachers essentially are stealing from the organization that creates the fees for hunting.

418 people out of 100,000 go to the emergency room for animal related injuries per year(statistia 2016). If we have trophy hunts we can reduce these numbers. Recently Cecil the lion was killed, he was shot by a hunter. He had all of the right permits and the lion went out of the protected area and was shot and the hunter had no idea was protected. Big game hunting laws should not change because it brings a lot of revenue to countries, it helps manage the animal populations and it keeps from hurting more people/animals.

history of hunting reveals that hunters of today share many of the same motivations and methods as ancient hunters. While technology and accessories may be different that those used for hunting thousands of years ago, the ability to take down an animal is something to be celebrated. When you learn the history of hunting, you’ll gain greater appreciation for this old tradition. Hunting is an essential component of conservation and can be used in everyday life; it has been a part of American history from its earliest beginnings and once provided a necessary source of food. In the early 1900s, when many wildlife species were almost near extinction, hunters stepped forward and asked Congress to impose an excise tax on the sale of firearms and ammunition products to help fund wildlife conservation in the United States. Another act that came into effect was the Conservation Movement. The conservation movement covers the movement to preserve and protect America’s wildlife, the lands, and other natural resources. A lot of hunters hunt for one purpose and that is to feed their families. These hunters usually hunt during the specific seasons where they can harvest the animals that their families will eat. Hunting is also an effective form of management because it will remove a number of individual animals from a population and prevent them from reproducing. Reducing the population will reduce human/animal conflicts, such as car collisions, Lyme disease and landscaping damage.

Hunting has been around for a very long time, as time progresses, it becomes more modern. The main two weapons for hunting are guns and bows. The debate between what is better for hunting has been around forever. There is many advantages and disadvantages for both weapons but the decision on what to use comes down to one thing: what will make the hunter the most successful. There are many different factors to think about when coming down to a conclusion. James Fackrell from Ezinearticles states, “Most rifle hunters say that bow hunters should rifle hunt while bow hunters say that rifle hunters should pick a bow. In the end do what makes you most happy and most comfortable” (para. 1). Making the decision can be hard and involve many details to think about, but in the the end, being comfortable with what you’re using is also an important decision. The best choice to go with is what weapon will be most comfortable and relative as well as ensuring a successful hunt. Hunting with a gun and bow are very different, their effective distance, noise made, and fairness to the animals are all very different.

Imagine your posterity growing up in a world without the Big Five. The Big Five are the game animals, Lion, Leopard, Rhinoceros, Elephant and Cape Buffalo. These animals are significant because they are the hardest to hunt, making their way to the top of hunter bucket lists. Trophy hunting is the selective hunting of wild game for human recreation. The “trophy” parts of the animals are kept to be displayed while the carcass is left behind. Trophy hunting is unnecessary and does little to help threatened species.

Though this may be the case sometimes the majority of the time people only do it for their self-benefit. Though people treat poaching as if it’s just another job. In reality, though it should see as a felony. People see statues and art made of ivory and don’t think much of it. Until someone would tell that person the dark secret about how that statue was made. People can’t just go say that this art was made with the remains of an animal. If society learned the truth it would spark an argument on how animals are being treated. No person should ever have to resort to

One of the most controversial topics in the past and even more so today is hunting. Hunting has been around as long as we know it. Ancient civilizations hunted as a source of food, tools, and clothes. Hunting is the act of one animal pursuing another wild animal and killing it. Humans much like other animals hunt mainly for a source of food, although; humans also hunt as a way of protecting their selves, to remove unwanted animals, and to eliminate predators. Hunting for many has become a challenge; a challenge to kill the elusive game the hunter or huntress is in pursuit of. Many people around the world hunt all different kinds of game. Some animals have become extinct due to over hunting the animals, but laws have been put in place to protect this from happening to other animals. Wildlife conservation foundations have greatly benefited from hunters who have donated billions of dollars to these foundations. Hunters around the world enjoy the pastime, however; to such groups like PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) despise hunting. These anti-hunting groups go as far as condemning those who take part in hunting as a recreational activity of killing animals. Even though many people and groups are against hunting, hunting has boosts local and national economies, improves society, and manages animal populations, which in turn helps the environment.

The Anti-Hunting community views hunting as a murderous activity that hunters use simply for enjoyment (IDA). They argue that hunting may have been a necessity for the survival of early humans, but now people seek out and take animals entirely for entertainment. They say hunters pass hunting off as a “sport” to cover up the merciless act of pass-time (PETA). These in opposition say that animals suffer extended deaths and usually do not die immediately from injuries caused

The first main point is that trophy hunting can be crucial to conservation. As hard as it is to accept that killing of animals can be necessary to their survival, the facts remain, that without hunting animals would be worse off. Many species have shown great improvement in numbers since trophy hunting began. For example, South Africa’s white rhino’s numbered 1,800 when trophy hunting began in 1968, today there are almost 20,000. Also the numbers of South Africa’s black rhinos have increased, they use to be around 1,000, but now there are almost 4,000. Also most of the proceeds go to reserves in South Africa. One reserve in South Africa used money from two white rhinos killed to pay for 49% of its high tech security fence along the border. This in turn helps anti-poaching units respond